NBA Lockout and Collective Bargaining Agreement Discussion

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • OSUFan_88
    Outback Jesus
    • Jul 2004
    • 25642

    #4351
    Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Bargaining Agreement Discussion

    Originally posted by Taur3asi3
    I'd honestly feel better if they didn't let Fisher within 50 miles of the room.
    Fisher attending means that decertification or filing whatever they filed doesn't mean much. Basically, it ruins all of their court battles.

    So a deal better be in place.
    Too Old To Game Club

    Urban Meyer is lol.

    Comment

    • The 24th Letter
      ERA
      • Oct 2007
      • 39373

      #4352
      Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Bargaining Agreement Discussion

      Just now seeing Stevensons comments...dude is so lame...

      He most likely has no idea what he's talking about.....

      Comment

      • Mintsa
        All Star
        • Aug 2002
        • 6667

        #4353
        Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Bargaining Agreement Discussion

        Is today's meeting going to be another 12 hour marathon ? Or more of a "cut to the chase" type of meeting ?

        Comment

        • Iman416
          Rookie
          • Nov 2011
          • 60

          #4354
          Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Bargaining Agreement Discussion

          Originally posted by Mintsa
          Is today's meeting going to be another 12 hour marathon ? Or more of a "cut to the chase" type of meeting ?
          man I really hope its not another 12 hour shift

          Comment

          • aholbert32
            (aka Alberto)
            • Jul 2002
            • 33106

            #4355
            Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Bargaining Agreement Discussion

            Originally posted by OSUFan_88
            Fisher attending means that decertification or filing whatever they filed doesn't mean much. Basically, it ruins all of their court battles.

            So a deal better be in place.
            Thats why the Broussard tweets confuse me. The NBA's primary argument is that the disclaimer of interest is a sham and that the union is still basically in place. Now you can justify having Hunter and Kessler because they technically are on the legal team for the lawsuit. How do you justify Fisher?

            Fisher isn't a party to the lawsuit, he isn't a lawyer and the union doesn't exist. That leads me to believe that a deal has to be close. If it isn't, then Hunter/Kessler/Boies have to be some of the dumbest lawyers ive ever seen.

            Comment

            • Iman416
              Rookie
              • Nov 2011
              • 60

              #4356
              Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Bargaining Agreement Discussion

              Baron Davis 'optimistic' lockout will end



              "I'm optimistic. I'm very optimistic that there will be a season," he told 710 ESPN's John Ireland and Mychal Thompson. "You've just got to keep hoping, and just keep waiting patiently, and I think that both sides will figure it out.

              http://espn.go.com/los-angeles/nba/s...t-kyrie-irving

              Comment

              • Iman416
                Rookie
                • Nov 2011
                • 60

                #4357
                Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Bargaining Agreement Discussion

                Lockout Buzz 11.25.11: Black Friday Push




                11:00 a.m.


                • Ken Berger reports that Kessler will not be in attendance, but will be "involved." That's still a great sign. Kessler's real problem was his interaction with Stern et al. His involvement in an advisory capacity is a good thing for the players, it gives them a strong voice who isn't concilliatory. But Quinn being on the forefront is a much better approach.

                • Ric Bucher of ESPN reported last night on SportsCenter that David Stern could give the players yet another ultimatum during today's meeting. Bucher reports that Stern could threaten to cancel the entire season if a deal isn't struck to save the Christmas games.


                10:10 a.m.

                • Ken Berger of CBSSports.com reports that Derek Fisher will join the talks in New York Friday. Fisher's presence could simply be a legal formality to avoid a "sham" argument from the league if they were just dealing with lawyers, or it could signal a desire to have a player rep in the room if a handshake deal is presented.


                • And now for the bad news (I know, I know, it's like "Death Becomes Her," "Now a warning?"). Chris Broussard of ESPN.com reported Saturday night a list of the player's demands for this negotiating session. The players must feel that the threat of their antitrust lawsuit really has pushed the owners into a new state of reasonable discourse or at least shaken them a bit. Either that or they're high. Because's it's nuts.

                • How about the big non-starter, an increase in max salaries, from 20 percent to 30 percent, and increased qualifiying offers for restricted free agents? It's like the players are just ignoring that nearly half of this ridiculous situation is due to the summer of 2010 and the power of players like LeBron James and Carmelo Anthony. And raising the QO is a decent enough idea to not trap players into another year with a team, but as it raises salary amounts when the entire structure of the negotiation is geared at keeping costs as low as possible, it's hard to see this being anything the owners will move on.

                • Now, some of the other elements the players want are doable. Broussard reports that they want increase on the mini-MLE which the owners have reportedly already softened on. The sign-and-trade for tax teams for the life of the deal is such a small deal affecting so few transactions that quite simply, not even these two collections of geniuses can blow up a deal for it. And the so-called "repeater tax" is a new enough concept to allow for some movement on both sides. If the max and QO elements are built to be face-savers, with the deal coming down to the MLE, sign-and-trade, and repeater tax, it's possible there could be enough room for movement.

