Yankees after Beltran

[BatsareBugs]

Re: Yankees after Beltran

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
bkrich83 said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Rag3vsW0rld said:
Burroughs is not expendable... I've heard the rumor between Burroughs and Nady for Beltran and Randa and KT would be hung for that. Burroughs is a very popular player and is not worth giving up for a two-three month rental that gets us a below average third basemen. Don't look for the Padres getting Beltran, I'd rather see them use those prospects they have for some other players.

Another note, Barfield is as good as gone there is a trade.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

If the Padres could sign Beltran to a multi-year contract, they would send Burroughs, Nady and possibly Klesko to KC for Beltran and Randa in a heart beat. Might have to toss in a pitching prospect, but they are pretty deep with young pitchers also.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

None of Boras's clients have signed a multi-year contract with a team that they were traded to before in their final year of their contract. I'm not counting on it because the Padres will surely lose Beltran in free agency if the slim chances of resigning Beltran doesn't happen all because of Boras. Burroughs (can only get better), Nady (has yet to prove himself), Klesko (does he still have it), plus pitching prospects is a little too much for Beltran and Randa... one star player and a mediocre player.

[BatsareBugs]

Re: Yankees after Beltran

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
K_GUN said:
does anyone think the yanks might give up some of their offense for a marquee pitcher

eg..sheffield for pavano type trade?

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

Maybe, since they don't really have any prospects.

[BatsareBugs]

Re: Yankees after Beltran

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
K_GUN said:
does anyone think the yanks might give up some of their offense for a marquee pitcher

eg..sheffield for pavano type trade?

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

Maybe, since they don't really have any prospects.

[BatsareBugs]

Re: Yankees after Beltran

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
K_GUN said:
does anyone think the yanks might give up some of their offense for a marquee pitcher

eg..sheffield for pavano type trade?

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

Maybe, since they don't really have any prospects.

[NYJets]

Re: Yankees after Beltran

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
K_GUN said:
does anyone think the yanks might give up some of their offense for a marquee pitcher

eg..sheffield for pavano type trade?

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

I doubt it, most of the teams who will be trading good pitchers aren't looking for old high priced veterans in return.

[NYJets]

Re: Yankees after Beltran

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
K_GUN said:
does anyone think the yanks might give up some of their offense for a marquee pitcher

eg..sheffield for pavano type trade?

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

I doubt it, most of the teams who will be trading good pitchers aren't looking for old high priced veterans in return.

[NYJets]

Re: Yankees after Beltran

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
K_GUN said:
does anyone think the yanks might give up some of their offense for a marquee pitcher

eg..sheffield for pavano type trade?

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

I doubt it, most of the teams who will be trading good pitchers aren't looking for old high priced veterans in return.

[jt45]

Re: Yankees after Beltran

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
bkrich83 said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Rag3vsW0rld said:
Burroughs is not expendable... I've heard the rumor between Burroughs and Nady for Beltran and Randa and KT would be hung for that. Burroughs is a very popular player and is not worth giving up for a two-three month rental that gets us a below average third basemen. Don't look for the Padres getting Beltran, I'd rather see them use those prospects they have for some other players.

Another note, Barfield is as good as gone there is a trade.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

If the Padres could sign Beltran to a multi-year contract, they would send Burroughs, Nady and possibly Klesko to KC for Beltran and Randa in a heart beat. Might have to toss in a pitching prospect, but they are pretty deep with young pitchers also.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

San Diego isn't going to deal Klesko. First off, he's a 10-5 players so he can veto any deal and secondly, they need his bat in the lineup.

[jt45]

Re: Yankees after Beltran

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
bkrich83 said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Rag3vsW0rld said:
Burroughs is not expendable... I've heard the rumor between Burroughs and Nady for Beltran and Randa and KT would be hung for that. Burroughs is a very popular player and is not worth giving up for a two-three month rental that gets us a below average third basemen. Don't look for the Padres getting Beltran, I'd rather see them use those prospects they have for some other players.

Another note, Barfield is as good as gone there is a trade.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

If the Padres could sign Beltran to a multi-year contract, they would send Burroughs, Nady and possibly Klesko to KC for Beltran and Randa in a heart beat. Might have to toss in a pitching prospect, but they are pretty deep with young pitchers also.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

San Diego isn't going to deal Klesko. First off, he's a 10-5 players so he can veto any deal and secondly, they need his bat in the lineup.

