Uhhhhhhh with the top pick even if you really need a Center you dont pick Embiid over Randle, Wiggins, or Parker. Talent>Need.
2014 Draft Discussion
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: 2014 Draft Class
Uhhhhhhh with the top pick even if you really need a Center you dont pick Embiid over Randle, Wiggins, or Parker. Talent>Need. -
I don't know. Whenever I've seen WCS play, I've thought he outhustled most of the players on the court. I see him beat the other team's guards down the court a lot.
Regarding Wiggins, I thought he looked pretty good on both ends today. Definitely a step up from the past couple games.
I only caught the last 8 minutes or so. Wiggins kept getting took off the dribble. Fatigue could have been a factor at that point though.Last edited by ojandpizza; 12-07-2013, 07:43 PM.Comment
-
Re: 2014 Draft Class
I just can't think of any of the teams who should pick Randle over Parker or probably even Wiggins and Smart.. Maybe a team who already has lots of talent.. I just think he'll develop a little slower on the next stage. Don't see him being the immediate go-to rookie some of these other guys might be.Comment
-
Re: 2014 Draft Class
what if you already have a SF and PF you want already? i cant think of a single team who would be picking #1 who has said lineup off the top of my head but if they really want a center who knows.. i dont think he will be top 3, but i wont be suprised if he isComment
-
Re: 2014 Draft Class
Don't forget Marcus Smart. Depending on the team, he could go from 2 to any position. Yet I think Jabari is a lock for 1. He's crazy. Wiggins is a bit of a gamble imo, he could turn out as the best player in his class (which means franchise player) but also could turn out as an athletic swingman only. I also have Randle on 2 right now, he's a bigman with skill, teams drafting high love that.
I wish for the Kings to get a high lottery pick...they are fun to watch already and they are losing. They're Marcus Smart away from becoming serious business.Comment
-
Re: 2014 Draft Class
eh, i think sac takes parker or randle over smart, they need an upgrade in all 3 spots, so you just take best player thereComment
-
Re: 2014 Draft Class
Picking need over talent has never done anyone any good ever.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: 2014 Draft Class
what im saying is you DONT take the best talent if you dont need it..
thats essentially saying the blazers would take a PG because hes the best player, but what purpose would that serve them.Comment
-
Re: 2014 Draft Class
Historically taking need over the best player there. There's far more cases that lead on the talent side.Comment
-
Re: 2014 Draft Class
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
Re: 2014 Draft Class
Regarding the need/talent thing, like Ex said there are obvious exceptions, but you pick the most talented player and try and make it work. If you have a top SF already but have a chance to get Wiggins or Parker you take them over reaching for someone that fits a "need". In the NBA more than any other sport, a star can change the complete outlook of a franchise, and for the teams that can't get the top FA's, you have to take that chance.Cincinnati Reds University of Kentucky Cincinnati Bengals
@GoReds1994Comment
-
Re: 2014 Draft Class
well, nerlens wont do anything but be a help blocker unless he puts on 15 pouounds thats for sure.. i didnt watch alot of kentucky but i watched enough to see he is severely limited offensivelyComment
Comment