PlayStation 4 Discussion
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion
This nonsense needs to stop, let us enjoy the newer systems for a FEW years, they are already forced feed us these in-between systems already, these moves are making me question gaming from MS or Sony anymore. Really ridiculous already.Last edited by RoyalBoyle78; 04-28-2017, 12:07 PM.N.Y Mets
N.Y Giants
N.Y Knicks
N.Y Islanders
Miami Hurricanes
Twitter - @RoyalBoyle78
XBOX LIVE - Royalboyle78
PSN - RoyalBoyle78Comment
-
Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion
Both Sony and MS should not release any new consoles until 2022, that would make the PS4 Pro 6 years old and Scorpio 5 years, still to early in my book.
They just need to stop with all this already.N.Y Mets
N.Y Giants
N.Y Knicks
N.Y Islanders
Miami Hurricanes
Twitter - @RoyalBoyle78
XBOX LIVE - Royalboyle78
PSN - RoyalBoyle78Comment
-
Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion
It's the new way consoles are done. Xbox went One. Three years later to One S and one year later to Scorpio. All upgrades. If true, PS4 goes 3 years to Pro and 2 more years to PRO PRO 5. If all stay backwards compatible it's not a huge deal.
Sent from my iPad using Operation SportsComment
-
Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion
It's the new way consoles are done. Xbox went One. Three years later to One S and one year later to Scorpio. All upgrades. If true, PS4 goes 3 years to Pro and 2 more years to PRO PRO 5. If all stay backwards compatible it's not a huge deal.
Sent from my iPad using Operation SportsLast edited by RoyalBoyle78; 04-28-2017, 12:30 PM.N.Y Mets
N.Y Giants
N.Y Knicks
N.Y Islanders
Miami Hurricanes
Twitter - @RoyalBoyle78
XBOX LIVE - Royalboyle78
PSN - RoyalBoyle78Comment
-
Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion
I'm surprised that Sony would consider another new console so soon, but I get it. If they believe Scorpio is going to make an impact, and they probably have a better idea than most of us since they have plenty of interaction with third party developers, then limiting Microsoft to one year with a console with a massive power advantage makes sense.
But it also plays into Microsoft's hands. I think they would love to see an arms race over the next several years, because Sony is nowhere near flush with enough cash to not have it affect their bottom line. You know MS will have their Scorpio+ ready to drop.Comment
-
Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion
The earliest I see PlayStation 5 is Fall 2019. Three years from PS4 to Pro and another three years from Pro to PS5. PS4 is dominating and destroying the competition. No reason to rush out PS5. If anything, the PS4 Pro wasn't even needed and is selling decent at best. Sony should have waited until PS5 to introduce 4K/HDR, etc. simply because the user install base of those with a 4K HDR TV would be a lot higher than what it is now. The install base would have already been pretty much set where as now, you're asking people to spend a lot of money on an upgraded PS4, a 4K HDR TV, etc. and this doesn't even include PSVR.
The PS4 Pro was in early stages of R&D BEFORE PlayStation 4 was even launched so I would say that Fall 2019 at the earliest for PS5. Any earlier would be a mistake especially when you have the PS4 dominating. Scorpio regardless of how powerful that is, isn't changing that, period. Scorpio will be the same as Pro.
Those who have a 4K HDR TV and want all the extra visuals and stuff will buy it while the majority sticks with the base/slim models.
The base PS4/Xbox One both lasted three years and are now pretty much done but that's because both have a slim model available at a cheaper price. The Pro and Scorpio will maybe hit 10% of the user install base, if that.
Sony has no reason to rush out PS5. They can go into hibernation for at least five years and they would still be dominating. Microsoft on the other hand is going in a different direction. Spencer wants the entire XBOX history to be connected and playable on an upgraded console every three to five years.
The problem with this is that with the next Xbox console, the CPU MUST be changed and updated to something that will actually be current and future proof at that time. Staying with the Jaguar is only going to hold both consoles back to where that makes no sense to me considering both seem to be looking towards the future. Can't do that with what will eventually be decade old tech.
Both Sony and Microsoft are heading in completely different and opposite directions.
(especially if you read Spencer's current interview - https://www.theguardian.com/technolo...s-phil-spencer)
I don't ever see Sony making PlayStation 5 backwards compatible with PlayStation 4. Simply because they spent $380M on Gaikai. Sony's eventual future in gaming is ALL STREAMING where as I see Microsoft eventual future being ALL DIGITAL.
Granted, I would say maybe 2030 at the earliest but it will eventually happen. You can just see it. Slowly but surely.
In summary, both companies will do what they want to do regardless of what we hope they do. It simply comes down to if you'll support either/both/neither of them.Comment
-
Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion
Not surprised. And, if you're a stockholder, all you want for them to do is make money.
Sony is a very diversified company with many different types of services. Back in Jan 2014 (just as the PS4 was introduced to the market) their shares of common stock was valued at $14-$15 per share. Come back to current times and the stock is now at $34-$35. Modest gains, but value gains for sure. Their TVs are not the number one seller anymore. Their entertainment conglomerates such as the Film and music industry does not produce like they did in the past. Besides semiconductors, electronics, and the financial services what do propose happened to lift them in value?
GAMESComment
-
Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion
They do this with cell phones. It should not surprise anyone. I am all for it.Comment
Comment