****2012 NBA FINALS DISCUSSION THREAD****

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wwharton
    *ll St*r
    • Aug 2002
    • 26949

    #2116
    Re: ****2012 NBA FINALS DISCUSSION THREAD****

    Originally posted by King_B_Mack
    I don't know, I just know I hate hearing about that ALL THE TIME. We always have to hear the experience angle with games like these. LeBron I would say is not a good example. Last year wasn't LeBron's first Finals. By the experience logic that we all bring out, LeBron should've dominated last year because he'd been there before. The difference in play between this year and last year isn't so much experience of what to expect and how to deal with adversity in the Finals, it's LeBron trying to get people off his *** about not winning. The experience thing is played up way too much.
    You're trying to make it too black and white. It's not a video game with an attribute assigned to "finals experience". You have to go deeper to really suggest any effects (which you wouldn't do if you're completely writing it off, of course). Sticking with Lebron, there is no argument that the pressure of this final is MUCH different than before. Add to that, the attempt to play off Wade, quiet the critics, take the "last shot" just bc or other media created crap has a pressure that would just naturally increase on the grandest stage. Kind of OT but the idea that James is playing different to get people off his *** is a bigger pile of crap actually. That's not one of those things you just DECIDE to do, lol. If that's a general way of saying, "He's taking a more serious approach, is learning how to be more active without dominating the ball, focusing more on getting the ball in great scoring position, and not letting outside chatter effect his play." then ok. But just that general statement... nah.

    It's not just a random concept though. There's a reason teams with more seniors are predicted to do better in the playoffs on the college and high school level... teams that routinely make it so far on those levels generally continue to go far more consistently than up and comers. Hell, there's a reason you'd rather have a surgeon who's been practicing for 20 years than the top student in the country who's only fresh out of med school. Unsettled nerves certainly play a role in all walks of life. You can call BS on any claims that they caused a team to win or lose, but they definitely play their role on these guys.

    Comment

    • NINJAK2
      *S *dd*ct
      • Jan 2003
      • 6185

      #2117
      Re: ****2012 NBA FINALS DISCUSSION THREAD****

      Originally posted by jeebs9
      I can't take when people get mad at refs. I don't think it's hard to say that The Heat were the better team tonight.



      Sent from my DROID X2 using Tapatalk 2

      Refs are bad. Have been bad and will continue to be bad. They usually play some role partially in the outcome of games therefore they will continue to be a topic. Given that the NBA is really the only sport where fans have routinely complained about inconsistent officiating for years it's really time to shake that area of the game up imo. Not saying they are the sole reason for every game's outcome but they play a huge role in player rotations, pace, and flow do to inaccurate/quick/non-existent whistles.

      Wade has really become annoying with his constant whining and/or staring at the refs at every missed shot of his. Very pathetic. IMO if the Heat lose this series Wade takes a bigger PR hit than LBJ imo.
      Last edited by NINJAK2; 06-18-2012, 09:56 PM.
      EA and 2k have the unfortunate task of trying to balance on a tightrope of fun and sim while trying not to fall 10,000 feet to their death. Instead of a safety net waiting down below there will just be angry customers quick to move out of the way and talk of their failure.

      Comment

      • BringTheHeat
        MVP
        • Jan 2012
        • 2264

        #2118
        Re: ****2012 NBA FINALS DISCUSSION THREAD****

        Originally posted by NINJAK2
        Given that the NBA is really the only sport where fans have routinely complained about inconsistent officiating for years it's really time to shake that area of the game up imo.
        The national media has you twisted in the mind man. OK fans complain about officiating every time they lose. I'm sure some people who live in Texas can confirm, but OU football fans are the WORST. It's really no surprise the Thunder fans (who are also mostly OU fans) complain about officials every time they lose, never say a word when they win.
        "To the last minute, to the last second, to the last man, we fight"

        Comment

        • iLLosophy
          Plata o Plomo
          • Sep 2005
          • 3673

          #2119
          Re: ****2012 NBA FINALS DISCUSSION THREAD****

          Originally posted by NINJAK2
          Refs are bad. Have been bad and will continue to be bad. They usually play a role in the outcome of games therefore they will continue to be a topic. Given that the NBA is really the only sport where fans have routinely complained about inconsistent officiating for years it's really time to shake that area of the game up imo. Not saying they were they are the sole reason for every game but they play a huge role in player rotations, pace, and flow do to inaccurate/quick/non-existent whistles.

          Wade has really become annoying with his constant whining and/or staring at the refs at every missed shot of his. Very pathetic. IMO if the Heat lose this series Wade takes a bigger PR hit than LBJ imo.
          Think there might be a number of factors
          1) The League is at its most "touchiest" standard ever - meaning there were a lot of things that Refs didn't have to watch for 10,20,30,50 years ago, that they have to watch for now. And not only they have to watch for them, but they have to categorize it in real time. Safe to say the job for a NBA ref is the most difficult that it has ever been. They might just need more eyes on the court, and honestly there's a lot of things that I think could be eventually automated once the technology is there (e.g. def 3 seconds). But until that happens I honestly think they can use one more ref out there.
          2) I think there is a narrative coming down from the league office that is told to the refs but isn't told to us. Harden got a lot of flop calls in the first two rounds, and now he's not getting any. We all can speculate why, but I do think it's not a coincidence that it happened the same time an article is published saying the NBA is looking into flopping. Thus some of the inconsistencies we see.

