February Games Discussion Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ojandpizza
    Hall Of Fame
    • Apr 2011
    • 29807

    #736
    Re: February Games Discussion Thread

    Originally posted by ggsimmonds
    I hate that part of it. Any way we slice it "bust" is not a positive, but if you're equating bust with = one of the worst draft picks in history that definitely explains your reaction to putting that label on Wiseman.



    Every draft has busts, some are bigger than others. Even in the worst case scenario I don't think Wiseman is anywhere near an all-time bust though. I don't think he'll be cracking any top 10 lists of the biggest busts or anything.



    I'm a Wizards fan. So drafting guys who fail to reach expectations or produce at the hoped for level is something I am something of an expert on. Maybe I'm so use to draft picks not delivering that I've become more liberal with my use of the word
    This is all fine and dandy in the context of this, what is now, a really in depth multi-page discussion. But in the general use of the word busts are Bowie, Brown, Bennett, etc. If you want to take a deeper dive and more narrowly define what constitutes a level 1 bust, level 2 bust, level 9 bust, and so on that’s fine, but most people’s initial reaction to the word “bust” isn’t going to include players who are actually good.

    If you want to take every number 3 pick in league history and average out what the general career looks like to compare against future number 3 picks be my guest, but we typically aren’t taking dives that deep to decide who is/isn’t a bust. And yes Washington has a ton of them lol. Sorry [emoji23].



    Originally posted by ggsimmonds
    To me 1 thru 4 doesn't matter. A bust is a player who fails to produce at the level expected out of his draft position and/or pre-draft hype.

    Why he failed to do so (injury, mental factors, etc) is another matter.

    I don’t agree with that without more context honestly. Some players have generational talent and expectations. Some players are simply drafted in the wrong spot. Outside the rare few none of these players have control over their hype, and most of them are not considered franchise altering players to begin with. Not every number 1 pick has LeBron, Zion, Victor expectations so not every number 1 pick, or whatever number, should have the same expectations year in and year out.

    Anthony Bennett. He’s a bust, played on 4 different teams and was out of the league in 4 years. But for the sake of this argument let’s say he had an average career. He was projected to be drafted like 13th. If he’s actually drafted 13th nobody ever cares to call him a bust. But because Cleveland is stupid he’s the bust? My point is not every draft pick represents what a players actual projected expectation is. Labeling a guy a bust puts that on the player, which is not fair when it’s the teams fault.

    Tyson Chandler might be a better real world example of that. He had a great career, won a ring, phenomenal defender. Nobody ever calls him a bust. He was drafted 2nd overall and traded for 20&10 Elton Brand expected to be the Bulls cornerstone (with Curry) for the next however many years. He was being compared to Kevin Garnett and Rasheed Wallace. By all this back and forth he’s 100% a massive bust, but we know in the real world nobody calls Tyson Chandler a bust.

    As for the rest, there is no real definition of what a bust is. Kinda like the word “superstar”. That’s why it will generally vary from person to person what they believe fits into that category. Like for me, I refuse to label guys like Oden or Jay Williams a bust. It was out of their control and they both showed flashes in the league of why they were picked where they were and justified where they were picked. So I do think those 1-4 matter. To me anyways. And I didn’t mean for those to be ranked in any sort of order, I was just saying those are the main 4 things we see the word bust most associate with.

    Comment

    • ggsimmonds
      Hall Of Fame
      • Jan 2009
      • 11235

      #737
      Re: February Games Discussion Thread

      Originally posted by ojandpizza
      This is all fine and dandy in the context of this, what is now, a really in depth multi-page discussion. But in the general use of the word busts are Bowie, Brown, Bennett, etc. If you want to take a deeper dive and more narrowly define what constitutes a level 1 bust, level 2 bust, level 9 bust, and so on that’s fine, but most people’s initial reaction to the word “bust” isn’t going to include players who are actually good.

      If you want to take every number 3 pick in league history and average out what the general career looks like to compare against future number 3 picks be my guest, but we typically aren’t taking dives that deep to decide who is/isn’t a bust. And yes Washington has a ton of them lol. Sorry [emoji23].
      Oh yeah, bust is a bad mark don't misunderstand me, I'm not saying "good" players are busts. My only point was that you don't need to be historically noteworthy to be a bust. Jan Vesely was undoubtedly a bust, though I doubt few outside of DC remember that name. Some guys get remembered more than others, whether fairly or unfairly.

      And I'm not saying we need to come up with a Bust advanced metric to compare different busts, but there are levels. If you are a number 1 pick taken over a future HOFer you're gonna get remembered. You'll definitely get remembered if you are a #1 pick taken over a future HOFer and you were picked by God disguised as Michael Jordan. But if you were picked 6th in a weak class and out of the league within 3 seasons, you may not be as remembered (unless you are remembered for a steamy kiss with your hot wife on draft night), but that doesn't mean you aren't a bust.



      Originally posted by ojandpizza
      I don’t agree with that without more context honestly. Some players have generational talent and expectations. Some players are simply drafted in the wrong spot. Outside the rare few none of these players have control over their hype, and most of them are not considered franchise altering players to begin with. Not every number 1 pick has LeBron, Zion, Victor expectations so not every number 1 pick, or whatever number, should have the same expectations year in and year out.

