Madden 2010 News Post

Madden NFL 10: Chicago Bears Ratings (ESPN Videogames)

11:35 AM - June 8, 2009 by iamemmittsmith

ESPN Videogames will be posting player ratings for Madden NFL 10, on a team by team basis, starting with the NFC North, and the Chicago Bears.

Quote:


	"Starting today, ESPN Video Games is unveiling the "Madden NFL 10" ratings, highlighting a division each week and revealing a team a day. First up, the NFC North and the Chicago Bears."

Game: Madden NFL 10Reader Score: 7.5/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PS3 / Wii / Xbox 360Votes for game: 76 - View All

Madden NFL 10 Videos

Member Comments

# 21 Da Bears @ 06/08/09 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mars85042


	Loaded? You mean loaded like lots of players, or loaded like they make lots of money? Cause they sure aren't loaded with talent WR is there weak spot, they need Plaxico; get him NOW! Lol.....

The wideouts are fine,the O-line and QB will make them better.

# 22 CKW11 @ 06/08/09 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mars85042


	Loaded? You mean loaded like lots of players, or loaded like they make lots of money? Cause they sure aren't loaded with talent WR is there weak spot, they need Plaxico; get him NOW! Lol.....

I think he was being sarcastic, or at least i hope he was...

# 23 pigspigs76 @ 06/08/09 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moostache


	select a team and it will give you the date their ratings will be posted....

booo your a lier!

# 24 fcb-santana @ 06/08/09 01:19 PM

I do think that Tillman should be a little faster, Steltz too.

Everything else looks good to me.

# 25 mars85042 @ 06/08/09 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Da Bears


	The wideouts are fine,the O-line and QB will make them better.

If you are truly a Bears fan, you know Plaxico + Bears = NFC championship!
I like the bears too I just know there week spot, don�t be in denial.
It is what it is.

# 26 mvb34 @ 06/08/09 01:27 PM

Why don't they show the route running rating from the receivers and backs?

# 27 CM Hooe @ 06/08/09 01:32 PM

I like this idea.

# 28 Purple28Pedestrian @ 06/08/09 01:37 PM

they got some serious speed there....I can't believe hester is still 99, i would think they'd keep that only for Chris Johnson,

i feel like the speed rating is one of the few that only matters. Even though it's supposed to have changed this year i have my doubts

# 29 Da Bears @ 06/08/09 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mars85042


	If you are truly a Bears fan, you know Plaxico + Bears = NFC championship! I like the bears too I just know there week spot, don’t be in denial. It is what it is.

Bears fan since 1983 my friend.If I think the Bears WR will be fine thats my opinion.You can't change my opinion .

# 30 feeq14 @ 06/08/09 01:40 PM

Tillma should be a bit better than an 82, but that is based on attitudes from last years ratings. If 82 represent Average to below avg speed then I am ok I guess. Tilmans real isue is lateral quickness so his AGI should be lower along with his man coverage.

Harris, Forte, and Url are a bit to high

Forte spd 90 does not compute

Hester should be a bit better

# 31 Siggy778 @ 06/08/09 01:46 PM

I think it's going to take a lot of people some time before they get used to the ratings being more spread out.

I don't like how there's no "Strip Ball" rating for defenders. Tillman would be a 95+ on those

The only thing I have a problem with is Danieal Manning being speed 88. He's arguably as fast as Hester and way stronger. I love him in KR's in real life.

# 32 Da Bears @ 06/08/09 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Siggy778


	I think it's going to take a lot of people some time before they get used to the ratings being more spread out. I don't like how there's no "Strip Ball" rating for defenders. Tillman would be a 95+ on those The only thing I have a problem with is Danieal Manning being speed 88. He's arguably as fast as Hester and way stronger. I love him in KR's in real life.

This is true.

# 33 Altimus @ 06/08/09 02:01 PM

They dropped Hester's rating even though he had an improvement year in that position. And they put him as the same rating as a player that took one snap the entire year. Nice.

# 34 TeamofdaDecade @ 06/08/09 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pigspigs76


	booo your a lier!

or u can just change the team ID in the url from 1-32 with bears being #1, vikings 32, etc.

# 35 DirtyBird @ 06/08/09 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tyler289


	Man, the Bears are loaded at WR.

Their ratings don't seem very good though...

# 36 Broncos86 @ 06/08/09 02:25 PM

Has everyone completely forgotten that the ratings scale has changed?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donny Moore


	Madden 09= 27 WR (90+)...Madden 10= 14 WR (90+)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donny Moore


	Mr. @dhall23 locked in at 79 OVR for Madden NFL 10....keep in mind too, we stretched ratings out, Madden 10 79 = Madden 09 85-86

# 37 Smoke316 @ 06/08/09 02:27 PM

i love the layout by espn great job. Ign does something similiar closer to launch but its really a pain to read.

# 38 Broncos86 @ 06/08/09 03:07 PM

Everyone's a rating guru.

# 39 GrnEyedBanditTN @ 06/08/09 03:12 PM

i went back an re-read the ratings blog... 40 time isn't the only factor in speed rating. Forte's 4.44 at the combine would translate to a 91 spd rating if just 40 alone. Manning's speed is way off!

# 40 Glorious Arc @ 06/08/09 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cowboyscowboys


	I am not liking the lack of athletic ratings for the first set of CB's. Also Brian Urlacher is more athletic then 90% of the Bears DB's, this is were I have a hard time accepting the extreme rating changes. I know by no means are their CB's burners playing Cover 2 Charles Tillman 82 Speed Nathan Vasher 85 Speed Brian Urlacher 85 speed <-- that urks me so bad, yes I realize early in his career he could run like a "safety" but he is slowin down now. Ray Lewis is faster then Charles Tillman gosh I don't want to have to edit 75% of the rosters but it will actually kill me to see it.

I was thinking to myself...82? I dont watch much bears play so I am not able to give a good judgement but I was shocked to see how slow the DBs were.

« Previous 123 4 5 6 7 Next »

More Links

Madden NFL 10: Chicago Bears Ratings (ESPN Videogames)