The Hangover: Part II
It was kind of strange when I didn't understand how literally every member on this message board was able to say "it was the exact same as the first one," but after watching it I now understand it. Plot point by plot point, character revelation by character revelation, and shocking comedic instance by shocking comedic instance, this movie was a carbon copy of the first one.
Truth be told, I'm not sure if there is really any other way that this film can make a sequel and be successful doing it in any other format. I first asked that question when it was announced to come out. How could it even be good? What would they have to do to make it rival the first one? Well, I don't quite think it got up there with the first one personally. It might have to do with the fact that we don't know how the first one should play out, plus Vegas really helped out IMO.
It certainly was a little more over-the-top, Ken Jeong fits less and less into the picture even though he's in the story (honestly, just keep him out of there), and the characters are still a sweet bunch. Alan is a little dumber, but is definitely still not without his hilarious antics.
I laughed at some one-liners in this one, but as an overall, I didn't crack up as much as in The Hangover. It might be because I was in a theater to see that, and that wasn't the case here. I don't know if it was a "worthy" sequel or not, but as far as making one for this franchise, it can be easy to do much worse.
I'm wondering what they have in store for us when they make Part III. Will it be more of the same? Time will tell on that one...
Comment