When playing against the computer in association I play mostly man defense.
When playing against a human I play mostly zone.
Fact is the way man defense / help defense works on this game combined with how people typically play on offense makes zone defense the better choice on average. Any competent player can force me out of zone by adapting their offense exploiting the natural weaknesses that come from playing zone. However most users will just stick with their normal, easily defended with zone, gameplan and make no adjustments. Then bang their heads against the wall and cry that the 1-3-1 is impossible to score against. Perfect example my roommate who has a pretty good online record always controls the Center and usually runs zone. He gets away with it because rarely does anyone have the discipline to constantly attack him with a post player. They'll just allow him to roam around with the Center all game.
NBA teams in real life don't play very much zone. But NBA teams in real life also don't run offenses the way players do on NBA2k. I'm going to choose the defense that best responds to the offense my opponent chooses. If that means sitting in zone all day and playing an offball defender so be it. I'm not going to try to prove how manly I am by sitting in man-on-man and playing onball if it's not working, or if there are better options.
Comment