MLB Off-Topic

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Blzer
    Resident film pundit
    • Mar 2004
    • 42509

    #4786
    Re: MLB Off-Topic

    Originally posted by dickey1331
    I didn't know about this

    [ATTACH]120826[/ATTACH]
    Samsung PN60F8500 PDP / Anthem MRX 720 / Klipsch RC-62 II / Klipsch RF-82 II (x2) / Insignia NS-B2111 (x2) / SVS PC13-Ultra / SVS SB-2000 / Sony MDR-7506 Professional / Audio-Technica ATH-R70x / Sony PS3 & PS4 / DirecTV HR44-500 / DarbeeVision DVP-5000 / Panamax M5400-PM / Elgato HD60

    Comment

    • kmoser
      MVP
      • Jul 2012
      • 1398

      #4787
      Re: MLB Off-Topic

      Alright guys this is random so I thought this would be the right thread for this question, hopefully lol.
      I've been doing some research on the knuckleball lately and I've found that pretty much all knuckleball pitchers use it exclusively as their #1 pitch, and they'll throw a few other pitches like a fastball and a change sometimes as well. Also, it's very rare when a pitcher can master it like Dickey, Wakefield, and now Wright. And from what I've experienced in my time watching baseball I've noticed that most knuckleballers don't have much velocity on their fastballs. So this got me thinking, what if a flamethrower, like say Syndergaard or maybe even a reliever like Chapman, mastered the knuckleball and had it in their repertoire? I feel like this change of speed would be devastating for batters and have never seen anyone with high velocity throw the pitch. I'm not saying it has to be those guys specifically but it would be cool if a guy could hit 95+ with their fastball and then toss a low to mid 70s knuckle the next pitch.
      I'm sure it's a lot more complicated and harder to do than I'm making it out to be but it was a late night thought that crossed my mind and I wanted to see what you guys thought or anything you guys know lol. Would this even be possible?



      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

      Comment

      • Blzer
        Resident film pundit
        • Mar 2004
        • 42509

        #4788
        Re: MLB Off-Topic

        I'm sure somebody else could answer this better than I can, but I'll give it a go.

        If they threw a knuckleball, they would tip their pitch before it released their hand. The difference is exactly as you said: Steven Wright and others are knuckleball first, so they can make their fastball appear as if they were going to throw a knuckleball initially. Probably also why they don't throw quite as hard.

        Now, you might argue that the knuckleball is devastating enough anyway regardless of the hitter knowing about it. Sure, that's true. Now we have to get them to perfect the pitch. Why? What is a knuckleball that has spin? A batting practice hanger. There are many reasons why there are so few knuckleballers in the game, and besides the obvious that most people consider it a pitch type that is just "goofing around" and they more than likely didn't come up their baseball careers that way (as is the case with submarine pitchers as well), you have to be 99% efficient with it, or you are not doing your job as a pitcher. I throw knuckleballs here and there, but every other throw has tons of spin and is crap. They just don't have that pitch in their repertoire.

        Also, I know you didn't ask this, but how effective might a 90 MPH knuckleball be? Probably not as effective. It wouldn't get as much "wiggle" as it could at 75 MPH, although movement would at that point be pretty drastic but it won't be effective for only 60.5 feet. You also need catchers to be able to hang onto most of these. I get where your head is at, but it is a difficult pitch to master. Even if Syndergaard got the knuckling down, he probably wouldn't be able to command it worth a damn.
        Samsung PN60F8500 PDP / Anthem MRX 720 / Klipsch RC-62 II / Klipsch RF-82 II (x2) / Insignia NS-B2111 (x2) / SVS PC13-Ultra / SVS SB-2000 / Sony MDR-7506 Professional / Audio-Technica ATH-R70x / Sony PS3 & PS4 / DirecTV HR44-500 / DarbeeVision DVP-5000 / Panamax M5400-PM / Elgato HD60

        Comment

        • slickdtc
          Grayscale
          • Aug 2004
          • 17125

          #4789
          Re: MLB Off-Topic

          Not the same, but Kershaw has thrown some eephus pitches. Accomplishes a similar extreme off-speed, strange trajectory but without tipping your pitch as it releases.
          NHL - Philadelphia Flyers
          NFL - Buffalo Bills
          MLB - Cincinnati Reds


          Originally posted by Money99
          And how does one levy a check that will result in only a slight concussion? Do they set their shoulder-pads to 'stun'?

