2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
absolutely nothingSteelers | Seminoles | A's | Rockets | Avalanche | Wildcats, Hoosiers | LiverpoolComment
-
Steelers | Seminoles | A's | Rockets | Avalanche | Wildcats, Hoosiers | LiverpoolComment
-
Former modder of "Ultimate Rosters" for MVP Baseball 2005.
Comment
-
"Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
I don't think Halladay would net multiple major league ready players, his age is a dealbreaker. Multiple low minors prospects with good upside makes more sense to me.Bakin' soda, I got bakin' sodaComment
-
Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
I like Rosenthal better than Miller - 96+ as a starter, good control, two improving secondaries... genuine TOR potential, and the same can be said for Miller too.
I don't think Halladay would net multiple major league ready players, his age is a dealbreaker. Multiple low minors prospects with good upside makes more sense to me."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
What do you guys think it will take to get Madison Bumgarner from the Giants???Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Just weighing my options, but what buy-low pitching candidates could I get if my rosters were from the beginning of the season?Comment
-
Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
If A.J. Burnett is still on the Yankees (forget when that happened), him. Ryan Dempster? Rick Porcello? Zack Britton?"Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Burnett's on the Pirates on my roster, and I don't know if I'd want him anyways. Dempster could be a good option, as could Porcello to a lesser extent. Britton would be a good target except he's in my division.Comment
Comment