Home

Are the Colts underachievers?

This is a discussion on Are the Colts underachievers? within the Pro Football forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Football > Pro Football
MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-07-2009, 01:18 AM   #1
Pro
 
OVR: 8
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Indianapolis,In
Are the Colts underachievers?

Bob Kravitz Indystar.com

Quote:
SAN DIEGO -- Another 12-victory season . . . and nothing.
Another Peyton Manning MVP season . . . and nothing.

******** type=text/javascript> OAS_AD('160x600_1'); ******** language=javascript1.1 src="http://gannett.gcion.com/addyn/3.0/5111.1/133600/0/-1/ADTECH;size=160x600;alias=in-indianapolis.indystar.com/sports/columnist/article.htm_160x600_1;cookie=info;loc=100;target=_ blank;grp=731499;misc=1231307720686">
Another Tony Dungy playoff appearance, his record 10th straight . . . and nothing.
Another glorious chance to advance to a Super Bowl, their second in three years, with the New England Patriots out of the way and the AFC unfettered by the existence of a dominant team . . . and nothing.
Let's just say it how it is: The Colts are the ultimate paper tigers. And if you don't like the Atlanta Braves comparison -- multiple postseason appearances, one championship -- feel free to come up with your own. But how can a franchise be so routinely dominant year after year, and yet be found so routinely lacking when the brightest lights are shining?
Saturday night's 23-17 overtime loss to the short-handed San Diego Chargers was all too typical of the Colts' recent postseason history.
It happens year after year after frustrating and infuriating year. And it's always something. The weather in New England. The officiating in New England. The long layoff before Pittsburgh. The Dwight Freeney injury against San Diego.
It's always something.
And yet teams like last year's Giants march on despite losing Jeremy Shockey, or the Chargers win this game without their top running back.
If it happens once, it's an anomaly. But this happens time and time again. It's a trend, and it's something Jim Irsay and Bill Polian have got to address. The nagging problem this year was that running game, the one Polian kept insisting was just fine, despite ample statistical evidence to the contrary.
It wasn't fine.
It was never fine.
And now the Colts are going on vacation way before a team with this talent, this pedigree, ought to be hitting the links.
These were not just the 8-8 San Diego Chargers. These were the 8-8 Chargers without a reasonable facsimile of LaDainian Tomlinson, who didn't even play in the second half because of a serious groin injury. These were the 8-8 Chargers with Antonio Gates struggling with a high ankle sprain. And yet, there was Gates, maybe the toughest guy on the field, riding Antoine Bethea downfield for a monster first down on San Diego's game-winning drive in overtime.
Last year, the Chargers beat the Colts with backup quarterback Billy Volek, or as we came to call him, Billy Freaking Volek. This year, the Chargers beat the Colts with Mike Scifres, a punter, and a magical elf named Darren Sproles, who merely filled in for Tomlinson and produced 328 all-purpose yards.
And, oh yes, there was the San Diego defense, which held the Colts' underperforming offense in check, as is often the case in the playoffs. For all of Manning's greatness, for all the weapons the Colts have on that side of the football, the fact is, Manning is sub-.500 in the playoffs, along with his head coach. The running game was a cipher. Marvin Harrison was invisible, as he usually is during the playoffs. Still think Harrison is coming back next season?
Predictably, the Colts defense will get pounded this morning and for the rest of the week, and those three defensive penalties on the game-winning drive don't speak well of their discipline down the stretch, but they did force two San Diego turnovers in the end zone on potential game-tying or go-ahead drives.
They played well enough to win.
Bottom line is, when the Colts needed a third-and-short conversion, they couldn't get it. You can't win in the playoffs if you can't run the football.
It's pretty elemental stuff. The Colts couldn't run it. Couldn't run it all season, couldn't run it all night, couldn't run it when one conversion on third-and-2 with 2:30 left in regulation and San Diego out of timeouts could have put this game away.
One and done.
Or, should we say, one and Dungy.
If (when) Tony Dungy decides to retire sometime next week, will there be a great hue and cry for him to come back and give it another shot? As much as this town loves and reveres him and appreciates him for everything he's done on and off the field, isn't it time for a new face, a new voice, something different?
At this point, it's going to be tough selling fans on Jim Caldwell who, at least from a distance, promises to bring more of the same.
Overtime?
Of course it went overtime.
Because they're the Colts and the Chargers. Because they don't know how to play football games that don't end on the final drive, the final play, the final gasp. Because they've developed as good of a rivalry as you will ever see between two teams who aren't in the same division.
It took more than 60 minutes to decide, but the deserving team won.
There's no nice way of saying what has to be said:
Paper tigers.
Folding again.

