2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • nowitsourtime
    Banned
    • Oct 2011
    • 876

    #751
    Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

    WaitTilNextYear summed up my points and added others in one post. Bravo

    Comment

    • Jakesparrow1008
      Rookie
      • Aug 2012
      • 314

      #752
      Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

      Do you think the Mariners are a good fit for Shaun Marcum? What kinds of players would the Mets want for him if yes?

      Comment

      • nowitsourtime
        Banned
        • Oct 2011
        • 876

        #753
        Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

        Originally posted by Jakesparrow1008
        Do you think the Mariners are a good fit for Shaun Marcum? What kinds of players would the Mets want for him if yes?
        Little bit unrealistic since Marcum just signed a deal with the Mets this past offseason

        Comment

        • Jakesparrow1008
          Rookie
          • Aug 2012
          • 314

          #754
          Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

          I was thinking more for a deadline deal if the Mets were out of contention.

          Comment

          • nowitsourtime
            Banned
            • Oct 2011
            • 876

            #755
            Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

            Originally posted by Jakesparrow1008
            I was thinking more for a deadline deal if the Mets were out of contention.
            Probably an OF like Gutierrez or Saunders or a high C prospect

            Comment

            • hradekbr
              Banned
              • Feb 2013
              • 245

              #756
              Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

              Originally posted by Jakesparrow1008
              Do you think the Mariners are a good fit for Shaun Marcum? What kinds of players would the Mets want for him if yes?
              I don't think the Mariners would want any part of Marcum, especially with all the young pitching they have coming. Marcum has basically competent fallen off last year. I just don't see the fit here.

              Comment

              • Jakesparrow1008
                Rookie
                • Aug 2012
                • 314

                #757
                Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                Originally posted by hradekbr
                I don't think the Mariners would want any part of Marcum, especially with all the young pitching they have coming. Marcum has basically competent fallen off last year. I just don't see the fit here.
                what pitchers do you see the M's targeting?

                Comment

                • TheNumber35
                  Just Bad at Everything
                  • Jan 2012
                  • 2708

                  #758
                  Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                  Originally posted by Jakesparrow1008
                  what pitchers do you see the M's targeting?
                  None. The M's have 3 high ceiling pitching prospects that are all close to the Bigs. There is 0 reason for them to go out and acquire someone via trade considering how highly the think of all 3.
                  Check out my Houston Astros Dynasties:
                  Holdin' Onto Hope- Completed
                  Holdin' Onto Hope Part 2: Cranes, Trains, and Auto-Explosions- Completed

                  Comment

                  • Jakesparrow1008
                    Rookie
                    • Aug 2012
                    • 314

                    #759
                    Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                    Originally posted by TheNumber35
                    None. The M's have 3 high ceiling pitching prospects that are all close to the Bigs. There is 0 reason for them to go out and acquire someone via trade considering how highly the think of all 3.
                    so i should be looking for infield help and offense?

                    Comment

                    • AC
                      Win the East
                      • Sep 2010
                      • 14951

                      #760
                      Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                      Originally posted by TheNumber35
                      None. The M's have 3 high ceiling pitching prospects that are all close to the Bigs. There is 0 reason for them to go out and acquire someone via trade considering how highly the think of all 3.
                      Paxton isn't exactly a lock and Maurer isn't really that close, so I think that they could get *one* guy
                      "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                      Comment

                      • TheNumber35
                        Just Bad at Everything
                        • Jan 2012
                        • 2708

                        #761
                        Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                        Originally posted by ACMilan99
                        Paxton isn't exactly a lock and Maurer isn't really that close, so I think that they could get *one* guy
                        But Marcum isn't a guy that I view as a good enough upgrade to be worthy of dealing for him haha. I could see Marcum being dealt, but I don't see him as an appealing candidate to acquire. I mean that's all opinion...but Marcum is a marginal upgrade over the 4 guys in Seattle's rotation not named Felix. They would be better off signing Lohse or going after someone else.
                        Check out my Houston Astros Dynasties:
                        Holdin' Onto Hope- Completed
                        Holdin' Onto Hope Part 2: Cranes, Trains, and Auto-Explosions- Completed

                        Comment

                        • AC
                          Win the East
                          • Sep 2010
                          • 14951

                          #762
                          Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                          Originally posted by TheNumber35
                          But Marcum isn't a guy that I view as a good enough upgrade to be worthy of dealing for him haha. I could see Marcum being dealt, but I don't see him as an appealing candidate to acquire. I mean that's all opinion...but Marcum is a marginal upgrade over the 4 guys in Seattle's rotation not named Felix. They would be better off signing Lohse or going after someone else.
                          Yeah, I could see that. I doubt the Mets deal Marcum in any case, though.
                          "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                          Comment

                          • CameRoN0407
                            It's a New England Thing
                            • Oct 2012
                            • 3328

                            #763
                            Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                            How much would it take to get one of the Mariners pitching prospects. Pedroia and Bogaerts are the only off limits for me...
                            Red Sox: 2018 World Series Champions!!!
                            Patriots: 2018 Super Bowl Champions!!!