      Anthony Bennett. He’s a bust, played on 4 different teams and was out of the league in 4 years. But for the sake of this argument let’s say he had an average career. He was projected to be drafted like 13th. If he’s actually drafted 13th nobody ever cares to call him a bust. But because Cleveland is stupid he’s the bust? My point is not every draft pick represents what a players actual projected expectation is. Labeling a guy a bust puts that on the player, which is not fair when it’s the teams fault.

      Tyson Chandler might be a better real world example of that. He had a great career, won a ring, phenomenal defender. Nobody ever calls him a bust. He was drafted 2nd overall and traded for 20&10 Elton Brand expected to be the Bulls cornerstone (with Curry) for the next however many years. He was being compared to Kevin Garnett and Rasheed Wallace. By all this back and forth he’s 100% a massive bust, but we know in the real world nobody calls Tyson Chandler a bust.

      As for the rest, there is no real definition of what a bust is. Kinda like the word “superstar”. That’s why it will generally vary from person to person what they believe fits into that category. Like for me, I refuse to label guys like Oden or Jay Williams a bust. It was out of their control and they both showed flashes in the league of why they were picked where they were and justified where they were picked. So I do think those 1-4 matter. To me anyways. And I didn’t mean for those to be ranked in any sort of order, I was just saying those are the main 4 things we see the word bust most associate with.
      I alluded to this in my above response, but also in my quoted post where I said "and/or pre-draft hype." Not all #1s are equal. If Victor W only lasts a few years and never amounts to anything, thats definitely going to be historically noteworthy due to his hype. But there is still a floor. Tyson is not considered a bust because he had a long and productive career where he was a contributor. Did he reach his ceiling or best-case career trajectory (the KG comparison)? No, but he met or exceeded the floor expectation and thats why he is not a bust.

      Specifically for the bolded part regarding Oden And Jay Williams, I get where you are coming from but lets look at the other bolded part regarding Bennett. Because its also true for the Kwames, Veselys, and Bowies. No one controls who they are drafted by. Break it down line by line we get this:

      1. Greg Oden is not a bust because he cannot control injuries, and we should not hold things against players that they do not control.
      2. Players do not control where they are drafted.
      3. We cannot label a player a bust due to draft position.
      4. Ergo, no one is a bust.


      They matter in the sense that they are different flavors of busts.

      Virtually every list of the biggest busts over the past 40 years you can google is going to list Greg Oden as a bust. Oden belongs in the list of busts. But if you want to compare him to say Kwame Brown or any other bust, okay thats when we take a deep dive into what made those players busts and thats when 1-4 matters.

      Comment

      • DamnYanks2
        Hall Of Fame
        • Jun 2007
        • 20794

        #738
        Re: February Games Discussion Thread

        Damn. I just read all of this stuff that yall have been going back and forth on and it's fascinating to hear the different opinions on it. I never even thought that deep on it before.

        For me the guy is a bust if he just doesn't come close to the hype. Hardly anyone lives up to the hype. Because the bar is set too damn high to start. But to me busts are simple. Guys like Darko, Adam Morrison, Anthony Bennett, Thabeet Michael Kidd Gilchrist. Those guys are busts because they didnt even come close to the hype and never deserved that high draft pick to begin with. They were just overrated and it had nothing to do with the system they played in.

        Definitely wouldn't label Wiseman a bust yet. It's way too early. He's trending in that direction but I'm not ready to label that yet.



        Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

        Comment

        • J_Posse
          Greatness Personified
          • Jun 2005
          • 11255

          #739
          Re: February Games Discussion Thread

          Originally posted by jeebs9
          https://youtu.be/20KxcYnglO0

          Put some respect on his name!
          Thanks for sending out the link, Jeebs. I always appreciate a YouTube channel that tries to breakdown and analyze players.

          Official HQ of Bills Backer/Spurs Nation
          San Antonio Spurs 5 - Time ('99, '03, '05, '07, '14) NBA Champions

          Official OS Bills Backers Club Member

          Comment

          • J_Posse
            Greatness Personified
            • Jun 2005
            • 11255

            #740
            Re: February Games Discussion Thread

            Originally posted by jeebs9
            Golden State is gonna regret drafting, not utilizing, and then trading Wiseman for nothing.

            I understand the injuries have hurt his progression, plus his lack of feel on both ends, but the kid's upside is still apparent.

            I'll repeat that if the Spurs miss out on Wembanyama, then they should attempt to acquire him somehow.

            I think some of the blame needs to fall on Kerr and his coaching staff. They've had three "highly touted" picks (Wiseman, Kuminga, and Moody) fall in their lap, yet so far none of them has become a meaningful contributor.

            I'd be shocked if any remain in Golden State beyond their initial contract.

            Note: They have done an excellent job in developing and incorporating Looney and Poole, though.

