NFL Off Topic

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SPTO
    binging
    • Feb 2003
    • 68046

    #29806
    Re: NFL Off Topic

    Originally posted by Majingir
    He sent out a tweet ending in:
    "I look forward to exploring new options within the United States."

    I'm sure he did contact the AAF about joining them. Wouldn't be surprised to see a team go after him.
    Apparently someone from the Birmingham Iron tweeted interest in him. It could be just a fake tweet but that's what I saw.
    Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club

    "Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. Parker

    Comment

    • p_rushing
      Hall Of Fame
      • Feb 2004
      • 14514

      #29807
      Re: NFL Off Topic

      Originally posted by SPTO
      IIRC his deal was an iron clad 2 year deal that meant no contact with any other leagues etc etc. So it was a violation of his actual contract which means they can terminate without pay.
      Originally posted by Majingir
      He sent out a tweet ending in:
      "I look forward to exploring new options within the United States."

      I'm sure he did contact the AAF about joining them. Wouldn't be surprised to see a team go after him.
      I just find it strange that the punishment for reaching out to another league is them releasing him, enabling him to then go to the other league. That isn't a smart business decision. Why "fire" someone when you can get them to buyout their contract?

      It's like if an employee who is under contract comes to their boss and says I have a better offer from another company. You don't fire the employee who has a contract, you make them break the contract per the terms and get X money back.

      Comment

      • ProfessaPackMan
        Bamma
        • Mar 2008
        • 63852

        #29808
        Re: NFL Off Topic

        Possible Rule Change Alert:

        The Chiefs lost the AFC Championship Game without their offense ever taking the field in overtime, and they don’t want that to happen again — to them or any other team.

        And so, Chiefs General Manager Brett Veach said on PFT Live, Chiefs coach Andy Reid is working on a proposal to change the overtime rules and guarantee that each team would get an offensive possession.

        “Coach is working on that,” Veach said. “I think everybody wants a chance for guys to do what they do. I don’t really see the downside of having that. Especially when you have a player like Pat Mahomes. It would have been a lot of fun. I think people, if they weren’t already tuned in for a great game, would have turned on that overtime.”

        Overtime rules are often the subject of offseason discussion, but this year, after both conference championship games went to overtime, is likely to see even more of that discussion than usual. The Chiefs will have to convince 23 other teams to support them for any rule to change.
        #RespectTheCulture

        Comment

        • ricky24
          MVP
          • Jan 2014
          • 4888

          #29809
          Re: NFL Off Topic

          Chiefs pushing for it huh? Who would have thought?

          Comment

          • The Kid 24
            It's Show Time!
            • Jan 2007
            • 14762

            #29810
            Re: NFL Off Topic

            Originally posted by ProfessaPackMan
            Possible Rule Change Alert:
            Good! The overtime rule of TD, game is over is so ****ing stupid.
            Milwaukee Brewers | Green Bay Packers | North Carolina Tar Heels | Wisconsin Badgers

            Comment

            • SPTO
              binging
              • Feb 2003
              • 68046

              #29811
              Re: NFL Off Topic

              Originally posted by The Kid 24
              Good! The overtime rule of TD, game is over is so ****ing stupid.
              Could be worse, FG, game is over.

              Oh wait....
              Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club

              "Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. Parker

              Comment

              • areobee401
                Hall Of Fame
                • Apr 2006
                • 16771

                #29812
                NFL Off Topic

                I am fine with the current rules and will be fine with the change mentioned above.

                It’s when we start eliminating ties where I draw the line. Watching folks lose their minds anytime a tie occurs is a pleasure of mine.
                http://twitter.com/smittyroberts

                Comment

                • p_rushing
                  Hall Of Fame
                  • Feb 2004
                  • 14514

                  #29813
                  Re: NFL Off Topic

                  Why would it matter if the Chiefs got the ball? The Pats would have won it the next time they go the ball.

                  Sent from my SM-T820 using Tapatalk

                  Comment

                  • kehlis
                    Moderator
                    • Jul 2008
                    • 27738

                    #29814
                    Re: NFL Off Topic

                    Originally posted by SPTO
                    Could be worse, FG, game is over.

