</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
I don't really fault him.
I fault the media, and therfore associate him, being "bad", because of the overhyping BS the media tends to push upon him.
I guess its just reality.
i really think he can be one of the best, but if he honestly wants the title of the best, he'll have to prove it along side the worst and build up.
Stu Lantz(sp?) and that southerland dude need to get off the Lakers Balls ASAP. It's saddening trying to watch a full laker game on league pass.
Real Life "Bad Laker D" = Their opinions "Extremely good luck by other team"
Real Life "Good offense by other team"- Their opinions "Defensive lapse in their mindset"
They can't OUTRIGHT give props to the other team or talk some SH** about the bad play of the lakers. Their always associating the mistakes and good plays of the other teams with luck, and terrible defense.
Why can't you say, there just better, or they played better, or they were there on time and executed the play well with good laker D.
I'm sure other teams commentators do this, but with the LA popularity around the world, and kobe Bryant, I wanna see 7 foot white guys get schooled by Shaq.
it's hard to not notice their extreme biasm.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
More BS....
The Media didnt help Kobe average 30 a game. The Media didnt give Kobe his 3 rings. So stop with that media overhype BS. If a guy averages 30 and gets 3 rings, he deserves the hype. They would do the same for TMAC or Iverson if they had championships.
Also, ALL local commentators are homers and cheer for their home team. I watch nearly every Laker game on League Pass and Stu Lantz is as quick to criticize the team as anybody else. You are clearly biased.
Comment