Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
As to how the vote actually goes down this year (75% needed for induction): Dawson barely makes it, Blyleven barely misses out (and will make it in 2011), none of the noobs make it on the first try. Alomar will get 60-65%, Larkin a little less, Edgar and Crime Dog will be in the 40-55% range.
If the spitting incident is gonna cost Alomar his induction then these writers hold grudges to the point of absurdity. It's all water under the bridge between Alomar and the umpire don't you think we should let bygones be bygones?Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club
"Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. ParkerComment
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
If they're not voting in McGwire in what makes you think Alomar gets in. For the writers it's essentially the same thing.Comment
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
Totally different situations IMOMember of the Official OS Bills Backers Club
"Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. ParkerComment
-
Originally posted by Thrash13Dr. Jones was right in stating that. We should have believed him.Originally posted by slickdtcDrJones brings the stinky cheese is what we've all learned from this debacle.Originally posted by Kipnis22yes your fantasy world when your proven wrong about 95% of your postComment
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
How do you not have Alomar not making it in on the first ballot. The guy was the greatest 2B of his generation. Hell, during his prime people were favorably comparing him to Joe Morgan fer cryin' out loud!
If the spitting incident is gonna cost Alomar his induction then these writers hold grudges to the point of absurdity. It's all water under the bridge between Alomar and the umpire don't you think we should let bygones be bygones?
Take a look at HOF ballots over the last couple of decades. Only absolute no-brainers or those who are extraordinarily popular (Puckett) get in on their first try. There are still writers who won't vote for ANYBODY on the first ballot out of "principle". Trust me, it ain't happening. Robbie will have to wait a year or two to become the first Blue Jay in Cooperstown.Originally posted by Thrash13Dr. Jones was right in stating that. We should have believed him.Originally posted by slickdtcDrJones brings the stinky cheese is what we've all learned from this debacle.Originally posted by Kipnis22yes your fantasy world when your proven wrong about 95% of your postComment
-
Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club
"Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. ParkerComment
-
Originally posted by Thrash13Dr. Jones was right in stating that. We should have believed him.Originally posted by slickdtcDrJones brings the stinky cheese is what we've all learned from this debacle.Originally posted by Kipnis22yes your fantasy world when your proven wrong about 95% of your postComment
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
What about Lee Smith? 478 saves and he started his career when the closer position wasn't en vogue.
The man was a 7 time all-star and would easily had over 500 saves if he played in todays era.http://flotn.blogspot.com
Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club
Originally posted by trobinson97Hell, I shot my grandmother, cuz she was old.Comment
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
I think Lee Smith would be a pretty mediocre-to-awful addition. I do have a bit of an anti save/closer bias though, considering how much more valuable even a decent starter can be and how ridiculously overrated the save statistic is.
Throw out the save stat and what's the difference between Lee Smith and a reliever like Roberto Hernandez? Or Jeff Reardon? Or Doug Jones? Or any number of other pretty good relievers? They're all basically interchangeable.Last edited by snepp; 11-29-2009, 05:02 AM.Member of The OS Baseball Rocket Scientists AssociationComment
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
I think Lee Smith would be a pretty mediocre-to-awful addition. I do have a bit of an anti save/closer bias though, considering how much more valuable even a decent starter can be and how ridiculously overrated the save statistic is.
Throw out the save stat and what's the difference between Lee Smith and a reliever like Roberto Hernandez? Or Jeff Reardon? Or Doug Jones? Or any number of other pretty good relievers? They're all basically interchangeable.Originally posted by Thrash13Dr. Jones was right in stating that. We should have believed him.Originally posted by slickdtcDrJones brings the stinky cheese is what we've all learned from this debacle.Originally posted by Kipnis22yes your fantasy world when your proven wrong about 95% of your postComment
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
I'd love to see Barry Larkin get in - but that's because he is my all time favorite player!
MICHIGAN WOLVERINES
1901 | 1902 | 1903 | 1904 | 1918 | 1923 | 1932 | 1933 | 1947 | 1948 | 1997 | 2023
MONTREAL CANADIENS
1916 | 1924 | 1930 | 1931 | 1944 | 1946 | 1953 | 1956 | 1957 | 1958 | 1959 | 1960 | 1965
1966 | 1968 | 1971 | 1973 | 1976 | 1977 | 1978 | 1979 | 1986 | 1993
Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
As to how the vote actually goes down this year (75% needed for induction): Dawson barely makes it, Blyleven barely misses out (and will make it in 2011), none of the noobs make it on the first try. Alomar will get 60-65%, Larkin a little less, Edgar and Crime Dog will be in the 40-55% range.Originally posted by Thrash13Dr. Jones was right in stating that. We should have believed him.Originally posted by slickdtcDrJones brings the stinky cheese is what we've all learned from this debacle.Originally posted by Kipnis22yes your fantasy world when your proven wrong about 95% of your postComment
Comment