                            Team USA
                            Red Sox
                            Patriots
                            Celtics
                            Bruins

                            Comment

                            • BBallcoach
                              MVP
                              • Dec 2012
                              • 1524

                              #764
                              Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                              Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
                              OK, so I think the fact that the board is so split on this Halladay for Markakis and Matusz trade actually tells me it must be a pretty good deal, since smart amateur baseball people on both sides can see the merits. But count me in favor of Baltimore would ABSOLUTELY consider trading Markakis for Halladay.

                              And here's why...

                              What is common in all World Series Champions lately? If you said strong starting pitching, you'd be cliche, but also correct. We can think of the Giants/Cardinals/Yankees/Phillies/Red Sox as teams who have won recently. Guess what all of those have in common? Strong starting pitching and a legitimate ACE. Whether you're talking about Cain, Bumgarner, Wainwright, Hamels, Sabathia, Schilling, Beckett--you're talking about top aces that can win any given playoff game.

                              The Orioles currently don't have an ace. Certainly they have some great depth, but nothing even resembling an ace, not yet anyway.

                              But, Roy Halladay could be an ace for another 2-3 years yet if he can get/stay healthy. Even in a bad year for him last year, he still posted numbers that would have put him as Baltimore's 2nd starter. In fact, even though he was hurt last year, Halladay pitched more innings (156) than anyone on BAL's staff aside from Wei-Yin Chen. Last season was the first time since 2005 that 2-time Cy Young winner Roy Halladay did not pitch 200+ innings in a season. He's been consistently at 220-250 IP for half a decade now. If you removed the name and just looked at K/9 = 7.6, K/BB = 3.76 W-L 11-8, 4.49 ERA, 1.22 WHIP you might think, hey this guy is pretty good. And then if you consider he's been an 8+ WAR pitcher (!!!!) 2 of the past 3 seasons in a pitcher's park, you'd really be stoked. And this doesn't even count how awesome it would be for the young pitchers like Dylan Bundy to learn from a guy like Roy Halladay.

                              35 is old for some players, but scores of pitchers have pitched to 40 and been effective. Just look at Maddux or Mussina or Fergie Jenkins or Schilling or Randy Johnson or Andy Pettitte or John Smoltz...to infinity. I actually think Halladay has shown incredible durability in his career and his tall, strong frame is the type that ages particularly well.

                              And you can't tell me that the Orioles trotting Roy Halladay out there for Game 1 of a playoff series wouldn't geek up the fans and sike out the opposing team moreso than Miguel Gonzalez or Chris Tillman or Wei-Yin Chen or Jason Hammel? Seriously? Halladay has a 2.37 ERA and 0.74 WHIP in 38 playoff innings. Baltimore's current starting rotation doesn't have 38 playoff IP combined.

                              And this analysis doesn't really try to tear Markakis down either to prove a point. He's a solid player that people are simply overrating (1.5-2.0ish WAR, hovering around 0.800 OPS lately). As a matter of fact, Markakis ranked tied with Manny Machado (who played half as many games) for 4th on the Orioles in WAR for position players in 2012. Adam Jones, Matt Wieters, and J.J. Hardy all had WARs at least 2x higher. And Chris Davis even had a 1.3 WAR. So, the whole "Markakis is the best (or one of the top 2-3) hitters on the O's" argument is quite a stretch at best. I think Markakis, in 2013, is realistically the 4th or 5th most valuable position player on the O's after Jones, Wieters, Machado, and maybe Hardy (lower if Brian Roberts comes back strong).
                              Ok, but like all sports it's a what have you done lately... you guys act like The young halladay is coming back... he's not. WAR is not the end all stat. I'm sorry but the O's aren't going to trade a 29 year old Markakis (who doesn't turn 30 til november) for a 35 year old Halladay (turns 36 in may) and is on a decline. He isn't a number one anymore and if he pitches like last year he's a an ok #2. It's not that you can get more for markakis, it's he means more to that club. He's one of it's best hitters (only Jones is better), very good defensively and he is one of their team leaders. No team in their right mind would trade that valuable of a player to their team to for a pitcher who is on the decline, 6.5 years older, coming off an injury and not showing signs of getting it back to where it was.
                              Not only would it be a bad move, it's an atrocious one. This isn't halladay from 2 years ago. It's a new day, can't live in the past.
                              Beavers|Red Sox|Buccaneers|NBA Hoops

                              Comment

                              • tyloraw
                                Just started!
                                • Mar 2013
                                • 7

                                #765
                                Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                                About the second month of the season as the Giants, I was struggling for a good left handed reliever because Javi Lopez just wasn't cutting it. (5.45 or so ERA, giving up HRs to both sides, etc) And so I ended up trading him and another right handed reliever, I think it was Kontos, to Detroit for Smyly and Albuquerque.

                                Not sure why they agreed, felt like a steal to me, but I got them locked up. Started out Using Smyly as a spot starter/long Reliever and Albuquerque as set up man with Casilla. I'm thinking this was a pretty damn good trade but honestly there may be something I'm over looking. But funny enough, mid season, trained Smyly in Stamina and now he's my Fourth. (Cause damn Vogelsong is -3 in every stat and went 1-7.)

                                Thinking I came out alright on that one.

                                Comment

                                Working...