[jt45]

Re: Yankees after Beltran

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
bkrich83 said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Rag3vsW0rld said:
Burroughs is not expendable... I've heard the rumor between Burroughs and Nady for Beltran and Randa and KT would be hung for that. Burroughs is a very popular player and is not worth giving up for a two-three month rental that gets us a below average third basemen. Don't look for the Padres getting Beltran, I'd rather see them use those prospects they have for some other players.

Another note, Barfield is as good as gone there is a trade.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

If the Padres could sign Beltran to a multi-year contract, they would send Burroughs, Nady and possibly Klesko to KC for Beltran and Randa in a heart beat. Might have to toss in a pitching prospect, but they are pretty deep with young pitchers also.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

San Diego isn't going to deal Klesko. First off, he's a 10-5 players so he can veto any deal and secondly, they need his bat in the lineup.

[jt45]

Re: Yankees after Beltran

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
dieselboy said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
bkrich83 said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Rag3vsW0rld said:
Burroughs is not expendable... I've heard the rumor between Burroughs and Nady for Beltran and Randa and KT would be hung for that. Burroughs is a very popular player and is not worth giving up for a two-three month rental that gets us a below average third basemen. Don't look for the Padres getting Beltran, I'd rather see them use those prospects they have for some other players.

Another note, Barfield is as good as gone there is a trade.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

If the Padres could sign Beltran to a multi-year contract, they would send Burroughs, Nady and possibly Klesko to KC for Beltran and Randa in a heart beat. Might have to toss in a pitching prospect, but they are pretty deep with young pitchers also.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

If I'm KC, I make that deal asap.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

Barfield/Nady/Burroughs for Randa and Beltran is the most likely deal to go down.

[jt45]

Re: Yankees after Beltran

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
dieselboy said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
bkrich83 said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Rag3vsW0rld said:
Burroughs is not expendable... I've heard the rumor between Burroughs and Nady for Beltran and Randa and KT would be hung for that. Burroughs is a very popular player and is not worth giving up for a two-three month rental that gets us a below average third basemen. Don't look for the Padres getting Beltran, I'd rather see them use those prospects they have for some other players.

Another note, Barfield is as good as gone there is a trade.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

If the Padres could sign Beltran to a multi-year contract, they would send Burroughs, Nady and possibly Klesko to KC for Beltran and Randa in a heart beat. Might have to toss in a pitching prospect, but they are pretty deep with young pitchers also.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

If I'm KC, I make that deal asap.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

Barfield/Nady/Burroughs for Randa and Beltran is the most likely deal to go down.

[jt45]

Re: Yankees after Beltran

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
dieselboy said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
bkrich83 said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Rag3vsW0rld said:
Burroughs is not expendable... I've heard the rumor between Burroughs and Nady for Beltran and Randa and KT would be hung for that. Burroughs is a very popular player and is not worth giving up for a two-three month rental that gets us a below average third basemen. Don't look for the Padres getting Beltran, I'd rather see them use those prospects they have for some other players.

Another note, Barfield is as good as gone there is a trade.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

If the Padres could sign Beltran to a multi-year contract, they would send Burroughs, Nady and possibly Klesko to KC for Beltran and Randa in a heart beat. Might have to toss in a pitching prospect, but they are pretty deep with young pitchers also.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

If I'm KC, I make that deal asap.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

Barfield/Nady/Burroughs for Randa and Beltran is the most likely deal to go down.

[jt45]

Re: Yankees after Beltran

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
K_GUN said:
does anyone think the yanks might give up some of their offense for a marquee pitcher

eg..sheffield for pavano type trade?

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

No, the Yanks aren't going to trade Sheffield or any of their big bats. If anything they will buy some expensive players in exchange for low level prospects (ie. what they did when they got Mondesi). They could pay all of Kris Benson's or Garcia's deal in exchange for low level prospects. Thats the most likely type of deal the Yanks will pull.

[jt45]

Re: Yankees after Beltran

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
K_GUN said:
does anyone think the yanks might give up some of their offense for a marquee pitcher

eg..sheffield for pavano type trade?

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

No, the Yanks aren't going to trade Sheffield or any of their big bats. If anything they will buy some expensive players in exchange for low level prospects (ie. what they did when they got Mondesi). They could pay all of Kris Benson's or Garcia's deal in exchange for low level prospects. Thats the most likely type of deal the Yanks will pull.