-
Fino Alla Fine
Lakers
Juventus
PSN: KingTocco -
Re: Xbox One
Everyone's different and no matter the console I usually make time for gaming. There's games that both consoles have that I love and enjoy. I'm a baseball fan so if I only have an Xbox I never get to play MLB the show, and I'm also a racing fan but Sony takes forever to come out with their grand turismo games. Forza on the other hand comes out more frequently and I prefer it over grand turismo. So If i only had one console I'd miss out on games I love. Clutter, space and money isn't really issue or hurting me so I'm ok with that plus I keep all my stuff neat.
Sent from my iPhone using Operation SportsNBA2K is the standard of sports games period.Comment
-
Re: Xbox One
I knew it was only a matter of time before it got to this smh..
But when you do post it's usually to bash Xbox.
Sent from my iPhone using Operation SportsNBA2K is the standard of sports games period.Comment
-
Re: Xbox One
Eh. Too many x1 exclusive were flops man. They really need to rethink their strategy and I'm sure they will eventually
Its just the days of riding off gears and and sci fi shooters arent working anymoreComment
-
Re: Xbox One
I can understand trying to be neat and that is getting to be a issue because I now have a SNES, Gamecube, Wii, Wii u, Ps3, Ps4, 4k player and a cable box all plugged into my TV and I don't really have any space left on my tv stand to put systems but I don't see me stopping when it comes to consoles. I do have a hard time keeping up with all the games though just not enough hours in the day.
While its just how I fell about xbox but its not like I go on and on about it. But my bad I will be more positive if and when I do post in this thread going forward so sorry man.Comment
-
Re: Xbox One
I have a 4K TV without HDR and the Xbox One S. When I play a 4K blu ray disc it outputs a message saying to connect Xbox to 4K tv with HDR for maximum performance or something to that effect. Can you not get 4K resolution from a 4K blu ray if your TV doesn't have HDR?
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
Re: Xbox One
I like you smallville but come on man. R&C was good but it's still a very soft reboot/remaster of the original game. UC4 was disappointing to me and ROTTR is the better game imo. TLG looks like a freaking PS2 game. Sorry but it does and it runs like one too. Drive Club is good and Evolution did a great job in the end and while I disagree with Sony letting Evolution Studios leave, it is in no way, shape or form good enough to wipe the crap off the tires of Forza Horizon 3 let alone being better. Gears of War 4 was freaking awesome and unlike Uncharted 4, I wasn't disappointed. In fact, it's still my 2016 game of the year.
Screw it.....a freaking racing/driving game in Forza Horizon 3 surpasses EVERY single PlayStation 4 exclusive through 2016. Wouldn't be surprised if after Horizon: Zero Dawn releases that Forza is still the better Horizon. And if im saying this, it's the damn truth.
This. Microsoft has depended on Halo, Gears and Forza way too much and they're starting to decline in sales and they have no new franchises to compliment them. That's the problem. Microsoft exclusives are rarely if ever intended to be franchises. They always see them for the most part as one and done. That's the mistake. Even if it doesn't work, you have to look at exclusives as being possible/potential franchises.
The Order 1886 was developed in mind of being a trilogy. Granted, thus far, that doesn't appear to be happening but still, that was Sony's intent. Microsoft needs to do the same thing even if it doesn't work.
Ricky.....im not saying that at all. What im saying is that Microsoft tends to focus on the online multi-player aspects OVER the single player campaign. In other words, the online multi-player aspects are far more important to Microsoft than they are for Sony. You can see this by the respective exclusives and the direction those exclusives take.
Gears of War 4 campaign was excellent and still my 2016 game of the year but the majority of people who buy it don't buy it for the campaign. They buy it for the online aspects. The single player campaigns in Microsoft exclusives whether good or bad are secondary to them and those who buy it.
That's what im saying. Has nothing to do with the quality of the single player campaign. Has to do with what Microsoft focuses and cares about the most. The developers could love the single player campaigns but going to back to the original Xbox, that's not the aspect and component that Microsoft cares about.
I said TLOUR has a multi-player component. The difference is that for Uncharted 4, TLOUR, etc., the majority who buy them play them for the single player story campaign first and foremost. The multi-player aspect is secondary.
It's basically the opposite between the two consoles, their visions, what they offer, what they focus on and care about. Nothing to do with good or bad. It's just that Microsoft's vision is online multi-player (just look at Scalebound) first and foremost while Sony's vision is single player story first and foremost.
Sorry if you think that im bashing the single player campaigns of Gears of War 4 because im definitely not doing so. Hope you can just get what im saying in regards to how Sony and Microsoft view their exclusives and what their primary focus is on.Comment
-
Re: Xbox One
Of course Sony has more variety, they have more volume. The only Xbox exclusives that matter are Halo, Gears, and Forza. Sony has more properties but they're just as guilty of online stuff as MS in my opinion. Going back to Demon's Souls with the Souls online, even now DriveClub was intended to be a social experience, they just failed. How does Scalebound being canceled show that MS is multi-player focused? It was a single player game that they didn't like how it turned out, it had nothing to do with multi-player. The difference is that MS doesn't seem to think it's important at all to have a wide array of exclusives, or the ones that they do have are random one offs like the Remedy games or Sunset Overdrive. Sony has just had a ton more time to hone in on the franchises they think are important and also at taking chances in launching new IPs in the first place.
Microsoft just tends to make, IMO, big mistakes. I remember when EA bought Bioware thinking "how the hell do you let this company making such critically acclaimed exclusives go?" The answer seems to be they have different priorities than me.Originally posted by G PericoComment
-
Re: Xbox One
Scalebound was originally shown and said to be a single player RPG. Which is great in my opinion. But then, Microsoft interfered and told Platinum Games to add in some kind of online component which became the four player co-op. Yeah, it makes sense because it would be your party with you but being forced to play online with three buddies (or not buddies) when you may want to play solo like almost every RPG known to man and it becomes a negative.
Microsoft basically killed the game by forcing an online component that was never originally intended for the game and then cancelled it. Makes no sense at all.
BioWare, Epic Games and Bungie all come to mind. It's the equivalent of Sony one day letting Naughty Dog, Sony Santa Monica and Sucker Punch/Guerrilla Games go. Simply mind boggling.Comment
Comment