                • The last element Broussard reported was a higher MLE for non-tax teams than proposed, and a cap at 10 percent on the escrow payments. That's already a concession from the players, who last wanted an 8 percent cap. 10 percent was the reported target of the owners, so that should be doable. You know, like getting a deal back in July should have been doable. The MLE is likely a non-starter as well.

                Comment

                • CMH
                  Making you famous
                  • Oct 2002
                  • 26203

                  #4358
                  The only thing I can think of is the players are asking for two ridiculous things so that the owners will take the reasonable proponents instead.

                  Or as the article stated: the players are high.


                  Sent from my mobile device.
                  "It may well be that we spectators, who are not divinely gifted as athletes, are the only ones able to truly see, articulate and animate the experience of the gift we are denied. And that those who receive and act out the gift of athletic genius must, perforce, be blind and dumb about it -- and not because blindness and dumbness are the price of the gift, but because they are its essence." - David Foster Wallace

                  "You'll not find more penny-wise/pound-foolish behavior than in Major League Baseball." - Rob Neyer

                  Comment

                  • BlueNGold
                    Hall Of Fame
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 21817

                    #4359
                    Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Bargaining Agreement Discussion

                    This isn't going to happen. I can already tell. Guess I'm going to have to resort to 2K12 for any NBA fix.

                    EDIT: Here's the thing though, I'd rather they make the right deal and fix the issues hurting the league (mainly protecting the owners from their own dumb ****ing selves so they can stop giving the Ben Gordon's, Al Harrington's, and Rashard Lewis' of the basketball world ridiculous amounts of money) than put a bandaid over all of this just to squeeze out a shortened season in time for Christmas Day games. There's just not much point in that at all and it would be yet another step backwards in a situation where they're basically one step back from falling off the cliff.
                    Last edited by BlueNGold; 11-25-2011, 12:33 PM.
                    Originally posted by bradtxmale
                    I like 6 inches. Its not too thin and not too thick. You get the support your body needs.



                    Comment

                    • mjbird123
                      Pro
                      • Feb 2011
                      • 809

                      #4360
                      Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Bargaining Agreement Discussion

                      It will be my Christmas miracle if they reach an agreement, and have a 66 game season.

                      Comment

                      • Bondgirl0072
                        Banned
                        • Jul 2010
                        • 1138

                        #4361
                        Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Bargaining Agreement Discussion

                        Sources: New NBA talks aim to resolve suits


                        The sides in the NBA labor dispute, which reached its 146th day Wednesday, have re-opened negotiations to make one last run at trying to start the season on Christmas Day.

                        Comment

                        • glover20064
                          Pro
                          • Sep 2010
                          • 668

                          #4362
                          Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Bargaining Agreement Discussion

                          Originally posted by BlueNGold
                          This isn't going to happen. I can already tell. Guess I'm going to have to resort to 2K12 for any NBA fix.

                          EDIT: Here's the thing though, I'd rather they make the right deal and fix the issues hurting the league (mainly protecting the owners from their own dumb ****ing selves so they can stop giving the Ben Gordon's, Al Harrington's, and Rashard Lewis' of the basketball world ridiculous amounts of money) than put a bandaid over all of this just to squeeze out a shortened season in time for Christmas Day games. There's just not much point in that at all and it would be yet another step backwards in a situation where they're basically one step back from falling off the cliff.
                          this is how i feel aswel i rather not have a season then get a semi bad deal for the owners and where just back here in 6 years again.

                          Comment

                          • 23
                            yellow
                            • Sep 2002
                            • 66469

                            #4363
                            Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Bargaining Agreement Discussion

                            If Kessler is involved then they're not going to come to a deal

                            Comment

                            • cmebfresh
                              Pro
                              • Jan 2011
                              • 930

                              #4364
                              Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Bargaining Agreement Discussion

                              got a feeling deal gets done this weekend, i feel the NBA really don't want to pay the television programs. and kessler is not in the room 'THANk U'
                              "Sometimes i sit and piss myself" - Quote Cmebfresh

                              MIAMI ALL THE WAY

                              MIAMI HEAT
                              MIAMI DOLPHINS
                              MIAMI MARLINS
                              AND THE U

                              Comment

                              • TheMatrix31
                                RF
                                • Jul 2002
                                • 52900

                                #4365
                                Re: NBA Lockout and Collective Bargaining Agreement Discussion

                                Stern and owners are pathetic.

                                How many empty threat about a reset are you gonna make?

                                Sooner or later, they won't be taken seriously. I know I don't take "reset" seriously anymore. Whatta joke.

                                Comment

                                Working...