Michael Vick Discussion Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Buckeyes_Doc
    In Dalton I Trust
    • Jan 2009
    • 11918

    #346
    Re: Michael Vick Discussion Thread

    Originally posted by sb24
    You dont see the difference between what he said and what you were doing with your "sources"? Well that explains your thread in the madden forum.
    Thats the point becuase there is no difference..its all speculation. People are just reporting because its a hot topic and they want to keep adding teams who are interested to attract viewers. Just my opinion.
    Ohio State - Reds - Bengals - Blackhawks - Bulls

    Comment

    • shnuskis
      MVP
      • Aug 2008
      • 1172

      #347
      Re: Michael Vick Discussion Thread

      Originally posted by ANDROMADA 1
      What do you guys think of Vick to Seattle...That is the latest rumor according to"The Michael Irvin Show".
      I like the Vick to Seatle rumor. I can see that working as far a coach-player relationship again. Although I am not up on how the city/fan base would react.
      When rookie Randall Cobb was told by this U.S. Marine that he was a big fan of the wide receiver, Cobb said, “I think I’m a bigger fan of yours.”

      Comment

      • sb24
        MVP
        • Dec 2008
        • 3165

        #348
        Re: Michael Vick Discussion Thread

        Originally posted by lilbently
        Thats the point becuase there is no difference..its all speculation. People are just reporting because its a hot topic and they want to keep adding teams who are interested to attract viewers. Just my opinion.
        LMAO WOW.

        Comment

        • wwharton
          *ll St*r
          • Aug 2002
          • 26949

          #349
          Re: Michael Vick Discussion Thread

          Originally posted by sb24
          LMAO WOW.
          Yeah, I'm pretty sure there's a big difference between lying (even if you want to try to come back and call it a joke) and speculating.

          Comment

          • Buckeyes_Doc
            In Dalton I Trust
            • Jan 2009
            • 11918

            #350
            Re: Michael Vick Discussion Thread

            Keep hating guys..yesterday it was the vikings today its the seahawks whats tomorrow going to be...my source tells me..ahh forget it.
            Ohio State - Reds - Bengals - Blackhawks - Bulls

            Comment

            • Buckeyes_Doc
              In Dalton I Trust
              • Jan 2009
              • 11918

              #351
              Re: Michael Vick Discussion Thread

              Originally posted by wwharton
              Yeah, I'm pretty sure there's a big difference between lying (even if you want to try to come back and call it a joke) and speculating.
              what did I lie about? Wasnt the "source" I was using the same thing every sports network is reporting? So are they lying too?
              Ohio State - Reds - Bengals - Blackhawks - Bulls

              Comment

              • kehlis
                Moderator
                • Jul 2008
                • 27738

                #352
                Re: Michael Vick Discussion Thread

                Originally posted by lilbently
                what did I lie about? Wasnt the "source" I was using the same thing every sports network is reporting? So are they lying too?
                A "source" is someone who has knowledge on a certain situation.

                By claiming you had a source, which you later admitted was a "joke", you were lying. Pretty simple really.

                Comment

                • mKoz26
                  In case you forgot...
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 4685

                  #353
                  Re: Michael Vick Discussion Thread

                  Didn't you just say your source was an intern at ESPN? I'd call that a straight up lie. It obviously wasn't a joke, it was a lame attempt at trying to sound like some sort of insider.
                  Bears | Bulls | Cubs | Illinois | #Team3Some

                  @CDonkey26

                  Originally posted by baumy300
                  Yeah, she may be a bit of a beotch, but you get back to me when you find out a way to motorboat personality...

                  Comment

                  • Buckeyes_Doc
                    In Dalton I Trust
                    • Jan 2009
                    • 11918

                    #354
                    Re: Michael Vick Discussion Thread

                    Originally posted by kehlis
                    A "source" is someone who has knowledge on a certain situation.

                    By claiming you had a source, which you later admitted was a "joke", you were lying. Pretty simple really.
                    Geeze..my source was BSPN. Its not like I was hear saying omg vick is going to sign with the bengals,because thats not true. When did I lie here? I said vick was interested in the patriots and vick was interested in the vikings=what has been reported on espn.
                    Ohio State - Reds - Bengals - Blackhawks - Bulls

                    Comment

                    • Buckeyes_Doc
                      In Dalton I Trust
                      • Jan 2009
                      • 11918

                      #355
                      Re: Michael Vick Discussion Thread

                      Ok I lied!! holy smokes I never thought saying I had a source had so much of an uproar...I just hope Vick gets signed soon this is getting worse then farve.
                      Ohio State - Reds - Bengals - Blackhawks - Bulls

                      Comment

                      • bkrich83
                        Has Been
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 71577

                        #356
                        Re: Michael Vick Discussion Thread

                        We really need a minimum age requirement.
                        Tracking my NCAA Coach Career

                        Comment

                        • Buckeyes_Doc
                          In Dalton I Trust
                          • Jan 2009
                          • 11918

                          #357
                          Re: Michael Vick Discussion Thread

                          Originally posted by bkrich83
                          We really need a minimum age requirement.
                          couldnt agree more.
                          Ohio State - Reds - Bengals - Blackhawks - Bulls

                          Comment

                          • Cebby
                            Banned
                            • Apr 2005
                            • 22327

                            #358
                            Re: Michael Vick Discussion Thread

                            Originally posted by bkrich83
                            We really need a minimum age requirement.
                            Why?

                            When I was under 18, there was no way in hell I was clicking "I disagree, exit here" when looking at pornography. Do you really think 12 year olds are going to say they aren't 13/15/20?

                            Comment

                            • Primerica
                              Rookie
                              • Nov 2007
                              • 470

                              #359
                              Re: Michael Vick Discussion Thread

                              Originally posted by Cebby
                              Why?

                              When I was under 18, there was no way in hell I was clicking "I disagree, exit here" when looking at pornography. Do you really think 12 year olds are going to say they aren't 13/15/20?
                              Really, I agree.

                              Comment

                              • deaduck
                                MVP
                                • Mar 2009
                                • 2389

                                #360
                                Re: Michael Vick Discussion Thread

                                Maybe instead of a age gimmick....OS could have a quiz that you had to pass everytime you logged on. Like a gameshow where you won the right to post stuff.

                                Naw...that'd never work.

                                Comment

                                Working...