2016 NBA Offseason Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Boltman
    L.A. to S.D. to HI
    • Mar 2004
    • 18283

    #4021
    re: 2016 NBA Offseason Thread

    I wonder if teams that have no shot of making the post season are going to completely bring their best the night they play GSW. I also wonder if it'll even make a difference.

    Comment

    • jfsolo
      Live Action, please?
      • May 2003
      • 12965

      #4022
      re: 2016 NBA Offseason Thread

      Originally posted by ojandpizza
      I think it's funny that Chuck said he and Malone could have "cheated" their way to a title like "today's players" are.

      Ummmm, didn't you both try that? lmao


      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
      It's crazy to me that a lot of people actually think that it's a reasonable take to find the Barkley to Houston, and especially Malone to L.A. even the slightest bit comparable to this situation? Really?
      Jordan Mychal Lemos
      @crypticjordan

      Do this today: Instead of $%*#!@& on a game you're not going to play or movie you're not going to watch, say something good about a piece of media you're excited about.

      Do the same thing tomorrow. And the next. Now do it forever.

      Comment

      • cima
        Hall Of Fame
        • Sep 2004
        • 13478

        #4023
        re: 2016 NBA Offseason Thread

        Originally posted by jfsolo
        It's crazy to me that a lot of people actually think that it's a reasonable take to find the Barkley to Houston, and especially Malone to L.A. even the slightest bit comparable to this situation? Really?
        Totally cause ya know, Barkley and Malone were definitely in their primes when they joined Houston and LA respectively. So it's easily the same thing.

        Comment

        • Boltman
          L.A. to S.D. to HI
          • Mar 2004
          • 18283

          #4024
          re: 2016 NBA Offseason Thread

          They aren't comparable, in my eyes anyways.

          Comment

          • areobee401
            Hall Of Fame
            • Apr 2006
            • 16771

            #4025
            re: 2016 NBA Offseason Thread

            Rag on KD for joining a loaded GSW team in order to put himself in the best position to win a ring when fans, talk radio pundits and sports media put such a heavy emphasis on how many rings a player has to determine their place in history.

            Seems hypocritical to me.
            http://twitter.com/smittyroberts

            Comment

            • ProfessaPackMan
              Bamma
              • Mar 2008
              • 63852

              #4026
              re: 2016 NBA Offseason Thread

              Originally posted by Boltman
              I wonder if teams that have no shot of making the post season are going to completely bring their best the night they play GSW. I also wonder if it'll even make a difference.
              I just wanna beat the Knicks, Lakers, Bulls and Spurs.

              If we sweep them, that's like winning the championship in my eyes.
              #RespectTheCulture

              Comment

              • extremeskins04
                That's top class!
                • Aug 2010
                • 3868

                #4027
                re: 2016 NBA Offseason Thread

                Originally posted by areobee401
                Rag on KD for joining a loaded GSW team in order to position himself in the best position to win a ring when fans, talk radio pundits and sports media put such a heavy emphasis on how many rings a player has to determine their place in history.

                Seems hypocritical to me.
                There's a bit of a difference here though. He just played GSW in the finals being up 3-1 and then got beat, and then he's going to join that team? OKC was perfectly capable of beating them but they didn't.

                It's just being a bit weak is all. In my eyes, if he wins this year with GSW I believe there will be that * next to his name in the championship.

                It would be a totally different story if he went to the Spurs or Clippers, etc. Even though the Spurs are a 63 win team, it's different still.

                Comment

                • King_B_Mack
                  All Star
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 24450

                  #4028
                  re: 2016 NBA Offseason Thread

                  So who's left of note after Wade?


                  Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                  Comment

                  • cima
                    Hall Of Fame
                    • Sep 2004
                    • 13478

                    #4029
                    re: 2016 NBA Offseason Thread

                    Originally posted by ProfessaPackMan
                    I gotcha man.

                    Planning 2 years in advance to go play with your best friends on another team = Good. "BUT HE WANTED TO WIN AND WANTED TO GET RINGSZZZZZ!"

                    Leaving your team to go join a team who had the best record in the regular season and played in the Finals = Cardinal Sin of Basketball.
                    Not really sure what you're trying to accomplish here. Forming a big three on a team that wasn't already tailored to win and had to be filled out with minimum contracts isn't quite the same as joining an already existing big 3 with quality depth that just won the most regular season games ever.

                    *sips tea*

                    Comment

                    • King_B_Mack
                      All Star
                      • Jan 2009
                      • 24450

                      #4030
                      re: 2016 NBA Offseason Thread

                      Originally posted by ProfessaPackMan
                      I just wanna beat the Knicks, Lakers, Bulls and Spurs.



                      If we sweep them, that's like winning the championship in my eyes.

                      Hey man, what we do to you? We out here in this hot *** field with no water too.



                      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                      Comment

                      • Justin7
                        Pro
                        • Oct 2014
                        • 533

                        #4031
                        re: 2016 NBA Offseason Thread

                        Can't we all just agree 50% of us think it was weak and easy way out and the other 50% understand the decision and don't think it affects his legacy? Feels like we been talking about this for 100 pages and not going anywhere lol. Although not much else to talk about.

                        Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

                        Comment

                        • The 24th Letter
                          ERA
                          • Oct 2007
                          • 39373

                          #4032
                          re: 2016 NBA Offseason Thread

                          Originally posted by King_B_Mack
                          So who's left of note after Wade?


                          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                          LeBron James technically, lol

                          I dunno though, Dion Waiters?

                          Comment

                          • BleacherBum2310
                            All Star
                            • Aug 2010
                            • 7107

                            #4033
                            re: 2016 NBA Offseason Thread

                            Originally posted by extremeskins04
                            There's a bit of a difference here though. He just played GSW in the finals being up 3-1 and then got beat, and then he's going to join that team? OKC was perfectly capable of beating them but they didn't.

                            It's just being a bit weak is all. In my eyes, if he wins this year with GSW I believe there will be that * next to his name in the championship.

                            It would be a totally different story if he went to the Spurs or Clippers, etc. Even though the Spurs are a 63 win team, it's different still.
                            lol what. That's a load of crap.
                            Wolverines Packers Cubs Celtics

                            Comment

                            • ProfessaPackMan
                              Bamma
                              • Mar 2008
                              • 63852

                              #4034
                              re: 2016 NBA Offseason Thread

                              I know, man.

                              I know. I'll just sit back and watch the double standards and hypocrisy to continue like it has since Monday.

                              *guzzles Budweiser like Stone Cold*
                              #RespectTheCulture

                              Comment

                              • 23
                                yellow
                                • Sep 2002
                                • 66469

                                #4035
                                re: 2016 NBA Offseason Thread

                                Originally posted by ProfessaPackMan
                                Us Sports Fans love putting qualifications on everything, especially NBA Fans lol.

                                To be a HOF, you must:

                                -Take 1 pay cut at minimum

                                -Lead a team from last place to the Finals in 2 years or less.

                                -Play with the same team for at least 10 consecutive years.

                                -Not change shoe contracts

                                -Not make max contract money.

                                What else am I missing?
                                Not play for the Warriors

                                Comment

                                Working...