Re: UFC 4: Needs vs. Wants
Need: Back mount/flattened should be harder to get out of.
Want: Ground stuns.
Need: Back mount/flattened should be harder to get out of.
Want: Ground stuns.
-
-
Re: UFC 4: Needs vs. Wants
Need: More points for low-mid tier fighters so there’d be incentive to have a variety of picks. You should lose minimal points for loses with low-mid tier but gain a lot with victories due to risk. The opposite for top tier fights, gain little points but safer and lose a lot of points with losses. Then we’d see the whole roster being used rather than facing the same fighters over and over.Comment
-
Re: UFC 4: Needs vs. Wants
Need- Some info
Want- Some infoComment
-
Re: UFC 4: Needs vs. Wants
Crucifix shouldn't be so easy to get into ... Same for top mount . Top mount shouldn't be easy to escape either .
This is where mini transitions come in.
Sent from my Infinix X604 using Operation Sports mobile appComment
-
Re: UFC 4: Needs vs. Wants
Agreed. Striking damage makes it so that its harder to grapplers to score unless they use power TDs and get into the final sub gates. As such, these grappling positions should reflect reality not be adjusted for the meta.
What do you mean by mini transitions? Sounds interesting.Comment
-
Re: UFC 4: Needs vs. Wants
Need: Stuns from sub guard and back against the cage.
Comment
-
Re: UFC 4: Needs vs. Wants
Upkick and diving strike stuns
Comment
-
Re: UFC 4: Needs vs. Wants
Apparently kinetic was kicked off the GCs program . I wonder what he was advocating for or fighting against ? I know he can't say but I'd like some insight into this .
Sent from my Infinix X604 using Operation Sports mobile appComment
-
Re: UFC 4: Needs vs. Wants
We can't exactly be sure . Kinetic's criticism of this game encompassed a couple of issues.
We can all guess but we really don't know. But whatever it was ... Could well be in there at launch. It's quite possible that the GCs have had some info about this game. I doubt if they will be flying to EA Vancouver any time soon with this pandemic and all.
Sent from my Infinix X604 using Operation Sports mobile appComment
-
Re: UFC 4: Needs vs. Wants
Needs:
The game
Wants:
Live rosters with regular updates to stats
Improved grapple system
Simulation and arcade modes
More strikes and leg kicks per fighterComment
-
Re: UFC 4: Needs vs. Wants
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Sh4H_xCCvW8" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Need: revamped subs. The first thing mentioned in this video is revamping subs.
Want: sustained leans/crouching (mobile 360 headmovement).
Need: Pre-deny animation/transition block like UD3Comment
-
Re: UFC 4: Needs vs. Wants
Even more of the roster and more frequently added fighters/updated rankings.St. Louis Cardinals | Milwaukee Bucks | Los Angeles Rams
UWW | UWGB | Duke
AEW
Comment
-
Re: UFC 4: Needs vs. Wants
I just had a draw on FNC and it reminded me of this thread. It was cool to see both fighters hands raised in the end, especially since I genuinely didn't know which way it was going to go.
I've never seen one in UFC. It's not a "need", but I think it would be a very cool addition.
Enviado desde mi Pixel 3a XL mediante TapatalkLast edited by Pappy Knuckles; 04-22-2020, 08:03 PM.Comment
-
Re: UFC 4: Needs vs. Wants
Its a need bro. Split dec,majority dec,draw. I like that whole ****.I just had a draw on FNC and it reminded me of this thread. It was cool to see both fighters hands raised in the end, epecially since I genuinely didn't know which way it was going to go.
I've never seen a split decision in UFC. It's not a "need", but I think it would be a very cool addition.
Enviado desde mi Pixel 3a XL mediante TapatalkComment
Comment