          Comment

          • Jr.
            Playgirl Coverboy
            • Feb 2003
            • 19171

            #4790
            Re: MLB Off-Topic

            Originally posted by kmoser
            Alright guys this is random so I thought this would be the right thread for this question, hopefully lol.
            I've been doing some research on the knuckleball lately and I've found that pretty much all knuckleball pitchers use it exclusively as their #1 pitch, and they'll throw a few other pitches like a fastball and a change sometimes as well. Also, it's very rare when a pitcher can master it like Dickey, Wakefield, and now Wright. And from what I've experienced in my time watching baseball I've noticed that most knuckleballers don't have much velocity on their fastballs. So this got me thinking, what if a flamethrower, like say Syndergaard or maybe even a reliever like Chapman, mastered the knuckleball and had it in their repertoire? I feel like this change of speed would be devastating for batters and have never seen anyone with high velocity throw the pitch. I'm not saying it has to be those guys specifically but it would be cool if a guy could hit 95+ with their fastball and then toss a low to mid 70s knuckle the next pitch.
            I'm sure it's a lot more complicated and harder to do than I'm making it out to be but it was a late night thought that crossed my mind and I wanted to see what you guys thought or anything you guys know lol. Would this even be possible?



            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
            I think knuckleballs at high speeds aren't as effective because the seams don't have enough time to catch the air and tumble. Dickey threw his in the low-mid 70s if I recall correctly, and I think that's about the top end of an effective knuckleball.

            For a guy throwing in the mid-upper 90s, that knuckleball would likely be in the 80s, which I think is too hard to get the type of movement you associate with a knuckleball. You also tend to push a knuckleball, with the elbow a bit lower in your arm action, so I don't know if a high velocity guy could even physically throw an effective knuckleball without completely changing their mechanics.
            My favorite teams are better than your favorite teams

            Watch me play video games

            Comment

            • kehlis
              Moderator
              • Jul 2008
              • 27738

              #4791
              Re: MLB Off-Topic

              Yea the biggest problem would be that it would easily be tipped which takes away from what makes some of the best pitchers great.

              Comment

              • Chip Douglass
                Hall Of Fame
                • Dec 2005
                • 12256

                #4792
                Re: MLB Off-Topic

                Human ball-and-chain Carl Crawford designated for assignment; still due $35 million from the Dodgers until 2017.

                Hard to do better (worse?) in terms of mid-career collapses than him.
                I write things on the Internet.

                Comment

                • SPTO
                  binging
                  • Feb 2003
                  • 68046

                  #4793
                  Re: MLB Off-Topic

                  Anybody in the Cleveland area/big fans of the Indians have any insight on something I read this morning? Apparently in Nick Cafardo's latest column he put in an item saying according to industry sources as long as the Dolans own the Indians that the team won't ever move but if they should ever sell the club all bets are off. It seems like the Indians, save for that big run in the '90s can't seem to draw much.

                  Are there actually rumblings on sports radio or anywhere talking about all this?
                  Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club

                  "Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. Parker

                  Comment

                  • Themayorofawsometown
                    Pro
                    • Sep 2015
                    • 1101

                    #4794
                    Re: MLB Off-Topic

                    The reason the Indians can't draw is because they've been bad. That start to put it together and the crowds will follow

                    Sent from my N9130 using Tapatalk
                    Xbox gt:Th3TurdBurgl4rs
                    NY Jets
                    NY Yankees
                    Miami Heat

                    Comment

                    • Perfect Zero
                      1B, OF
                      • Jun 2005
                      • 4012

                      #4795
                      Re: MLB Off-Topic

                      Originally posted by SPTO
                      Anybody in the Cleveland area/big fans of the Indians have any insight on something I read this morning? Apparently in Nick Cafardo's latest column he put in an item saying according to industry sources as long as the Dolans own the Indians that the team won't ever move but if they should ever sell the club all bets are off. It seems like the Indians, save for that big run in the '90s can't seem to draw much.

