The 2017-2018 EPL Discussion Thread
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
-
Re: The 2017-2018 EPL Discussion Thread
Fabregas is definitely prone to rash tackles but he’s also just a generally terrible defensive player who also happens to be a subpar athlete (for that level). You combine these things and anyone who watches him often wouldn’t really be surprised.
Like Brahv said, the two have history. Just like Aguero and Luiz.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
Re: The 2017-2018 EPL Discussion Thread
The FA Cup would be a nice consolation prize but it’s definitely not enough to reconcile this disastrous season.
Not to sound elitist but our aspirations are a little higher than FA Cups.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
Re: The 2017-2018 EPL Discussion Thread
Back to Chelsea, I'd agree that following a league title with an FA Cup and failure to secure a Champions League place would not be what was expected.
We all know that only at Arsenal an FA Cup equals a contract extension.Comment
-
Re: The 2017-2018 EPL Discussion Thread
We really shouldn’t be this far out of top 4 though, and if we don’t make top 4 (especially in a season where Hazard and Courtois are stalling on contract renewals), then we are pretty close to panic mode.Comment
-
Re: The 2017-2018 EPL Discussion Thread
I think this has to go for United, also. Even if they finish second behind an incredible City team and win an FA Cup, they're still underperforming and going out to Sevilla in the way they did was inexcusable.
Back to Chelsea, I'd agree that following a league title with an FA Cup and failure to secure a Champions League place would not be what was expected.
We all know that only at Arsenal an FA Cup equals a contract extension.
I expected City and United to be competing for the league this season, I didn't expect City to be this good but I thought United would be better.
Chelsea have obviously been down compared to their standards. Morata taking time to adjust to the league, injuries to players expected to step up and Conte not seeming happy. They will change their manager and probably win the league next season with most of the same squad.Current careers:
Enough is Enough | Buying Tottenham (FC 25)Comment
-
Re: The 2017-2018 EPL Discussion Thread
I think United is the one team that should really be disappointed with their season, even if they win the FA cup. Other teams don't compare to the money City or United have spent or have the recent history/manager profiles they have.
I expected City and United to be competing for the league this season, I didn't expect City to be this good but I thought United would be better.
Chelsea have obviously been down compared to their standards. Morata taking time to adjust to the league, injuries to players expected to step up and Conte not seeming happy. They will change their manager and probably win the league next season with most of the same squad.
Currently, they are on track for a similar point total to Spurs last season, who were mercilessly ridiculed for not putting up a bigger fight to our title challenge. 87 points is their max total if they lose to City, and that is only if they win out their remaining games. 87 points would put them well outside a title challenge in nearly every recent season with the exception of the freak Leicester season.
Even if City weren't doing this well, United would still be a few steps behind, which isn't very good for a club with that kind of resources.Comment
-
Re: The 2017-2018 EPL Discussion Thread
One of my least favorite excuses I see getting trotted out for United is that they are only being considered to be doing poorly because of how good City is.
Currently, they are on track for a similar point total to Spurs last season, who were mercilessly ridiculed for not putting up a bigger fight to our title challenge. 87 points is their max total if they lose to City, and that is only if they win out their remaining games. 87 points would put them well outside a title challenge in nearly every recent season with the exception of the freak Leicester season.
Even if City weren't doing this well, United would still be a few steps behind, which isn't very good for a club with that kind of resources.Current careers:
Enough is Enough | Buying Tottenham (FC 25)Comment
-
Re: The 2017-2018 EPL Discussion Thread
Plus City has the chance to win the title at home against United. That is going to stick in their craw really nicely if it happens.
EDIT: I just realized you're talking about the Eriksen goal, but I was actually thinking about Dele's first goal. They did the same thing.Last edited by ImTellinTim; 04-02-2018, 01:48 PM.Comment
-
Re: The 2017-2018 EPL Discussion Thread
Winning points per season;
2010/11 - 80
2011/12 - 89
2012/13 - 89
2013/14 - 86
2014/15 - 87
2015/16 - 81
2016/17 - 93
So in fact, 87 points would have given 3 league titles, possibly 4, in 7 seasons and would've been likely in the title race for all of them.Comment
-
Re: The 2017-2018 EPL Discussion Thread
Facts over feelings, bro.
Winning points per season;
2010/11 - 80
2011/12 - 89
2012/13 - 89
2013/14 - 86
2014/15 - 87
2015/16 - 81
2016/17 - 93
So in fact, 87 points would have given 3 league titles, possibly 4, in 7 seasons and would've been likely in the title race for all of them.
Anyway, original point still stands; City doing well shouldn't be an excuse for a club like United to be so far behind, especially playing the way they do.
Jose is a victim of his own success. He guarantees results, but if he isn't getting results then the style of football gets a big light put on it. His own standards are very high, and when you combine them with a team that has unlimited resources then he has to deliver. It's probably not fair to Jose, but there's not much he can do about it.Comment
-
Re: The 2017-2018 EPL Discussion Thread
He'll complain about the treatment he and the team receive even though they finish second and stayed in that place for so long, but it doesn't matter. You played the way you did to finish second? With that squad? You'll off course you'll be ridiculed endlessly.Comment
-
Re: The 2017-2018 EPL Discussion Thread
Lamela is so dirty, according to some people, that it called for an investigation. He's got the impressive amount of 0.17 yellow cards per match in all competitions since he joined Spurs. No red cards at all.
https://www.statbunker.com/players/g...layer_id=38479
As a comparison, Fabregas has 0.21 yellow cards per match during his time with Chelsea in addition to two red cards. Is he dirty too?
https://www.statbunker.com/players/g...layer_id=18214
Base your opinions on facts rather than feelings. Feelings are biased, facts aren't.
However, this example in particular implies that if an offense is not carded, that it is not dirty, which is certainly a strange, and most likely not very accurate measure of a players supposed 'dirtiness'
on that note, I don't think either player is what I would consider a 'dirty' player.Support Local Sports
Comment
-
Re: The 2017-2018 EPL Discussion Thread
100% on the facts not feelings train
However, this example in particular implies that if an offense is not carded, that it is not dirty, which is certainly a strange, and most likely not very accurate measure of a players supposed 'dirtiness'
on that note, I don't think either player is what I would consider a 'dirty' player.
He's a super physical player, but not necessarily dirty in general.
Similar to Aguero actually. Most people wouldn't say Aguero is overly dirty, but for some reason he seems to absolutely hate David Luiz.Comment
Comment