Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Speedy
    #Ace
    • Apr 2008
    • 16143

    #121
    Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

    Originally posted by DrJones
    As to how the vote actually goes down this year (75% needed for induction): Dawson barely makes it, Blyleven barely misses out (and will make it in 2011), none of the noobs make it on the first try. Alomar will get 60-65%, Larkin a little less, Edgar and Crime Dog will be in the 40-55% range.
    Anyone else besides Dawson you feel will get in? I would agree with Blyleven, I really do believe Alomar will get inducted by the slimest of margins.
    Originally posted by Gibson88
    Anyone who asked for an ETA is not being Master of their Domain.
    It's hard though...especially when I got my neighbor playing their franchise across the street...maybe I will occupy myself with Glamore Magazine.

    Comment

    • SPTO
      binging
      • Feb 2003
      • 68046

      #122
      Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

      Originally posted by DrJones
      As to how the vote actually goes down this year (75% needed for induction): Dawson barely makes it, Blyleven barely misses out (and will make it in 2011), none of the noobs make it on the first try. Alomar will get 60-65%, Larkin a little less, Edgar and Crime Dog will be in the 40-55% range.
      How do you not have Alomar not making it in on the first ballot. The guy was the greatest 2B of his generation. Hell, during his prime people were favorably comparing him to Joe Morgan fer cryin' out loud!

      If the spitting incident is gonna cost Alomar his induction then these writers hold grudges to the point of absurdity. It's all water under the bridge between Alomar and the umpire don't you think we should let bygones be bygones?
      Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club

      "Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. Parker

      Comment

      • Mo
        SSN
        • May 2003
        • 11425

        #123
        Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

        Originally posted by SPTO

        If the spitting incident is gonna cost Alomar his induction then these writers hold grudges to the point of absurdity. It's all water under the bridge between Alomar and the umpire don't you think we should let bygones be bygones?
        If they're not voting in McGwire in what makes you think Alomar gets in. For the writers it's essentially the same thing.
        Don't you EVER read my blog? It's gotten a lot better.

        Comment

        • SPTO
          binging
          • Feb 2003
          • 68046

          #124
          Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

          Originally posted by miget33
          If they're not voting in McGwire in what makes you think Alomar gets in. For the writers it's essentially the same thing.
          Spitting is a totally different ballgame from actively "cheating" on the game of baseball. McGwire has also evaded anything to do with his past with andro and usage of steroids whereas Alomar has spoken about the spitting incident and has expressed regret that it happened.

          Totally different situations IMO
          Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club

          "Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. Parker

          Comment

          • DrJones
            All Star
            • Mar 2003
            • 9107

            #125
            Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

            Originally posted by WakeUnc2321
            Anyone else besides Dawson you feel will get in? I would agree with Blyleven, I really do believe Alomar will get inducted by the slimest of margins.
            No. I'll be very surprised if any of the newcomers make it on the first ballot.
            Originally posted by Thrash13
            Dr. Jones was right in stating that. We should have believed him.
            Originally posted by slickdtc
            DrJones brings the stinky cheese is what we've all learned from this debacle.
            Originally posted by Kipnis22
            yes your fantasy world when your proven wrong about 95% of your post

            Comment

            • DrJones
              All Star
              • Mar 2003
              • 9107

              #126
              Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

              Originally posted by SPTO
              How do you not have Alomar not making it in on the first ballot. The guy was the greatest 2B of his generation. Hell, during his prime people were favorably comparing him to Joe Morgan fer cryin' out loud!

              If the spitting incident is gonna cost Alomar his induction then these writers hold grudges to the point of absurdity. It's all water under the bridge between Alomar and the umpire don't you think we should let bygones be bygones?
              Wanna bet? If anything, my percentages are a little on the high side. It's been already pointed out in this thread that it took Ryne Sandberg 3 tries to get elected (on his first try, he received under 50%), and Sandberg was a FAR more popular player than Alomar ever was (although their credentials are similar). Even Little Joe was far from unanimous on his first ballot with 82%.

              Take a look at HOF ballots over the last couple of decades. Only absolute no-brainers or those who are extraordinarily popular (Puckett) get in on their first try. There are still writers who won't vote for ANYBODY on the first ballot out of "principle". Trust me, it ain't happening. Robbie will have to wait a year or two to become the first Blue Jay in Cooperstown.
              Originally posted by Thrash13
              Dr. Jones was right in stating that. We should have believed him.
              Originally posted by slickdtc
              DrJones brings the stinky cheese is what we've all learned from this debacle.
              Originally posted by Kipnis22
              yes your fantasy world when your proven wrong about 95% of your post

              Comment

              • SPTO
                binging
                • Feb 2003
                • 68046

                #127
                Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

                Originally posted by DrJones
                Trust me, it ain't happening. Robbie will have to wait a year or two to become the first Blue Jay in Cooperstown.
                I know you're usually right on most things but in this case I hope you're totally wrong.
                Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club