            Official HQ of Bills Backer/Spurs Nation
            Last edited by J_Posse; 02-18-2023, 01:53 PM.
            San Antonio Spurs 5 - Time ('99, '03, '05, '07, '14) NBA Champions

            Official OS Bills Backers Club Member

            Comment

            • dubcity
              Hall Of Fame
              • May 2012
              • 17873

              #741
              Re: February Games Discussion Thread

              Originally posted by J_Posse

              I think some of the blame needs to fall on Kerr and his coaching staff. They've had three "highly touted" picks (Wiseman, Kuminga, and Moody) fall in their lap, yet so far none of them has become a meaningful contributor.

              I'd be shocked if any remain in Golden State beyond their initial contract.

              Note: They have done an excellent job in developing and incorporating Looney and Poole, though.

              Official HQ of Bills Backer/Spurs Nation
              In theory I don't see where the problem would be with the coaching. 3 top prospects going to a team with the archetype of winning modern basketball philosophy, with all the rings to show for it, and those players should be benefitting from this being their landing spot. As opposed to ending up in Houston or wherever, and averaging 16 ppg on a bad team.

              Wiseman getting traded for nothing has as much to do with no one in the league wanting him as it does the Warriors getting nothing for him.
              Last edited by dubcity; 02-18-2023, 03:32 PM.

              Comment

              • J_Posse
                Greatness Personified
                • Jun 2005
                • 11255

                #742
                Re: February Games Discussion Thread

                Originally posted by dubcity
                In theory I don't see where the problem would be with the coaching. 3 top prospects going to a team with the archetype of winning modern basketball philosophy, with all the rings to show for it, and those players should be benefitting from this being their landing spot. As opposed to ending up in Houston or wherever, and averaging 16 ppg on a bad team.

                Wiseman getting traded for nothing has as much to do with no one in the league wanting him as it does the Warriors getting nothing for him.
                The problem isn't the coaching (schematically), but his inability (IMO) to heavily incorporate any of the three as their core guys are aging out.

                Again, I give him credit for doing a damn good job with "lesser" prospects. Still, those three were supposed to extend the Warrior's championship window.

                Well, whether it's for financial reasons or lack of development (being a "bust") I see none of them being there long-term.

                The market has shrunk for centers considerably unless you are dumb *** Minnesota. The Kings sold off "bust" Marvin Bagley for nothing, the Spurs traded Poeltl for less than they initially wanted, etc, etc.

                Official HQ of Bills Backer/Spurs Nation
                Last edited by J_Posse; 02-18-2023, 06:38 PM.
                San Antonio Spurs 5 - Time ('99, '03, '05, '07, '14) NBA Champions

                Official OS Bills Backers Club Member

                Comment

                • bigeastbumrush
                  My Momma's Son
                  • Feb 2003
                  • 19245

                  #743
                  Re: February Games Discussion Thread

                  Other pro sports leagues: All-Star Weekend is to showcase the best of your talent to people who wouldn’t normally view.

                  Adam Silver: Say less

                  Comment

                  • DamnYanks2
                    Hall Of Fame
                    • Jun 2007
                    • 20794

                    #744
                    Re: February Games Discussion Thread

                    Originally posted by bigeastbumrush
                    Other pro sports leagues: All-Star Weekend is to showcase the best of your talent to people who wouldn’t normally view.

                    Adam Silver: Say less

                    Yea this is boring as hell.

                    Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

                    Comment

                    • DamnYanks2
                      Hall Of Fame
                      • Jun 2007
                      • 20794

                      #745
                      Re: February Games Discussion Thread

                      Julius Randle in the 3 pt contest and it went how I expected.[emoji38] He did better then Huerter's 8 though[emoji1]

                      Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

                      Comment

                      • ojandpizza
                        Hall Of Fame
                        • Apr 2011
                        • 29807

                        #746
                        Re: February Games Discussion Thread

                        Minor complaint but the scoring format is dumb.

                        Comment

                        • DamnYanks2
                          Hall Of Fame
                          • Jun 2007
                          • 20794

                          #747
                          Re: February Games Discussion Thread

                          Dame takes it. Now on to the nba dunk contest with a bunch of guys nobody ever heard of. I like Mac in this one.

                          Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

                          Comment

                          • ojandpizza
                            Hall Of Fame
                            • Apr 2011
                            • 29807

                            #748
                            Re: February Games Discussion Thread

                            They really can’t even get the camera on the right guy [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]

                            Comment

                            • ojandpizza
                              Hall Of Fame
                              • Apr 2011
                              • 29807

                              #749
                              Re: February Games Discussion Thread

                              Mac will get both the undersized and white man can’t jump brownie points.. but KJ can fly. I would think he should take this.

                              It’s a shame Sharpe pulled out. He’s next tier.

                              Comment

                              • VDusen04
                                Hall Of Fame
                                • Aug 2003
                                • 13026

                                #750
                                Re: February Games Discussion Thread

                                Man, I didn't even recognize Harold Miner. Can't believe it's been 30 years.

                                <iframe src="https://giphy.com/embed/l46CljLdXQgyI9BxS" width="480" height="268" frameBorder="0" class="giphy-embed" allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="https://giphy.com/gifs/l46CljLdXQgyI9BxS"></a></p>

                                Comment

                                Working...