UFC 143- Condit v. Diaz - Februrary 4

[st67]

Re: UFC 143- Condit v. Diaz - Februrary 4

Condit won rounds 1 and 2.

[The Chef]

Re: UFC 143- Condit v. Diaz - Februrary 4

I think Nick definitely got more beat up, but points wise IDK I just saw Diaz in the first three and Condit the last two

I only see Diaz winning round 5 thanks to the end of it but at the same time Condit didnt exactly do anything big either.

[nyj721]

Re: UFC 143- Condit v. Diaz - Februrary 4

That fight sucked. This whole card has sucked. I don't even know who won that because of how uneventful it was. It doesn't even really matter because the winner doesn't stand a chance vs. GSP.

[Fiasco West]

Re: UFC 143- Condit v. Diaz - Februrary 4

Yep. Diaz seemed the more passive of the two IMO not surprised by the decision.

[st67]

Re: UFC 143- Condit v. Diaz - Februrary 4

I only see Diaz winning round 5 thanks to the end of it but at the same time Condit didnt exactly do anything big either.

This. Diaz didn't do much either - he walked forward; threw some combos against the fence that didn't land many times, then talked and threw his hands around trying to get in Condit's head. Condit was backing up, but doing a lot more.

[The Chef]

Re: UFC 143- Condit v. Diaz - Februrary 4

That fight sucked. This whole card has sucked. I don't even know who won that because of how uneventful it was. It doesn't even really matter because the winner doesn't stand a chance vs. GSP.

Strongly disagree, strongly. If Jake Shields with his average at best stand up could do as much damage to GSP's face as he did then I don't see why Condit or Diaz couldn't have done the same thing.

[Tha_Kid]

Re: UFC 143- Condit v. Diaz - Februrary 4

lol @ "i hope you guys were entertained"

Nothing wrong with running away and picking angles if thats your gameplan and it gets you the W, but don't say that lol

[ex carrabba fan]

Re: UFC 143- Condit v. Diaz - Februrary 4

I knew Nick was going to retire lol

[Fiasco West]

Re: UFC 143- Condit v. Diaz - Februrary 4

What...he's retiring?

Dude come on...just because you pushed him back doesn't mean he ran...he was not the more aggressive fighter just because he moved forward.

[nyj721]

Re: UFC 143- Condit v. Diaz - Februrary 4

Strongly disagree, strongly. If Jake Shields with his average at best stand up could do as much damage to GSP's face as he did then I don't see why Condit or Diaz couldn't have done the same thing.

I think the only reason Shields did damage was because GSP was avoiding the ground at all costs. He won't have that same respect for Condit's jiu jitsu, so I think it will be a classic GSP ground and pound win.

[jeremym480]

Re: UFC 143- Condit v. Diaz - Februrary 4

Little Nicky is going to take his ball and go home? What a punk.

[ex carrabba fan]

Re: UFC 143- Condit v. Diaz - Februrary 4

Yeah Jeremy that's pretty much what it is. It was predictable.

I now hope that Diego loses to Ellenberger so we can get Diaz/Diego II

Ellenberger v Condit, winner gets GSP

Then have Diaz still waiting in the wings

[Dog]

Re: UFC 143- Condit v. Diaz - Februrary 4

Diaz is a little bitch

[The Chef]

Re: UFC 143- Condit v. Diaz - Februrary 4

I knew Nick was going to retire lol

Rather pathetic display by Diaz after the fight but I guess I should expect no less. He knew he was down and thats why he suddenly started throwing kicks and trying to take him down in the 5th round, the idea that had he known he was down on the cards he would have finished the fight is ridiculous as you always try and finish a fight. Good riddance to him, if he thinks guys should literally stand up against the cage and let him pot shot them to death then hes nuts.

[p_rushing]

Re: UFC 143- Condit v. Diaz - Februrary 4

Maybe Diaz should have done something about Condit punching him and then getting out of the way. Maybe he should have been the one striking first. Condit is one of the first guys in the UFC to stick to the gameplan and not do what Diaz wanted.