Help me out.
The Rockets picked up Stromile Swift and everybody thinks it's a good signing.
The Lakers picked up Kwame Brown and they get ripped for it.
Stromile Swift #2 overall pick in 2000
00-01 4.9 PPG 3.6 RPG 16.4 MPG
01-02 11.8 PPG 6.3 RPG 26.5 MPG
02-03 9.7 PPG 5.7 RPG 22.1 MPG
03-04 9.4 PPG 4.9 RPG 19.8 MPG
04-05 10.1 PPG 4.6 RPG 21.3 MPG
Career 9.0 PPG 5.0 RPG 21 MPG
Kwame Brown #1 overall pick in 2001
01-02 4.5 PPG 3.5 RPG 14.3 MPG
02-03 7.4 PPG 5.3 RPG 22.2 MPG
03-04 10.9 PPG 7.4 RPG 30.3 MPG
04-05 7.0 PPG 4.9 RPG 21.6 MPG
Career 7.7 PPG 5.50 RPG 20 MPG
They are basically the same player. Swift averages a little more points, but Kwame averages a little more rebounds in roughly the same amount of minutes. Only difference is Swift played a year of college and came into the NBA a year earlier. Kwame came into the NBA straight out of HS.
Kwame was #1 overall and he's considered a bust and won't do anything with LA, Swift was #2 overall (a year earlier) and his NBA performance is equal to that of Kwame's but he's gonna help the Rockets??
I even saw in the Kwame Brown/Wilbon thread, someone said that the Lakers should have went after Swift. Why? How is he better than Kwame??
Explain this to me?

Comment