Home

MONK is a SEMI-FINALIST!!! Let's hope he makes it!

This is a discussion on MONK is a SEMI-FINALIST!!! Let's hope he makes it! within the Pro Football forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Football > Pro Football
MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-29-2007, 04:58 PM   #9
MVP
 
plasticbeast's Arena
 
OVR: 11
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Morgantown
Re: MONK is a SEMI-FINALIST!!! Let's hope he makes it!

IMO a WR that can put up the #'s that Monk did in a Joe Gibbs offense, with different QB's every few years deserves to be in the Hall. He was an amazing down field blocker also, arguably the best at the WR position. AND the MOST important part not only was he good, he was a true Role Model: Quiet, reserved, he let his actions on the field speak for him. A Great Human Being! Too bad it seems like we have less and less of these types of players in the league now.

Of course I am a little biased...
__________________
www.simgamingnetwork.com Come join our leagues!

OSFL
: Lake County Extreme- 2010 OSFL Champs
NCFA: WVU Mountaineers- As long as we beat Pitt...
BLB: Morgantown Mowhawks- Expansion Team
plasticbeast is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 05:41 PM   #10
#HTownTakeover #YWCF
 
coogrfan's Arena
 
OVR: 27
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 15,576
Re: MONK is a SEMI-FINALIST!!! Let's hope he makes it!

Monk was a very good player, but that isn't what the HoF is about. The Hall is for the truly great.

Monk averaged 13.5 yds/catch for his career. Of the 18 wr's from the modern era (a majority of a members' career occurred after 1946) enshrined in Canton, only one (Tom Fears, Rams 1948-56) averaged less than 14 yards per catch. The average yds/catch for those 18 players is 16.42, almost three full yards more than Monk's career avg.

Monk played in more games (224) than all but two of the HoF wr's, and yet nine of those players had more career td's. Steve Largent, who many consider to be the greatest possession receiver of all-time and whose record for receptions Monk broke, averaged 16 yds/catch (2.5 yds more than AM). Largent also scored more td's than Monk (100 to 68), despite playing in 24 fewer games.

Monk was a terrific possession receiver and from all accounts is a genuinely good person, but he just was not a great wide receiver. For that reason I believe he will remain on the outside looking in.
coogrfan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 06:00 PM   #11
Rookie
 
OVR: 4
Join Date: Oct 2003
Re: MONK is a SEMI-FINALIST!!! Let's hope he makes it!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jasong7777
Art Monk deserves to be in. PERIOD

But isn't it true that Art Monk was never the best, the 2nd best, the 3rd best, or even the 4th best receiver in the NFL in any single year during his long career? He had good stats, and was always considered a very good WR... but he never came close to being the best at any one time.

If fact, in many years he wasn't even the best receiver on his own team.

I just don't think Art Monk deserves the Hall of Fame. Players enshrined in the Hall should be the ones who were considered among the best at some point in their career. Art Monk doesn't fit the criteria. He was just very good for a very long time.

Merge Art Monk (extended longevity) and Terrell Davis (short-term greatness) together, and you have the perfect candidate. Individually, neither guy deserves to be in Canton.

Even though it'd be heart warming to see nice guys like Art Monk and Terrell Davis rewarded with a place in Canton, I don't think it's right. You have to draw the line somewhere, or else the Pro Football Hall of Fame becomes cheap and meaningless. Like Baseball Hall of Fame, where everyone and their grandmother gets enshrined.
platic is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 11-29-2007, 06:08 PM   #12
Banned
 
OVR: 3
Join Date: Apr 2006
Re: MONK is a SEMI-FINALIST!!! Let's hope he makes it!

Ummm, the Seahawks had no other reliable receivers to throw to during the Largent era. Art Monk played with Gary Clark and for a short time Ricky Sanders. One of the greatest trios of receivers ever. There's no doubt in my mind Art would have had Largentesque numbers if he would've remained the only "real" option.

Don't get me wrong, I realize what Largent accomplished. But, to not recognize Art Monk as one of the greatest because of meaningless stats is just pitiful. Yards per catch don't mean much if you lose games.

It's silly to argue stats such as these because he MADE hundreds of CLUTCH catches that set up Redskins TD's by other players. For a team game I'd say that's rather important.
dizturbd is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 06:50 PM   #13
binging
 
SPTO's Arena
 
OVR: 53
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The 905
Posts: 68,062
Blog Entries: 46
Re: MONK is a SEMI-FINALIST!!! Let's hope he makes it!

Quote:
Originally Posted by coogrfan
Monk was a very good player, but that isn't what the HoF is about. The Hall is for the truly great.
Monk is the 80s version of Marvin Harrison so if you think Harrison is a HOFer you have to think Monk is one too. I hope he gets in, the guy had most of the significant WR records when he retired until Jerry Rice blew them away.

BTW nice to see my boy Andre Reed make the Semis as well.
__________________
Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club

"Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. Parker
SPTO is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 06:53 PM   #14
All Star
 
Brandon13's Arena
 
OVR: 30
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 8,918
Re: MONK is a SEMI-FINALIST!!! Let's hope he makes it!

Quote:
Originally Posted by SPTO
Monk is the 80s version of Marvin Harrison so if you think Harrison is a HOFer you have to think Monk is one too. I hope he gets in, the guy had most of the significant WR records when he retired until Jerry Rice blew them away.

BTW nice to see my boy Andre Reed make the Semis as well.
I don't know much about Monk because he was mostly before my time, but from what I've read he was never considered one of the top three or four receivers in the league. Harrison has been/was a top three receiver for a long time.
Brandon13 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 06:57 PM   #15
binging
 
SPTO's Arena
 
OVR: 53
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The 905
Posts: 68,062
Blog Entries: 46
Re: MONK is a SEMI-FINALIST!!! Let's hope he makes it!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandon13
I don't know much about Monk because he was mostly before my time, but from what I've read he was never considered one of the top three or four receivers in the league. Harrison has been/was a top three receiver for a long time.
He's the Marvin Harrison of the 80s in terms of talent. The thing is, he was part of a very balanced offense that didn't revolve around him. He never complained about the number of balls thrown to him and while he was never regarded as one of the best receivers of his era at the time he was one of the more dependable ones.

He's a HOF'er in my book.
__________________
Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club

"Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. Parker
SPTO is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 11-29-2007, 11:10 PM   #16
Banned
 
OVR: 13
Join Date: Jun 2007
Re: MONK is a SEMI-FINALIST!!! Let's hope he makes it!

Quote:
Originally Posted by platic
But isn't it true that Art Monk was never the best, the 2nd best, the 3rd best, or even the 4th best receiver in the NFL in any single year during his long career? He had good stats, and was always considered a very good WR... but he never came close to being the best at any one time.

If fact, in many years he wasn't even the best receiver on his own team.

I just don't think Art Monk deserves the Hall of Fame. Players enshrined in the Hall should be the ones who were considered among the best at some point in their career. Art Monk doesn't fit the criteria. He was just very good for a very long time.

Merge Art Monk (extended longevity) and Terrell Davis (short-term greatness) together, and you have the perfect candidate. Individually, neither guy deserves to be in Canton.

Even though it'd be heart warming to see nice guys like Art Monk and Terrell Davis rewarded with a place in Canton, I don't think it's right. You have to draw the line somewhere, or else the Pro Football Hall of Fame becomes cheap and meaningless. Like Baseball Hall of Fame, where everyone and their grandmother gets enshrined.
Terrell Davis deserves to be in the hall of fame.
yvesdereuter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Football > Pro Football »



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:12 AM.
Top -