MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread
I was thinking something like Espinoza, Eduardo Rodriguez and maybe Benitendi. But at this point I dunno, as I said, I'm not very good with trades. That's why I come here, I like to get you guise's insight. I'm kinda new to baseball. Only been watching it for about 5 years since I'm from Europe and I'm only now starting to look at trades and how they make sense. But obviously I still got a lot to learnMy teams:
Soccer (It's football, not soccer!!): SL Benfica
Baseball: Oakland A's/ San Francisco Giants
Football: San Francisco 49ersComment
-
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread
I was thinking something like Espinoza, Eduardo Rodriguez and maybe Benitendi. But at this point I dunno, as I said, I'm not very good with trades. That's why I come here, I like to get you guise's insight. I'm kinda new to baseball. Only been watching it for about 5 years since I'm from Europe and I'm only now starting to look at trades and how they make sense. But obviously I still got a lot to learnNewYork Mets | NewYork Knicks | NewYork "Football" Giants
NBA 2k17 | Philadelphia 76ers 9-33Comment
-
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread
That's a lot better. I find the best trades hurt a bit. I think that's completely fine value wise, but I don't know if the Mets would do it philosophically. I think they'd rather target a young hitter. Think like one of these guys.
http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.asp...0637&players=0
That should have a filter on it for players with less than 5 WAR. So guys like Yelich, Joc, Polanco, maybe Odor, etc. I'm not sure who the Sox have like that, although if JBJ is legit then maybe thee's a fit. Mookie is too much, I wouldn't deal him for Harvey honestly. Xander might work, actually, but he might be a bit much."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread
That's a lot better. I find the best trades hurt a bit. I think that's completely fine value wise, but I don't know if the Mets would do it philosophically. I think they'd rather target a young hitter. Think like one of these guys.
http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.asp...0637&players=0
That should have a filter on it for players with less than 5 WAR. So guys like Yelich, Joc, Polanco, maybe Odor, etc. I'm not sure who the Sox have like that, although if JBJ is legit then maybe thee's a fit. Mookie is too much, I wouldn't deal him for Harvey honestly. Xander might work, actually, but he might be a bit much.
Harvey for JBJ and the A's?My teams:
Soccer (It's football, not soccer!!): SL Benfica
Baseball: Oakland A's/ San Francisco Giants
Football: San Francisco 49ersComment
-
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread
Well you won't be able to make that yet. We don't really know if JBJ can sustain any of this. Would have to wait until the offseason more than likely. If it was now it'd probably be JBJ + Benintendi etc"Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread
That's a lot better. I find the best trades hurt a bit. I think that's completely fine value wise, but I don't know if the Mets would do it philosophically. I think they'd rather target a young hitter. Think like one of these guys.
http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.asp...0637&players=0
That should have a filter on it for players with less than 5 WAR. So guys like Yelich, Joc, Polanco, maybe Odor, etc. I'm not sure who the Sox have like that, although if JBJ is legit then maybe thee's a fit. Mookie is too much, I wouldn't deal him for Harvey honestly. Xander might work, actually, but he might be a bit much.
What you guys think about something like this !?
Mets get
Jackie Bradley Jr
Yoan Moncada
Anderson Espinoza
Red Sox get
Matt HarveyNewYork Mets | NewYork Knicks | NewYork "Football" Giants
NBA 2k17 | Philadelphia 76ers 9-33Comment
-
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread
I'd prefer to switch Moncada with Benintendi or Devers, but other than that looks good. But let's see what AC or the others sayMy teams:
Soccer (It's football, not soccer!!): SL Benfica
Baseball: Oakland A's/ San Francisco Giants
Football: San Francisco 49ersComment
-
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread
If they end up trading him that probably works. I could legit see the Sox losing that trade so it's probably fair.
I'm still not sold Harvey gets traded, but if someone in here wants him that bad I think I'm at the point I could reasonably see it. Actually, let me make one change.
Mets get
Jackie Bradley Jr
Yoan Moncada
Anderson Espinoza
Red Sox get
Matt Harvey
Curtis Granderson
Logan Verrett
I think that works, although I still think it'd probably be Boogers going the other way. Seems like kind of a natural fit with the Mets not having a real SS. Just kinda complicated with Bogaerts doing this whole inflated BABIP act over 2 years."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread
If they end up trading him that probably works. I could legit see the Sox losing that trade so it's probably fair.
I'm still not sold Harvey gets traded, but if someone in here wants him that bad I think I'm at the point I could reasonably see it. Actually, let me make one change.
