2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Steelers | Seminoles | A's | Rockets | Avalanche | Wildcats, Hoosiers | LiverpoolComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Red Sox: 2018 World Series Champions!!!
Patriots: 2018 Super Bowl Champions!!!
Team USA
Red Sox
Patriots
Celtics
BruinsComment
-
Red Sox: 2018 World Series Champions!!!
Patriots: 2018 Super Bowl Champions!!!
Team USA
Red Sox
Patriots
Celtics
BruinsComment
-
"Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Red Sox: 2018 World Series Champions!!!
Patriots: 2018 Super Bowl Champions!!!
Team USA
Red Sox
Patriots
Celtics
BruinsComment
-
Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
I like that value... damnit, if the Rangers hadn't signed Pierzynski, I could've given them Arencibia."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
After some trades that we've seen over the past couple of years, I wouldn't call anybody except Trout untouchable so I'll disagree to a point. GM Neal Huntington only spends on prospects anymore though McCutchen is the star and is a top 5 value as far as contract and productivity. You'll have to spend a premium but I bet that he'd do it. He's gotta answer to what few PIT fans there are, so there is one A. His productivity/talent means another A that has to be a premium position (SS or C) plus you'll need a couple of B's (one high, one mid). Then, because of the value of his contract, I'd say another A. So, that's three A's and two B's. I could live with that. That exceeds the Latos trade as it should. If you wait until his final contract year, you could save an A.Comment
-
Comment
Comment