Brand Split 2.0

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IndianBird
    MVP
    • Nov 2004
    • 2909

    #121
    Re: Brand Split 2.0

    Nice job. I like it. Those drafts over the final years of he first split were pretty lackluster.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    #WolvesUp
    I'm a Vince McMahon Guy!

    On, On, On, To Victory!!

    Gamertag: stewgilligan

    Comment

    • dubcity
      Hall Of Fame
      • May 2012
      • 17874

      #122
      Re: Brand Split 2.0

      The stylistic differences between the shows will be minimal, because WWE's own "rules" limit what they do. Bring back Shotgun Saturday night, with a TV-MA rating lol.

      Comment

      • IndianBird
        MVP
        • Nov 2004
        • 2909

        #123
        Re: Brand Split 2.0

        Originally posted by dubcity
        The stylistic differences between the shows will be minimal, because WWE's own "rules" limit what they do. Bring back Shotgun Saturday night, with a TV-MA rating lol.


        And Terri's 1998 boobs.




        Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

        #WolvesUp
        I'm a Vince McMahon Guy!

        On, On, On, To Victory!!

        Gamertag: stewgilligan

        Comment

        • Mercury112491
          All Star
          • Mar 2007
          • 7426

          #124
          Re: Brand Split 2.0

          I got tickets to Smackdown next week. So I'll do what I can to keep you guys up to date


          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

          Comment

          • Majingir
            Moderator
            • Apr 2005
            • 47585

            #125
            Re: Brand Split 2.0

            Decided to try out WWEs fantasy draft thing


            I wonder if the WWE.com fantasy draft is an indication of who might be drafted, when. The order they got set up begins with Cena,AJ,Rollins,Ambrose,Reigns. Taker,Lesnar,Eva,Rosa are draft eligible, but some like Rock,HHH,Kidd aren't.

            Comment

            • SPTO
              binging
              • Feb 2003
              • 68046

              #126
              Re: Brand Split 2.0

              Originally posted by dubcity
              The stylistic differences between the shows will be minimal, because WWE's own "rules" limit what they do. Bring back Shotgun Saturday night, with a TV-MA rating lol.
              Eh? Rules? Who the hell follows self imposed rules.

              In other words: explain please?
              Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club

              "Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. Parker

              Comment

              • WWF80sKid
                All Star
                • Nov 2008
                • 7095

                #127
                Re: Brand Split 2.0

                I'm pretty excited for this.

                MICHIGAN WOLVERINES
                1901 | 1902 | 1903 | 1904 | 1918 | 1923 | 1932 | 1933 | 1947 | 1948 | 1997 | 2023

                MONTREAL CANADIENS
                1916 | 1924 | 1930 | 1931 | 1944 | 1946 | 1953 | 1956 | 1957 | 1958 | 1959 | 1960 | 1965
                1966 | 1968 | 1971 | 1973 | 1976 | 1977 | 1978 | 1979 | 1986 | 1993

                Comment

                • Jm0ney2001
                  MVP
                  • Nov 2003
                  • 1352

                  #128
                  Re: Brand Split 2.0

                  It would be nice if smackdown got away from the pg rating. Or raw did. I think they will do it a lot better than last time. Definitely will not have anyone appearing on both shows I don't think.

                  Comment

                  • IndianBird
                    MVP
                    • Nov 2004
                    • 2909

                    #129
                    Re: Brand Split 2.0

                    Originally posted by Jm0ney2001
                    It would be nice if smackdown got away from the pg rating. Or raw did. I think they will do it a lot better than last time. Definitely will not have anyone appearing on both shows I don't think.


                    I think PG is just fine.


                    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                    #WolvesUp
                    I'm a Vince McMahon Guy!

                    On, On, On, To Victory!!

                    Gamertag: stewgilligan

                    Comment

                    • Majingir
                      Moderator
                      • Apr 2005
                      • 47585

                      #130
                      Re: Brand Split 2.0

                      Really do hope set wise,things change. Raw,SD,PPV literally use same set,just diff graphics/lighting. Doesn't make anything look different. At times felt like one big show divided up into 3 days.

                      Raw needs the red ropes and black ringposts, SD the blue ropes and white ringposts, and ppvs should be black ropes or something. Small thing, but little things like that help distinguish brands alot.

                      Hopefully each show does feel like a diff brand. Past few years, SD was just "Raw recap", Dudleys at one point literally word for word had same in ring promo on both shows. In dying days of old extension, SD was basically "Raw jr/B show", featuring big show,sheamus,del Rio main events.

                      Comment

                      • King_B_Mack
                        All Star
                        • Jan 2009
                        • 24450

                        #131
                        Re: Brand Split 2.0

                        Originally posted by Majingir
                        Really do hope set wise,things change. Raw,SD,PPV literally use same set,just diff graphics/lighting. Doesn't make anything look different. At times felt like one big show divided up into 3 days.

                        Raw needs the red ropes and black ringposts, SD the blue ropes and white ringposts, and ppvs should be black ropes or something. Small thing, but little things like that help distinguish brands alot.

                        Hopefully each show does feel like a diff brand. Past few years, SD was just "Raw recap", Dudleys at one point literally word for word had same in ring promo on both shows. In dying days of old extension, SD was basically "Raw jr/B show", featuring big show,sheamus,del Rio main events.
                        Really was a far cry from the Smackdown Six days. Here's hoping we get a new era like that and Smackdown isn't simply used as a pillaging ground for Raw again.

                        Comment

                        • reyes the roof
                          Hall Of Fame
                          • Mar 2009
                          • 11526

                          #132
                          Re: Brand Split 2.0

                          Is this the first time Smackdown has been live? As long as it's live I don't think it will be treated like the B show

                          Comment

                          • dubcity
                            Hall Of Fame
                            • May 2012
                            • 17874

                            #133
                            Re: Brand Split 2.0

                            Originally posted by IndianBird
                            I think PG is just fine.


                            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                            #WolvesUp
                            PG can be fine, but a formulaic, sanitized product is not. We at least need the illusion of spontaneity every once in a while. Little things like the "guy gets thrown out of the ring cue for commercial" spots need to go.

                            Comment

                            • Cubfan
                              World Series Champions!!
                              • Feb 2004
                              • 3929

                              #134
                              Re: Brand Split 2.0

                              I just hope that if the ratings start going down on one show we don't suddenly start seeing people from the other brand just to boost the rating. I'm dead against having a commissioner and a GM on each show. That's more lines that get written when their is to much talking in the first place.
                              MLB: Chicago Cubs
                              NFL: San Diego Chargers
                              NHL: Chicago Blackhawks
                              NBA: Chicago Bulls
                              NCAA: Iowa Hawkeyes

                              Comment

                              • dubcity
                                Hall Of Fame
                                • May 2012
                                • 17874

                                #135
                                Re: Brand Split 2.0

                                Originally posted by Cubfan
                                I just hope that if the ratings start going down on one show we don't suddenly start seeing people from the other brand just to boost the rating. I'm dead against having a commissioner and a GM on each show. That's more lines that get written when their is to much talking in the first place.
                                Well, if Raw ratings go down, all bets are off. They'll hit the panic button and all this competitive rhetoric will go out the window.

                                Comment

                                Working...