Home

MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

This is a discussion on MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread within the MLB The Show forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Baseball > MLB The Show
MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-26-2016, 08:48 PM   #41
AC
Win the East
 
AC's Arena
 
OVR: 36
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 14,953
Blog Entries: 5
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by WaitTilNextYear
What's the logic for the other team to trade their better first baseman to you for one that you don't want? You'll need to dip into your prospects or trade away some other position of value (a pitcher perhaps) to get something done here.
Well, Santana is quite cheap. I could see a Hanley or Holliday swap, maybe?
__________________
Quote:
"Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes
AC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 03-26-2016, 10:29 PM   #42
MVP
 
BlueJays09's Arena
 
OVR: 29
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
Blog Entries: 197
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Okay. Maybe this one is more significant. What about Pompey + Happ + Vlad Guerrero Jr to the Reds for Bruce + Cingrani


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
BlueJays09 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2016, 10:48 PM   #43
AC
Win the East
 
AC's Arena
 
OVR: 36
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 14,953
Blog Entries: 5
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueJays09
Okay. Maybe this one is more significant. What about Pompey + Happ + Vlad Guerrero Jr to the Reds for Bruce + Cingrani


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Illegal on 2/3 counts and an overpay and why would the Reds want Happ

Try to consider what the other team is looking for specifically instead of packaging several parts together.
__________________
Quote:
"Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes
AC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2016, 10:50 PM   #44
MVP
 
BlueJays09's Arena
 
OVR: 29
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
Blog Entries: 197
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by AC
Illegal on 2/3 counts and an overpay and why would the Reds want Happ



Try to consider what the other team is looking for specifically instead of packaging several parts together.


It won't be illegal in a few months. It's pretty much Bruce for Pompey and Vlad JR. I thought that was a fair price considering he was going cheap according to reports. Happ is there for cap reasons and he could be shipped by the Reds to get another prospect?

If that's not the case I guess I will have to revisit...
BlueJays09 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2016, 10:57 PM   #45
Rookie
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Nov 2013
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

I would hold on to vlad....

Sent from my SM-G850W using Tapatalk
decefay is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 03-26-2016, 11:07 PM   #46
AC
Win the East
 
AC's Arena
 
OVR: 36
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 14,953
Blog Entries: 5
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueJays09
It won't be illegal in a few months. It's pretty much Bruce for Pompey and Vlad JR. I thought that was a fair price considering he was going cheap according to reports. Happ is there for cap reasons and he could be shipped by the Reds to get another prospect?

If that's not the case I guess I will have to revisit...
Happ was just signed to a market value contract, so no. That's also assuming a ton of risk. Also kind of an overpay.

What exactly are you trying to accomplish here?
__________________
Quote:
"Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes
AC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2016, 12:46 AM   #47
Banned
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Mar 2016
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by WaitTilNextYear
What's the logic for the other team to trade their better first baseman to you for one that you don't want? You'll need to dip into your prospects or trade away some other position of value (a pitcher perhaps) to get something done here.
Because another team could use Santana who's an obp machine who can hit 20-25 HR on a good contract that can play 1B, C or even 3B for their 1B who's only an average OBP 15-18 HR guy who can only play 1st that he does it well. It's not like it's trading Mark Reynolds for Mike Napoli kind of deal. It's a different fit for a different team for both sides kind of deal
TitoFranc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2016, 12:49 AM   #48
Banned
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Mar 2016
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by AC
Well, Santana is quite cheap. I could see a Hanley or Holliday swap, maybe?
Both of those guys contracts are too heavy for the Indians (plus their age as Holiday would be 37?)
TitoFranc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Baseball > MLB The Show »



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:59 PM.
Top -