                "Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. Parker

                Comment

                • DrJones
                  All Star
                  • Mar 2003
                  • 9107

                  #128
                  Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

                  Originally posted by SPTO
                  I know you're usually right on most things but in this case I hope you're totally wrong.
                  Yeah, me too. But as long as he gets in eventually, I'm fine with it.
                  Originally posted by Thrash13
                  Dr. Jones was right in stating that. We should have believed him.
                  Originally posted by slickdtc
                  DrJones brings the stinky cheese is what we've all learned from this debacle.
                  Originally posted by Kipnis22
                  yes your fantasy world when your proven wrong about 95% of your post

                  Comment

                  • Lintyfresh85
                    Where have I been?
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 17492

                    #129
                    Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

                    What about Lee Smith? 478 saves and he started his career when the closer position wasn't en vogue.

                    The man was a 7 time all-star and would easily had over 500 saves if he played in todays era.
                    http://flotn.blogspot.com

                    Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club

                    Originally posted by trobinson97
                    Hell, I shot my grandmother, cuz she was old.

                    Comment

                    • snepp
                      We'll waste him too.
                      • Apr 2003
                      • 10007

                      #130
                      Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

                      I think Lee Smith would be a pretty mediocre-to-awful addition. I do have a bit of an anti save/closer bias though, considering how much more valuable even a decent starter can be and how ridiculously overrated the save statistic is.

                      Throw out the save stat and what's the difference between Lee Smith and a reliever like Roberto Hernandez? Or Jeff Reardon? Or Doug Jones? Or any number of other pretty good relievers? They're all basically interchangeable.
                      Last edited by snepp; 11-29-2009, 05:02 AM.
                      Member of The OS Baseball Rocket Scientists Association

                      Comment

                      • DrJones
                        All Star
                        • Mar 2003
                        • 9107

                        #131
                        Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

                        Originally posted by snepp
                        I think Lee Smith would be a pretty mediocre-to-awful addition. I do have a bit of an anti save/closer bias though, considering how much more valuable even a decent starter can be and how ridiculously overrated the save statistic is.

                        Throw out the save stat and what's the difference between Lee Smith and a reliever like Roberto Hernandez? Or Jeff Reardon? Or Doug Jones? Or any number of other pretty good relievers? They're all basically interchangeable.
                        I agree. That being said, I'm a little befuddled as to why the voters think Bruce Sutter is worthy and Lee Smith isn't. If only Smith had claimed to invent a pitch or had a cool-looking mustache...
                        Originally posted by Thrash13
                        Dr. Jones was right in stating that. We should have believed him.
                        Originally posted by slickdtc
                        DrJones brings the stinky cheese is what we've all learned from this debacle.
                        Originally posted by Kipnis22
                        yes your fantasy world when your proven wrong about 95% of your post

                        Comment

                        • WWF80sKid
                          All Star
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 7095

                          #132
                          Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

                          I'd love to see Barry Larkin get in - but that's because he is my all time favorite player!

                          MICHIGAN WOLVERINES
                          1901 | 1902 | 1903 | 1904 | 1918 | 1923 | 1932 | 1933 | 1947 | 1948 | 1997 | 2023

                          MONTREAL CANADIENS
                          1916 | 1924 | 1930 | 1931 | 1944 | 1946 | 1953 | 1956 | 1957 | 1958 | 1959 | 1960 | 1965
                          1966 | 1968 | 1971 | 1973 | 1976 | 1977 | 1978 | 1979 | 1986 | 1993

                          Comment

                          • snepp
                            We'll waste him too.
                            • Apr 2003
                            • 10007

                            #133
                            Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

                            Originally posted by DrJones
                            If only Smith had claimed to invent a pitch or had a cool-looking mustache...
                            Sadly that's about what it boils down to.
                            Member of The OS Baseball Rocket Scientists Association

                            Comment

                            • econoodle
                              MVP
                              • Sep 2009
                              • 4884

                              #134
                              Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

                              Originally posted by DrJones
                              I agree. That being said, I'm a little befuddled as to why the voters think Bruce Sutter is worthy and Lee Smith isn't. If only Smith had claimed to invent a pitch or had a cool-looking mustache...
                              befuddled as well.

                              Comment

                              • DrJones
                                All Star
                                • Mar 2003
                                • 9107

                                #135
                                Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

                                Originally posted by DrJones
                                As to how the vote actually goes down this year (75% needed for induction): Dawson barely makes it, Blyleven barely misses out (and will make it in 2011), none of the noobs make it on the first try. Alomar will get 60-65%, Larkin a little less, Edgar and Crime Dog will be in the 40-55% range.
                                Ahem.
                                Originally posted by Thrash13
                                Dr. Jones was right in stating that. We should have believed him.
                                Originally posted by slickdtc
                                DrJones brings the stinky cheese is what we've all learned from this debacle.
                                Originally posted by Kipnis22
                                yes your fantasy world when your proven wrong about 95% of your post

                                Comment

                                Working...