                    Oh wait....
                    Are you suggesting you don't want an OT game to ever end on a FG or am I misunderstanding what you mean by the "oh wait"?

                    Comment

                    • slickdtc
                      Grayscale
                      • Aug 2004
                      • 17125

                      #29815
                      Re: NFL Off Topic

                      The least cool thing in sports is the loser point in hockey. Loser... point. Let that sink in. You are rewarded for LOSING in OT/shootout. That’s how I feel about this. It’s a BS consolation possession, falsely affecting the outcome of the game.

                      Fixing the way possession is determined in OT is the fairest solution, not giving more and more possessions out. A coin flip to determine a sporting contest is weird, totally agree. Very old school. Make it simple — home team gets ball first (unless they pull a Marty Morn). Home field advantage, for real. If you know you might not get a possession in OT as the visiting team, you gotta make sure it doesn’t get to that point. You get an even 8 home/away and in the playoffs, you’re seeded. Oh no... I’ll gladly give up division winners being seeded higher if we don’t mess with possession in OT.
                      NHL - Philadelphia Flyers
                      NFL - Buffalo Bills
                      MLB - Cincinnati Reds


                      Originally posted by Money99
                      And how does one levy a check that will result in only a slight concussion? Do they set their shoulder-pads to 'stun'?

                      Comment

                      • SPTO
                        binging
                        • Feb 2003
                        • 68046

                        #29816
                        Re: NFL Off Topic

                        Originally posted by kehlis
                        Are you suggesting you don't want an OT game to ever end on a FG or am I misunderstanding what you mean by the "oh wait"?
                        Nah, just saying it could be worse than what we have right now. I remember how people lost their minds over a team getting into FG position and just kicking it for the win on the first possession.
                        Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club

                        "Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. Parker

                        Comment

                        • p_rushing
                          Hall Of Fame
                          • Feb 2004
                          • 14514

                          #29817
                          Re: NFL Off Topic

                          Originally posted by slickdtc
                          The least cool thing in sports is the loser point in hockey. Loser... point. Let that sink in. You are rewarded for LOSING in OT/shootout. That’s how I feel about this. It’s a BS consolation possession, falsely affecting the outcome of the game.

                          Fixing the way possession is determined in OT is the fairest solution, not giving more and more possessions out. A coin flip to determine a sporting contest is weird, totally agree. Very old school. Make it simple — home team gets ball first (unless they pull a Marty Morn). Home field advantage, for real. If you know you might not get a possession in OT as the visiting team, you gotta make sure it doesn’t get to that point. You get an even 8 home/away and in the playoffs, you’re seeded. Oh no... I’ll gladly give up division winners being seeded higher if we don’t mess with possession in OT.
                          That would be fairer than the current coin flip.


                          If they change it, they need to change it where each team gets the ball and continues until it is no longer tied. No extra points allowed, so more games don't end up running out of time tied.

                          I also wouldn't mind no punts allowed, but that would take the tie games out.

                          Sent from my SM-T820 using Tapatalk

                          Comment

                          • mestevo
                            Gooney Goo Goo
                            • Apr 2010
                            • 19556

                            #29818
                            Re: NFL Off Topic

                            Originally posted by p_rushing
                            Why would it matter if the Chiefs got the ball? The Pats would have won it the next time they go the ball.

                            Sent from my SM-T820 using Tapatalk
                            ...and if that happened there probably wouldn't be any serious consideration to rule changes. That's kind of the point.

                            Comment

                            • TripleCrown9
                              Keep the Faith
                              • May 2010
                              • 23663

                              #29819
                              Re: NFL Off Topic

                              The answer is college OT rules, but everyone seems to think that's blasphemy.
                              Boston Red Sox
                              1903 1912 1915 1916 1918 2004 2007 2013 2018
                              9 4 1 8 27 6 14 45 26 34

                              Comment

                              • SPTO
                                binging
                                • Feb 2003
                                • 68046

                                #29820
                                Re: NFL Off Topic

                                Originally posted by TripleCrown9
                                The answer is college OT rules, but everyone seems to think that's blasphemy.
                                I had suggested that but putting the ball at the 40.
                                Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club

                                "Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. Parker

                                Comment

                                Working...