Colts won 14 games in 2005, then lost their first playoff game. Colts won 12 in 2006, then won the Super Bowl. Colts won 13 in 2007, then lost in their first playoff game. Colts won 12 in 2008, then lost in their first playoff game. I'm going to say it right now: For the Colts to go winless in three of the last four postseasons -- with one of the best quarterbacks ever, and all the offensive talent, with two excellent defensive ends and an enforcer safety -- is inexcusable,I agree with him 100%.
__________________
Colts
Red Sox
Blackhawks
Pacers/Heat
Michigan

clerks37 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 01-07-2009, 01:21 AM   #2
Need A Life
 
bkrich83's Arena
 
OVR: 64
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: So. Cal
Posts: 70,885
Blog Entries: 125
Re: Are the Colts underachievers?

I don't think they underachieve, they did win a SB not that long ago. They are a good team, but they have significant holes and are not as good as maybe people initially thought they were.

They are very soft vs. the run, if they don't get pressure on the QB with their two DE's their secondary is very vulnerable. And they don't run the ball.

If you can't run the ball, or stop the run, it's tough to be successful no matter who your QB is.
bkrich83 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2009, 02:06 AM   #3
MVP
 
OVR: 15
Join Date: Jun 2003
Re: Are the Colts underachievers?

An unnamed sports radio talk show host (he's unnamed because I'm not trying to blow his name up but I'm sure many will know exactly who I'm talking about) is trying to place all of the blame on Dungy saying its his time to go, all the while the quarterback, who has a rep for not performing well in big games and has had this rep since his college days, goes unscathed by said talk show host who mentions that he's basically the best QB of all time and that should be a reason why the Colts should have a dynasty. Don Shula had Marino for 16 years and they didn't win the chip, I wonder why that wasn't mentioned........

This same guy goes about to mention Andy Reid being 7-0 in divisional games, but how many championships does Andy Reid have? Would you rather have 7-0 in divisional games, 4 conf. champ appearances and a Super Bowl loss, or a not as good divisional playoff record and the chip? I know which one Eagles fans would take.

I looked on colts.com message boards, and some (not the majority, but some) actually let their QB go free of blame, but at the same time calling for Dungy's head (to the extent that he should step down because of this coaching performance the past 7 years).

Personally, I think this talk show host was trying to make a shock value statement, and he wanted to drum his shallow point in by asking not one, but TWO of his interviewees the same question; both replied with reasonable answers I'm sure he didn't want to hear.

This team had significant holes which deserve way more of the blame for this season than the head coach or the quarterback, who saw his running game and HOF WR seemingly vanish right before his eyes virtually overnight.

I'm not trying to remove all of the blame from Dungy's plate........... but honestly, I think some Colts fans just want to change for the sake of change, thinking that they were underachievers and that their team is better than it really is.
__________________
Favorite Teams:
NBA: Houston Rockets
NFL: Tennessee Titans
MLB: Chicago White Sox
NCAA: Florida State Seminoles


PlayaHataSupreme is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2009, 04:09 AM   #4
Pro
 
OVR: 7
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Charleston, Illinois
Re: Are the Colts underachievers?

Underachievers don't win NFL Championships.
__________________
Free LSUFan2004 and GoDevilsASU!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cebby
So the ACC should work around FSU having the worst academic scandal in recent history? Maybe FSU should stop cheating, fighting, packing gats, and act like normal people.
pistoldill is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2009, 08:48 AM   #5
Banned
 
OVR: 8
Join Date: Dec 2007
Re: Are the Colts underachievers?

Big time. It seems every single year come playoff time, that Colts fast break-change the play at the line offense comes apart every single time. Those linemen get confused or out of synch or something. Peyton is lucky that he got one, because he would be known as the ULTIMATE choker if he hadn't.
tmulk is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 01-07-2009, 09:12 AM   #6
Bamma
 
ProfessaPackMan's Arena
 
OVR: 36
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DC/MD
Posts: 63,591
Blog Entries: 3
Re: Are the Colts underachievers?

They need to scrap that Cover 2 Defense.
ProfessaPackMan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2009, 10:32 AM   #7
Marvel's Finest
 
JBH3's Arena
 
OVR: 48
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 13,523
Blog Entries: 48
Re: Are the Colts underachievers?

Nope their not underachievers...Underachieveing IMO would be having that roster of players and NOT making the playoffs.

The competition is stiff in the playoffs, and Indy ran into a team playing their best football of the season heading into the playoffs.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Edmund Burke
All that is needed for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing.
JBH3 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2009, 10:36 AM   #8
MVP
 
OVR: 24
Join Date: Oct 2005
Blog Entries: 6
Re: Are the Colts underachievers?

No, the Colts have limped in the playoffs the last two years. There was always some significant injury or loss. Last year it was Freeney and Mathis, among others. This year it was no-names at DT after losing Ed Johnson (that one hurt) along with shuffling the OLine right before the chargers game due to injury and starting corner Marlin Jackson is on IR allowing Tim Jennings whose name is synonomous with Penalty playing most of the season. Throw in leading tackler Gary Brackett and there you go.

Its not an exscuse but not many teams can lose starters and continue to win. Maybe one or two, but not several.
__________________
Follow me on Twitter - http://twitter.com/complex219
Complex is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Football > Pro Football »



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:17 AM.
Top -