Mets get
Jackie Bradley Jr
Yoan Moncada
Anderson Espinoza
Red Sox get
Matt Harvey
Curtis Granderson
Logan Verrett
I think that works, although I still think it'd probably be Boogers going the other way. Seems like kind of a natural fit with the Mets not having a real SS. Just kinda complicated with Bogaerts doing this whole inflated BABIP act over 2 years.My teams:
Soccer (It's football, not soccer!!): SL Benfica
Baseball: Oakland A's/ San Francisco Giants
Football: San Francisco 49ersComment
-
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread
If they end up trading him that probably works. I could legit see the Sox losing that trade so it's probably fair.
I'm still not sold Harvey gets traded, but if someone in here wants him that bad I think I'm at the point I could reasonably see it. Actually, let me make one change.
Mets get
Jackie Bradley Jr
Yoan Moncada
Anderson Espinoza
Red Sox get
Matt Harvey
Curtis Granderson
Logan Verrett
I think that works, although I still think it'd probably be Boogers going the other way. Seems like kind of a natural fit with the Mets not having a real SS. Just kinda complicated with Bogaerts doing this whole inflated BABIP act over 2 years.
I will be making this trade in the offseason.Last edited by Dirty_D_; 05-19-2016, 09:34 PM.NewYork Mets | NewYork Knicks | NewYork "Football" Giants
NBA 2k17 | Philadelphia 76ers 9-33Comment
-
MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread
I am approaching the end of season 1 and playoffs are around the corner. I am just looking at some players futures with my team and Devon Travis stands out.
He missed the first month and a half and since his return he hasn't been great. He is hitting .254 with 5 homers and 21 RBI. This last month has been much better as before that he was down to .231 with no homers lol. September he has found his stroke again. Obviously his playoff performance will have a better indicator of his value but what could I get for him In the offseason?
Also, I want to move Kevin Pillar. He is batting .262 with 4 homers, 19 RBI and 14 steals with his normal top defence. I have Alford and Dwight smith impressing and will likely go to them next year. As for 2b I will look to FA or use the hot Zack Walters full time.
I could deal both as a package or separate. I could also add guys like Jesse Chavez, JA Happ, or Drew Hutchinson for an upgrade. I would be looking for either a nice starter, good pen option or a bat upgrade (to replace Bautista or EE). If that isn't plausible I will just take some decent prospects to rebuild my farm.
This deal would be made during the offseason of course and there haven't been many deals this year so most rosters remain the same. I am looking to make 1 bigger deal or 2 smaller deals this offseason.
Thanks!
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread
This is ludicrous to me.
Odorizzi war 2015- 3.6
Pineda war 2015- 1.7
Cobb was worth 4 wins each of the last two seasons he pitched, his value is at an all time low because of TJ but Pineda has never in his career pitched as well as Alex Cobb.
Smyly has the highest potential of all these guys but is on a 2.8m contract with less team control than Odo and has never produced like Cobb or Odo. He's a better, younger, cheaper, Michael Pineda with more potential.
Odorizzi>Smyly>Pineda>CobbComment
-
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread
What does an A prospect along with Porcello (83ovr 2.60ERA 0.83WHIP) and Sandoval get me in terms of Outfielders? What team would accept a trade like that and for what kind of player.
This trade is really to get rid of Sandoval cuz I need the cap space, but I'm adding an A and a pitcher to just get a decent player in return.
But you let me know please.
ThanksMy teams:
Soccer (It's football, not soccer!!): SL Benfica
Baseball: Oakland A's/ San Francisco Giants
Football: San Francisco 49ersComment
-
Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread
This is ludicrous to me.
Odorizzi war 2015- 3.6
Pineda war 2015- 1.7
Cobb was worth 4 wins each of the last two seasons he pitched, his value is at an all time low because of TJ but Pineda has never in his career pitched as well as Alex Cobb.
Smyly has the highest potential of all these guys but is on a 2.8m contract with less team control than Odo and has never produced like Cobb or Odo. He's a better, younger, cheaper, Michael Pineda with more potential.
Odorizzi>Smyly>Pineda>Cobb
Pineda: SIERA- 3.09 FIP- 3.34 xFIP- 2.95
Odorizi: SIERA- 3.90 FIP- 3.61 xFIP- 3.96
Smyly: SIERA- 3.25 FIP- 3.91 xFIP-3.47
As you can see, Pineda outpreformed both Odorizzi and Smyly in peripherals. The Trop is pretty pitcher friendly, while we all know Yankee Stadium and their short porch is not. I know you're a rays fan, so its hard to separate that, but the basic numbers do lean Pineda as the best of the 3.Comment
Comment