It doesn't bother you for the same reasons it doesn't bother me; our fandom is the same and it's far different from the rest of OS. Pretty sure we are the only MJ/LeBron fans on here. I'm sure you don't like being grouped with me because I've been hypocritical and hyperbolic at times, and I'm not saying you have been, but clearly you and I are the biggest LeBron fans on here and apparently we also share the MJ admiration as well. I love comparing the two because they are my two faves and they're both dominant in different ways. You can throw these things out there about both guys and I'm not gonna get offended or upset about it because I like em both.
The graphic's intent is up for interpretation...for us, it's just a side-by-side comparison of our favorite players of what they accomplished by age 31. For Bulls' fans and such, they could see it at yet again someone trying to compare their GOAT to someone who (and they don't want to admit this) could surpass MJ as the GOAT when he retires. It's like when we got media/dudes that were trying to tell us that Steph Curry, not LeBron James, is the best player in the world; we ain't having none of that **** cause that's our guy.
Like Pack said, we can manipulate **** pretty much how we want to fit our narrative. Was it MY intent by posting to spark debate? Absolutely not, but some took it that way and I can see why they would. Was it the graphic designer's intent? Possibly, but their intent is irrelevant to me because that was not MY intent.
Comment