NFL Off Topic

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • slickdtc
    Grayscale
    • Aug 2004
    • 17125

    #30661
    Re: NFL Off Topic

    I think Mike Peirira (the rules analyst on the broadcast) hit it on the head last night when the late non-PI was challenged and upheld: they’re not saying there wasn’t PI, they’re saying it wasn’t egregious enough. He said the Saints/Rams non-call is pretty much the standard and if it’s not a complete mugging, it won’t get overturned.

    That’s umm, a strange way to implement this but also I think they know when we review things and slow them down there’s almost always a call to be made if the threshold is low. There’s always some contact, a hand around the waist, etc.

    It’s time for coaches/teams to adjust. Only phantoms PI calls will get reversed when the call is there was PI, and only absolutely completely missed calls will get the penalty when there wasn’t one originally.
    NHL - Philadelphia Flyers
    NFL - Buffalo Bills
    MLB - Cincinnati Reds


    Originally posted by Money99
    And how does one levy a check that will result in only a slight concussion? Do they set their shoulder-pads to 'stun'?

    Comment

    • Cardot
      I'm not on InstantFace.
      • Feb 2003
      • 6164

      #30662
      Re: NFL Off Topic

      One of my "officiating" pet peeves is whenever there is a close play at the goal line....where it looks like a ball carrier either crossed the goal line by a couple inches or was down a few inches short. If they deem he was short, they spot the ball way back at the one yard line. No one complains all that much, but at that part of the field, seems to me that there is a significant difference between 6 inches and 36 inches.

      Comment

      • Blzer
        Resident film pundit
        • Mar 2004
        • 42509

        #30663
        NFL Off Topic

        Originally posted by Cardot
        One of my "officiating" pet peeves is whenever there is a close play at the goal line....where it looks like a ball carrier either crossed the goal line by a couple inches or was down a few inches short. If they deem he was short, they spot the ball way back at the one yard line. No one complains all that much, but at that part of the field, seems to me that there is a significant difference between 6 inches and 36 inches.


        I thought about this at that exact moment last night, as I do every time this happens. I brought it up once and can’t remember if anyone attempted to clarify why they do this. It doesn’t make any sense. He was inches away.

        I also would like to know when the clock is supposed to stop after a field goal kick is attempted. Is it when the ball hits the ground? Because at the end of a quarter/half, they always seem to let the last few seconds run down after it goes through the uprights.
        Samsung PN60F8500 PDP / Anthem MRX 720 / Klipsch RC-62 II / Klipsch RF-82 II (x2) / Insignia NS-B2111 (x2) / SVS PC13-Ultra / SVS SB-2000 / Sony MDR-7506 Professional / Audio-Technica ATH-R70x / Sony PS3 & PS4 / DirecTV HR44-500 / DarbeeVision DVP-5000 / Panamax M5400-PM / Elgato HD60

        Comment

        • fugazi
          MVP
          • Apr 2003
          • 3749

          #30664
          Re: NFL Off Topic

          More rules, more officiating.. Means more of the outcome in the refs and leagues hands.

          Last night's no-call was absurd.

          The officiating in Dal/GB was inconsistent, at best.

          It's becoming somewhat unenjoyable to watch. Flags everywhere.

          Add to that the actions of players like Zadarrius Smith feigning injury as though this is fifa or the NCAA.

          League is getting awfully...made.
          Australian Rules Football...just sayin'

          Comment

          • ImTellinTim
            YNWA
            • Sep 2006
            • 33028

            #30665
            Re: NFL Off Topic

            Originally posted by Blzer
            I thought about this at that exact moment last night, as I do every time this happens. I brought it up once and can’t remember if anyone attempted to clarify why they do this. It doesn’t make any sense. He was inches away.
            They shouldn't be doing this on the goalline like Cardot said. But in the middle of the field they will do this on almost every first down. They will try to have the spot of the ball so that the tip of the ball is on a hashmark. Either back or forward, whichever is closer. That way they don't need to measure nearly as much. The half to quarter of a yard of accuracy doesn't really matter and it actually saves a lot of time.

            Comment

            • kehlis
              Moderator
              • Jul 2008
              • 27738

              #30666
              Re: NFL Off Topic

              Originally posted by Cardot
              One of my "officiating" pet peeves is whenever there is a close play at the goal line....where it looks like a ball carrier either crossed the goal line by a couple inches or was down a few inches short. If they deem he was short, they spot the ball way back at the one yard line. No one complains all that much, but at that part of the field, seems to me that there is a significant difference between 6 inches and 36 inches.
              Yea this happened in the Chargers/Broncos game last weekend on a fourth down and cost the Chargers a touchdown and gave the ball back to the Broncos.

              Comment

              • phenom1990
                MVP
                • Mar 2008
                • 4789

                #30667
                Re: NFL Off Topic

                Originally posted by slickdtc
                I think Mike Peirira (the rules analyst on the broadcast) hit it on the head last night when the late non-PI was challenged and upheld: they’re not saying there wasn’t PI, they’re saying it wasn’t egregious enough. He said the Saints/Rams non-call is pretty much the standard and if it’s not a complete mugging, it won’t get overturned.

                That’s umm, a strange way to implement this but also I think they know when we review things and slow them down there’s almost always a call to be made if the threshold is low. There’s always some contact, a hand around the waist, etc.