                      Are there actually rumblings on sports radio or anywhere talking about all this?
                      The Indians have always been in this position. My Dad tells me that when he was a kid in the 60's, Arlington was close to bringing them here. Weren't they close to moving to Tampa before the Rays?
                      Rangers - Cowboys - Aggies - Stars - Mavericks

                      Comment

                      • SPTO
                        binging
                        • Feb 2003
                        • 68046

                        #4796
                        Re: MLB Off-Topic

                        Originally posted by Perfect Zero
                        The Indians have always been in this position. My Dad tells me that when he was a kid in the 60's, Arlington was close to bringing them here. Weren't they close to moving to Tampa before the Rays?
                        I've heard that it was the Giants that were in a position to move to Tampa and that got the city to pony up for the current ballpark.
                        Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club

                        "Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. Parker

                        Comment

                        • Sportsforever
                          NL MVP
                          • Mar 2005
                          • 20368

                          #4797
                          Re: MLB Off-Topic

                          Originally posted by Chip Douglass
                          Human ball-and-chain Carl Crawford designated for assignment; still due $35 million from the Dodgers until 2017.

                          Hard to do better (worse?) in terms of mid-career collapses than him.
                          Injuries really did him in...prior to all his injuries (and it's a long list) I think you could argue he was one of the top 5 position players in the game in 2009/2010.
                          "People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring." - Rogers Hornsby

                          Comment

                          • kmoser
                            MVP
                            • Jul 2012
                            • 1398

                            #4798
                            Re: MLB Off-Topic

                            Originally posted by Jr.
                            I think knuckleballs at high speeds aren't as effective because the seams don't have enough time to catch the air and tumble. Dickey threw his in the low-mid 70s if I recall correctly, and I think that's about the top end of an effective knuckleball.

                            For a guy throwing in the mid-upper 90s, that knuckleball would likely be in the 80s, which I think is too hard to get the type of movement you associate with a knuckleball. You also tend to push a knuckleball, with the elbow a bit lower in your arm action, so I don't know if a high velocity guy could even physically throw an effective knuckleball without completely changing their mechanics.


                            Yeah this makes a lot of sense, it would be pretty neat if someone could throw a good knuckler while also have a plus speed fast ball, but like you guys said, would be very hard and maybe not possible. That thought had me wondering so thanks for the responses!

                            Comment

                            • Perfect Zero
                              1B, OF
                              • Jun 2005
                              • 4012

                              #4799
                              Re: MLB Off-Topic

                              Originally posted by SPTO
                              I've heard that it was the Giants that were in a position to move to Tampa and that got the city to pony up for the current ballpark.
                              Everybody was wanting to move to Tampa. The Giants and White Sox come to mind; I might be wrong about the Indians. I know former Arlington Mayor Richard Greene said that the Rangers were eying Tampa before getting the Ballpark in Arlington.
                              Rangers - Cowboys - Aggies - Stars - Mavericks

                              Comment

                              • DieHardYankee26
                                BING BONG
                                • Feb 2008
                                • 10178

                                #4800
                                Re: MLB Off-Topic



                                Don't remember how I got here, I think it was from an article on The Ringer (now that I think about it, it was, but in an article about why the Raiders can't get a new stadium ironically) , but it's a great article on the territorial rights in the Bay and the history of them. We'd talked a little about that not too long ago, but I found it pretty comprehensive. Interesting that the Giants stadium was paid for solely by investors, why is that so rare now? Is it because it's been shown that cities will pay that owners just know they'll cave?

                                Hard to argue against Magowan in that he paid for a team that came with territorial rights so he has no need go give them up, but it's unfortunate I guess. Especially for a team with such history out there. It seems though that part of his argument is that there's a part of where the A's want to move that funnels right into Giants territory because of the rights and that makes sense 100% and I guess explains why they can't come up with a Orioles/Nationals solution with split TV rights.
                                Originally posted by G Perico
                                If I ain't got it, then I gotta take it
                                I can't hide who I am, baby I'm a gangster
                                In the Rolls Royce, steppin' on a mink rug
                                The clique just a gang of bosses that linked up

                                Comment

                                Working...