MLB Off-Topic

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JayBee74
    Hall Of Fame
    • Jul 2002
    • 22989

    #676
    re: MLB Off-Topic

    Originally posted by NYJets
    Maybe there hasn't been a face of baseball the last 15 sports, I don't know, it's subjective, and baseball's different than golf or boxing that are individual sports, and basketball that is dominated by stars. But if there was one it was certainly him.
    If you mean 15 years, I would agree with that.

    Comment

    • JayBee74
      Hall Of Fame
      • Jul 2002
      • 22989

      #677
      re: MLB Off-Topic

      Originally posted by DrJones
      Two thumbs up to Derek Jeter, the baseball player.

      Two middle fingers raised to Derek Jeter, the cult.
      Yeah, Class guy, excellent player.

      Comment

      • TheMatrix31
        RF
        • Jul 2002
        • 52898

        #678
        re: MLB Off-Topic

        The best player on the planet right now is Mike Trout.

        Once he starts to accumulate postseason success, he will also become a figure that transcends the sport.

        Comment

        • slickdtc
          Grayscale
          • Aug 2004
          • 17125

          #679
          re: MLB Off-Topic

          That's why there might not be another Jeter for a long time. Someone nailed it; he was never THE best player in the sport, but he won all those WS with signature moments included. Another guy has to be lucky enough to get to all those WS and be a really good player and have those big moments to become the face of baseball like Jeter has been.

          That's a lot of stuff aligning just perfectly. But Trout is best positioned to take over, based on talent and the Angels finally becoming a good team again with all that money invested in their players.
          NHL - Philadelphia Flyers
          NFL - Buffalo Bills
          MLB - Cincinnati Reds


          Originally posted by Money99
          And how does one levy a check that will result in only a slight concussion? Do they set their shoulder-pads to 'stun'?

          Comment

          • AC
            Win the East
            • Sep 2010
            • 14951

            #680
            re: MLB Off-Topic

            Is Derek Jeter the face of baseball? Probably. Is he overrated? Again, probably. I respect his contributions and certainly enjoyed watching him (for the most part, lol), but I do feel like the love got a little outrageous sometimes. He belongs in the HOF no question and he was a fantastic player, but he's not an all-time great.
            "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

            Comment

            • DrJones
              All Star
              • Mar 2003
              • 9107

              #681
              re: MLB Off-Topic

              Originally posted by TheMatrix31
              The best player on the planet right now is Mike Trout.

              Once he starts to accumulate postseason success with the Yankees or Red Sox, he will also become a figure that transcends the sport.
              Fixed that for ya.
              Originally posted by Thrash13
              Dr. Jones was right in stating that. We should have believed him.
              Originally posted by slickdtc
              DrJones brings the stinky cheese is what we've all learned from this debacle.
              Originally posted by Kipnis22
              yes your fantasy world when your proven wrong about 95% of your post

              Comment

              • JayBee74
                Hall Of Fame
                • Jul 2002
                • 22989

                #682
                re: MLB Off-Topic

                Originally posted by AC
                Is Derek Jeter the face of baseball? Probably. Is he overrated? Again, probably. I respect his contributions and certainly enjoyed watching him (for the most part, lol), but I do feel like the love got a little outrageous sometimes. He belongs in the HOF no question and he was a fantastic player, but he's not an all-time great.

                I've conceded I'm impressed by his Q-Rating, but I won't concede he's the face of baseball.


                ONE World Championship in the last 14 years? Is the "face of baseball" thing mostly New York hype?

                Comment

                • PhilliesFan13
                  Banned
                  • May 2009
                  • 15651

                  #683
                  re: MLB Off-Topic

                  Diamondbacks fired Kirk Gibson and Alan Trammell.

                  Trammell will manage the final 3 games though. Weird.

                  Comment

                  • DrJones
                    All Star
                    • Mar 2003
                    • 9107

                    #684
                    re: MLB Off-Topic

                    Originally posted by AC
                    Is Derek Jeter the face of baseball? Probably. Is he overrated? Again, probably. I respect his contributions and certainly enjoyed watching him (for the most part, lol), but I do feel like the love got a little outrageous sometimes. He belongs in the HOF no question and he was a fantastic player, but he's not an all-time great.
                    Depends how one defines "all-time great", I suppose. If anything, his consistent offensive production has been slightly underrated over the years.
                    Originally posted by Thrash13
                    Dr. Jones was right in stating that. We should have believed him.
                    Originally posted by slickdtc
                    DrJones brings the stinky cheese is what we've all learned from this debacle.
                    Originally posted by Kipnis22
                    yes your fantasy world when your proven wrong about 95% of your post

                    Comment

                    • DamnYanks2
                      Hall Of Fame
                      • Jun 2007
                      • 20794

                      #685
                      re: MLB Off-Topic

                      Originally posted by JayBee74
                      I've conceded I'm impressed by his Q-Rating, but I won't concede he's the face of baseball.


                      ONE World Championship in the last 14 years? Is the "face of baseball" thing mostly New York hype?
                      You mean two? 2000 and 2009 champs.

                      Saying he's the face of baseball doesn't mean he's the best, it means he's one of the the most recognizable faces in the game. You ask people on the streets who Jeter is, most people would be familiar with his name, not the case with Miggy, Trout, Kershaw, Cutch etc.. Jeter is a household name, like Kobe, Jordan, Lebron, Peyton Manning etc.

                      Comment

                      • AC
                        Win the East
                        • Sep 2010
                        • 14951

                        #686
                        re: MLB Off-Topic

                        Originally posted by DrJones
                        Depends how one defines "all-time great", I suppose. If anything, his consistent offensive production has been slightly underrated over the years.
                        Makes up for the public opinion of his defense, lol.
                        "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                        Comment

                        • DrJones
                          All Star
                          • Mar 2003
                          • 9107

                          #687
                          re: MLB Off-Topic

                          Originally posted by JayBee74
                          Is the "face of baseball" thing mostly New York hype?
                          To a large degree, yes. If Jeter played the majority of his career as a Cardinal and Pujols as a Yankee, Jeter would not be called "the face of baseball".
                          Originally posted by Thrash13
                          Dr. Jones was right in stating that. We should have believed him.
                          Originally posted by slickdtc
                          DrJones brings the stinky cheese is what we've all learned from this debacle.
                          Originally posted by Kipnis22
                          yes your fantasy world when your proven wrong about 95% of your post

                          Comment

                          • JayBee74
                            Hall Of Fame
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 22989

                            #688
                            re: MLB Off-Topic

                            Originally posted by DamnYanks2
                            You mean two? 2000 and 2009 champs.

                            No, I meant one. One championship (2009) from 2001-2014 (14 years).

                            Comment

                            • DamnYanks2
                              Hall Of Fame
                              • Jun 2007
                              • 20794

                              #689
                              re: MLB Off-Topic

                              Originally posted by JayBee74
                              No, I meant one. One championship (2009) from 2001-2014 (14 years).
                              I wasn't counting 2014, seeing as we don't have a WS winner yet, but I guess it's all moot, since the Yankees are out of it this year, still it's not a stretch at all too say 2 titles in 15 years. Nobody has more then 3 in the last 15 years. Not to mention two other WS appearances, that were thwarted by the D'Backs and Marlins of course, I'm just saying that's pretty damn good, Homer or not.

                              Comment

                              • AC
                                Win the East
                                • Sep 2010
                                • 14951

                                #690
                                re: MLB Off-Topic

                                This is why arbitrary start and end dates are bad
                                "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                                Comment

                                Working...