                It’s time for coaches/teams to adjust. Only phantoms PI calls will get reversed when the call is there was PI, and only absolutely completely missed calls will get the penalty when there wasn’t one originally.
                Yeah what he said last night is what spurred my thought.

                I just think that the standard used on PI is ridiculous given that is much clearer to figure out than the rest of reviewable plays.
                "Ma'am I don't make the rules up. I just think them up and write em down". - Cartman

                2013 and 2015 OS NFL Pick'em Champ...somehow I won 2 in 3 years.

                Comment

                • fugazi
                  MVP
                  • Apr 2003
                  • 3749

                  #30668
                  Re: NFL Off Topic

                  Originally posted by slickdtc

                  It’s time for coaches/teams to adjust
                  ...to easy calls being missed, and games lost, despite the ability to address most errors...and to a league that is not terribly concerned if it's rule-set will be inconsistently applied.


                  How much more obvious could last night's PI have been? He pinned the WRs arm...

                  We do realize that this kind of thing can be easily used to change the outcome of games and spreads, yes?

                  Not that this is new, but the mechanisms for it taking place and subsequently being chalked up to "rules interpretation" are very much in front of our faces
                  Australian Rules Football...just sayin'

                  Comment

                  • areobee401
                    Hall Of Fame
                    • Apr 2006
                    • 16771

                    #30669
                    Re: NFL Off Topic

                    Remove all video review from sports, please. Said the same thing many years ago. And now all my worst fears have become a reality.
                    http://twitter.com/smittyroberts

                    Comment

                    • slickdtc
                      Grayscale
                      • Aug 2004
                      • 17125

                      #30670
                      Re: NFL Off Topic

                      They opened Pandora’s box like everyone said they were, and this is their way of trying to contain it.

                      No replay sounds awful. Too much replay is pretty bad. That’s why I say we have to adjust, kinda find the middle ground and learn to cope with it. The catch rules didn’t always make sense, but once I understood the quirks of it I became pretty good at figuring out how they would be ruled on review based on how they generally called it. Similar deal here.
                      NHL - Philadelphia Flyers
                      NFL - Buffalo Bills
                      MLB - Cincinnati Reds


                      Originally posted by Money99
                      And how does one levy a check that will result in only a slight concussion? Do they set their shoulder-pads to 'stun'?

                      Comment

                      • steelerfan
                        MVP
                        • Jun 2003
                        • 4337

                        #30671
                        Re: NFL Off Topic

                        Originally posted by Blzer
                        I thought about this at that exact moment last night, as I do every time this happens. I brought it up once and can’t remember if anyone attempted to clarify why they do this. It doesn’t make any sense. He was inches away.

                        I also would like to know when the clock is supposed to stop after a field goal kick is attempted. Is it when the ball hits the ground? Because at the end of a quarter/half, they always seem to let the last few seconds run down after it goes through the uprights.
                        A rule was put in about 10-15 years ago that says a minimum of X seconds must be run off on every FG attempt. I believe X=5.

                        Comment

                        • ggsimmonds
                          Hall Of Fame
                          • Jan 2009
                          • 11235

                          #30672
                          Re: NFL Off Topic

                          Something I’m not used to saying, the AFC North may be the worst division in the league.

                          Seems odd because for the past 15 years or so it’s been consistently one of the best

                          Comment

                          • Anthraticus
                            Rookie
                            • Oct 2018
                            • 304

                            #30673
                            Re: NFL Off Topic

                            Originally posted by slickdtc
                            I think Mike Peirira (the rules analyst on the broadcast) hit it on the head last night when the late non-PI was challenged and upheld: they’re not saying there wasn’t PI, they’re saying it wasn’t egregious enough. He said the Saints/Rams non-call is pretty much the standard and if it’s not a complete mugging, it won’t get overturned.

                            That’s umm, a strange way to implement this but also I think they know when we review things and slow them down there’s almost always a call to be made if the threshold is low. There’s always some contact, a hand around the waist, etc.
                            Players would learn to adjust and stop grabbing & fouling all the time if they kept getting called on it. It's just that they've getting away with stuff for so long they'd have to relearn how to play 'clean'....but they'd do it.

                            Comment

                            • slickdtc
                              Grayscale
                              • Aug 2004
                              • 17125

                              #30674
                              Re: NFL Off Topic

                              Ravens trading with Rams for CB Marcus Peters.

                              I’ve always held a grudge against Peters for getting DROY over Ronald Darby a few years back, because he had a bunch of picks while Darby covered way better consistently. Peters still makes big plays and gives them up, while Darby just gives them up. Ha
                              NHL - Philadelphia Flyers
                              NFL - Buffalo Bills
                              MLB - Cincinnati Reds


                              Originally posted by Money99
                              And how does one levy a check that will result in only a slight concussion? Do they set their shoulder-pads to 'stun'?

                              Comment

                              • slickdtc
                                Grayscale
                                • Aug 2004
                                • 17125

                                #30675
                                Re: NFL Off Topic

                                And Rams trade 2 1sts and a 4th for Jalen Ramsey

                                Aqib Talib also to IR

                                They also traded for OL Austin Corbett from CLE

                                Rumors have Trent Williams going to CLE from WSH, too...
                                NHL - Philadelphia Flyers
                                NFL - Buffalo Bills
                                MLB - Cincinnati Reds


                                Originally posted by Money99
                                And how does one levy a check that will result in only a slight concussion? Do they set their shoulder-pads to 'stun'?

                                Comment

                                Working...