MVP Discussions

[X*Cell]

Re: MVP Discussions

[DTX3]

Re: MVP Discussions

exactly, you didn't watch it at all, so don't make an assessment about Roy when he played his heart out, and WITHOUT LaMarcus Aldridge. I don't personally know the guy, but every way he played tonight would definitely warrant him 4th on the MVP ballot.

You must have skipped this part.

And again, my first comment was directed towards those two sick hooks James put on Roy.

I'm sorry If I hurt your feelings.

[X*Cell]

Re: MVP Discussions

You must have skipped this part.



I'm sorry If I hurt your feelings.

that doesn't explain why Roy isn't the 4th best MVP to me. I don't think you understand that I have LeBron at #1 and he is capable of finishing like that against anyone... even Kobe Bryant.

[23]

Re: MVP Discussions

DTX dude calm down man

[DTX3]

Re: MVP Discussions

that doesn't explain why Roy isn't the 4th best MVP to me. I don't think you understand that I have LeBron at #1 and he is capable of finishing like that against anyone... even Kobe Bryant.

My top five looks like this.

LeCrab
Wade

Mamba
Howard
CP3

[ProfessaPackMan]

Re: MVP Discussions

Why are ya'll still talking about Roy when ya'll know dude has no chance of winning it?

LOL goodness it's almost like folks are refusing to believe 1+1 = 2.

[X*Cell]

Re: MVP Discussions

Why are ya'll still talking about Roy when ya'll know dude has no chance of winning it?

LOL goodness it's almost like folks are refusing to believe 1+1 = 2.

why do you keep shooting us down for putting him 4th on a ballot of 5 players... which is standard for MVP voting? Whether or not we think he can win MVP (I don't), I'm just going by the blueprint. If anything, you are the one dragging this way too far.

[JBH3]

Re: MVP Discussions

why do you keep shooting us down for putting him 4th on a ballot of 5 players... which is standard for MVP voting? Whether or not we think he can win MVP (I don't), I'm just going by the blueprint. If anything, you are the one dragging this way too far.

Isn't the title of this thread funny?

It states "MVP Discussion".

However, any "discussion" regarding any player other than KING James, and you're burned at the stake for even fathoming someone else could possibly win, or in your case can stand in his shadow.

[ProfessaPackMan]

Re: MVP Discussions

why do you keep shooting us down for putting him 4th on a ballot of 5 players... which is standard for MVP voting? Whether or not we think he can win MVP (I don't), I'm just going by the blueprint. If anything, you are the one dragging this way too far.

Yea ok. Don't try to put this on me because it really shouldn't have even continued this long in the first place.

And even if 5 did matter(which realistically the only ones that'll matter are 1-3)why should Roy be mentioned in there over guys like CP3 or Dwight or even Paul Pierce and Chauncey Billups?

Isn't the title of this thread funny?

It states "MVP Discussion".

However, any "discussion" regarding any player other than KING James, and you're burned at the stake for even fathoming someone else could possibly win, or in your case can stand in his shadow.

Going by this, can I call Gilbert Arenas an MVP candidate since it's obvious the Wizards wouldn't be this bad without him?

Or what about Devin Harris? Mo Williams? Joe Johnson?

But I see how it is. Because the title says "MVP Discussion" that's basically a green light for people to start throwing names out there even though they already know they have no chance of winning it but we're just going to throw names out just because. Gotcha now.

[X*Cell]

Re: MVP Discussions

Yea ok. Don't try to put this on me because it really shouldn't have even continued this long in the first place.

And even if 5 did matter(which realistically the only ones that'll matter are 1-3)why should Roy be mentioned in there over guys like CP3 or Dwight or even Paul Pierce and Chauncey Billups?

I've already explained and statistically backed up why Roy should be 4th. Why don't you answer you're own question by actually providing analysis to back up your sentiments?

And you obviously missed the part where I said that the MVP race is 3-man battle between LeBron, Wade, and Kobe. I'm just going by the book and listing my top 5, even though it's crystal clear that the latter 2 guys have no shot at it... in my case Roy and Howard.

[JBH3]

Re: MVP Discussions

Yea ok. Don't try to put this on me because it really shouldn't have even continued this long in the first place.

And even if 5 did matter(which realistically the only ones that'll matter are 1-3)why should Roy be mentioned in there over guys like CP3 or Dwight or even Paul Pierce and Chauncey Billups?


Going by this, can I call Gilbert Arenas an MVP candidate since it's obvious the Wizards wouldn't be this bad without him?

Or what about Devin Harris? Mo Williams? Joe Johnson?

But I see how it is. Because the title says "MVP Discussion" that's basically a green light for people to start throwing names out there even though they already know they have no chance of winning it but we're just going to throw names out just because. Gotcha now.

Logic much.

Since it's a unanimous majority lets just close the thread then.

[DC]

Re: MVP Discussions

I've already explained and statistically backed up why Roy should be 4th. Why don't you answer you're own question by actually providing anal

As if that is enough.

1. He isn't having a better season statistically than Dwight or CP3

2. You can make stats say anything

[JBH3]

Re: MVP Discussions



DC....Find it hard to believe you accidentally left out the "ysis" of his sentence.

[DC]

Re: MVP Discussions

That is funny as hell. I did NOT do that on purpose

[X*Cell]

Re: MVP Discussions

As if that is enough.

1. He isn't having a better season statistically than Dwight or CP3

2. You can make stats say anything

And then I proceeded to own the guy who claimed that LeBron lit up Roy last night, which never happened. Sidenote: clever use of slander DC... very clever. You made me laugh.