How many five year olds could you fight at once?

[GAMEC0CK2002]

Re: How many five year olds could you fight at once?

I'm thinking of the scene from Kill Bill Vol. 1, where Uma goes nuts and wastes the Crazy 88s.

Would the fight be like a martial arts movie, where you're battling 4 or 5 at once and the rest will sort of hang back and wait until you're finished to attack? If that's the case, I could probably take out over 100 before I collapsed. If they all rushed in tandem and didn't wait for me to fight them in small groups, I'd say around 25.

Exactly. I think people are forgetting that these kids are getting trained. So I'm sure they'd be taught to all rush at once like killer bees or fire ants. That would make it near impossible to pick them off one at a time. I'd say chances of survival are greatly reduced if it becomes more than 30 kids. Once they get you off your feet it would be game over.

[bjf1377]

Re: How many five year olds could you fight at once?

LOL, great thread. I think I could take on at least 60 of the little mongrels. I've been hit by 5 year olds before and it's not much. I could take down 2 at a time with no problem, and probably more. So, I'm gonna say somewhere in the range of 60-75

[bjf1377]

Re: How many five year olds could you fight at once?

LOL, great thread. I think I could take on at least 60 of the little mongrels. I've been hit by 5 year olds before and it's not much. I could take down 2 at a time with no problem, and probably more. So, I'm gonna say somewhere in the range of 60-75

[Stu]

Re: How many five year olds could you fight at once?

Exactly. I think people are forgetting that these kids are getting trained. So I'm sure they'd be taught to all rush at once like killer bees or fire ants. That would make it near impossible to pick them off one at a time. I'd say chances of survival are greatly reduced if it becomes more than 30 kids. Once they get you off your feet it would be game over.

That's why picking a kid up and using him as a weapon is the best strategy so far. You could swing him around and keep the other little ankle biters at bay.

[Stu]

Re: How many five year olds could you fight at once?

Exactly. I think people are forgetting that these kids are getting trained. So I'm sure they'd be taught to all rush at once like killer bees or fire ants. That would make it near impossible to pick them off one at a time. I'd say chances of survival are greatly reduced if it becomes more than 30 kids. Once they get you off your feet it would be game over.

That's why picking a kid up and using him as a weapon is the best strategy so far. You could swing him around and keep the other little ankle biters at bay.

[BigTigLSU]

Re: How many five year olds could you fight at once?

Exactly. I think people are forgetting that these kids are getting trained. So I'm sure they'd be taught to all rush at once like killer bees or fire ants. That would make it near impossible to pick them off one at a time. I'd say chances of survival are greatly reduced if it becomes more than 30 kids. Once they get you off your feet it would be game over.

Thats why I think the the throwing tatic mixed with the human bat strategy would work

[BigTigLSU]

Re: How many five year olds could you fight at once?

Exactly. I think people are forgetting that these kids are getting trained. So I'm sure they'd be taught to all rush at once like killer bees or fire ants. That would make it near impossible to pick them off one at a time. I'd say chances of survival are greatly reduced if it becomes more than 30 kids. Once they get you off your feet it would be game over.

Thats why I think the the throwing tatic mixed with the human bat strategy would work

[WTF]

Re: How many five year olds could you fight at once?

I don't know. It seems like a 5 year old would be close to knee level, if some charged from the front, and more from the bac, you would go down fairly quick. So if they were oriented, probably no more than 15-20.

But if they were the typical 5 year old with no training, probably around 50-75 before tiring out.

Oh, and great topic :y4:

[WTF]

Re: How many five year olds could you fight at once?

I don't know. It seems like a 5 year old would be close to knee level, if some charged from the front, and more from the bac, you would go down fairly quick. So if they were oriented, probably no more than 15-20.

But if they were the typical 5 year old with no training, probably around 50-75 before tiring out.

Oh, and great topic :y4:

[mgoblue]

Re: How many five year olds could you fight at once?

I don't know. It seems like a 5 year old would be close to knee level, if some charged from the front, and more from the bac, you would go down fairly quick. So if they were oriented, probably no more than 15-20.

But if they were the typical 5 year old with no training, probably around 50-75 before tiring out.

Oh, and great topic :y4:

yeah, I think we're overestimating the knowledge these kids would gain from the day of training...it's not like they're an army sharp-toothed midgets or anything, half of the kids would be picking their noses anyways...I don't think enough of that training would remain, and while 5 year olds can be vicious, without teamwork they'd be a piece of cake. It'd be like Gladiator, the gladiators were easy to kill alone, but when Maximus got them together they were a fighting force. Now if the 5 year olds had some prodigy leader in their midst, who could organize and lead them, then we have a whole different situation.

[mgoblue]

Re: How many five year olds could you fight at once?

I don't know. It seems like a 5 year old would be close to knee level, if some charged from the front, and more from the bac, you would go down fairly quick. So if they were oriented, probably no more than 15-20.

But if they were the typical 5 year old with no training, probably around 50-75 before tiring out.

Oh, and great topic :y4:

yeah, I think we're overestimating the knowledge these kids would gain from the day of training...it's not like they're an army sharp-toothed midgets or anything, half of the kids would be picking their noses anyways...I don't think enough of that training would remain, and while 5 year olds can be vicious, without teamwork they'd be a piece of cake. It'd be like Gladiator, the gladiators were easy to kill alone, but when Maximus got them together they were a fighting force. Now if the 5 year olds had some prodigy leader in their midst, who could organize and lead them, then we have a whole different situation.

[ZB9]

Re: How many five year olds could you fight at once?

Thats why I think the the throwing tatic mixed with the human bat strategy would work

LMFAO!!!

i think that's the first time those words have been used together in a sentence, ever on planet earth.

[ZB9]

Re: How many five year olds could you fight at once?

Thats why I think the the throwing tatic mixed with the human bat strategy would work

LMFAO!!!

i think that's the first time those words have been used together in a sentence, ever on planet earth.

[Anaxamander]

Re: How many five year olds could you fight at once?

After careful consideration (the kind only psychos like us would give this kind of thing), I think the best way to take utilize my size, speed, and power advantage would be a simple shoulder ram. Let's say the kids are all together in a group of 25. I'd get as low as I could, then plow right into them with the shoulder, perhaps knocking a few unconscious and knocking others to the ground. I'd stomp on the ones on the ground, all the while keeping my legs moving to escape the clutches of the ones trying to grab me. If they split up into smaller groups, I'd deal with those in similar fashion, busting them up like bowling pins. Once I'd mowed over enough of them, I could take the few remaining pretty easily.

[Anaxamander]

Re: How many five year olds could you fight at once?

After careful consideration (the kind only psychos like us would give this kind of thing), I think the best way to take utilize my size, speed, and power advantage would be a simple shoulder ram. Let's say the kids are all together in a group of 25. I'd get as low as I could, then plow right into them with the shoulder, perhaps knocking a few unconscious and knocking others to the ground. I'd stomp on the ones on the ground, all the while keeping my legs moving to escape the clutches of the ones trying to grab me. If they split up into smaller groups, I'd deal with those in similar fashion, busting them up like bowling pins. Once I'd mowed over enough of them, I could take the few remaining pretty easily.