          Comment

          • wwharton
            *ll St*r
            • Aug 2002
            • 26949

            #2120
            Re: ****2012 NBA FINALS DISCUSSION THREAD****

            Originally posted by NINJAK2
            Refs are bad. Have been bad and will continue to be bad. They usually play a role in the outcome of games therefore they will continue to be a topic. Given that the NBA is really the only sport where fans have routinely complained about inconsistent officiating for years it's really time to shake that area of the game up imo. Not saying they were they are the sole reason for every game but they play a huge role in player rotations, pace, and flow do to inaccurate/quick/non-existent whistles.

            Wade has really become annoying with his constant whining and/or staring at the refs at every missed shot of his. Very pathetic. IMO if the Heat lose this series Wade takes a bigger PR hit than LBJ imo.
            There are more complaints with the NBA bc NBA refs have the hardest jobs.

            1. If they call every infraction by the book, we would absolutely hate the product.
            2. There's more nonstop action than other sports.
            3. Players try to take advantage of how hard the job is by acting like they're fouled even when they're not.

            We really shouldn't be expecting a perfectly called game... ever. Refs are part of the game, that's just how it is. It's hard to accept so you can't help but get mad at calls that look obvious. But at the end of the day, something could probably be called every single time down the court. A travel, reaching call, hand on the back of the post player, moving screens, holds on box outs, etc. We really don't want perfect refs.

            Comment

            • 23
              yellow
              • Sep 2002
              • 66469

              #2121
              Re: ****2012 NBA FINALS DISCUSSION THREAD****

              Its consistency that people are asking for not perfection

              If its that bad, use more refs

              Why is it always the same guy in all the big games

              ...and most of the time that guy is an agressive whistler ie Dick Bavetta, Joey Crawford, Bennett Salvatore

              It makes no sense to continue to say its hard if the league wont rectify the issue and thats the key. Dress code, headbands, twitter... but not really get into the meat and potatos of one of the things that make people question the integrity of your league more than ever.

              Comment

              • NINJAK2
                *S *dd*ct
                • Jan 2003
                • 6185

                #2122
                Re: ****2012 NBA FINALS DISCUSSION THREAD****

                Originally posted by BringTheHeat
                The national media has you twisted in the mind man. OK fans complain about officiating every time they lose. I'm sure some people who live in Texas can confirm, but OU football fans are the WORST. It's really no surprise the Thunder fans (who are also mostly OU fans) complain about officials every time they lose, never say a word when they win.
                Dude. I can think for myself. I'm not an OU fan (check my 76er avatar)and I don't let the media tell me what to think. I've been complaining about officiating for years in the NBA. Think what you want..
                EA and 2k have the unfortunate task of trying to balance on a tightrope of fun and sim while trying not to fall 10,000 feet to their death. Instead of a safety net waiting down below there will just be angry customers quick to move out of the way and talk of their failure.

                Comment

                • wwharton
                  *ll St*r
                  • Aug 2002
                  • 26949

                  #2123
                  Re: ****2012 NBA FINALS DISCUSSION THREAD****

                  Originally posted by 23
                  Its consistency that people are asking for not perfection

                  If its that bad, use more refs

                  Why is it always the same guy in all the big games

                  ...and most of the time that guy is an agressive whistler ie Dick Bavetta, Joey Crawford, Bennett Salvatore

                  It makes no sense to continue to say its hard if the league wont rectify the issue and thats the key. Dress code, headbands, twitter... but not really get into the meat and potatos of one of the things that make people question the integrity of your league more than ever.
                  I've actually got no problem with people complaining about them. I definitely understand, and have yelled at my share of refs in person. It's frustrating to watch sometimes. But I don't think it's as easy to fix as that. Basketball refs are bad at all levels... always have been. It's a really, really hard game to referee. And I really don't think refs are getting worse, I think players are getting better at influencing them. I agree with switching up the crews, but I don't think putting more in a game will help. And I don't think there are better refs out there than the ones in the NBA now. It's unfortunate.

                  Comment

                  • BringTheHeat
                    MVP
                    • Jan 2012
                    • 2264

                    #2124
                    Re: ****2012 NBA FINALS DISCUSSION THREAD****

                    Originally posted by NINJAK2
                    Dude. I can think for myself. I'm not an OU fan (check my 76er avatar)and I don't let the media tell me what to think. I've been complaining about officiating for years in the NBA. Think what you want..
                    I didn't say you were an OU fan..just sayin' that other sports get as much crap as the NBA, mainly college football. And this series is especially whined about because about 40% of the people watching the series are Thunder fans. And as people have said before, the NBA is pretty hard to officiate I'd think.
                    "To the last minute, to the last second, to the last man, we fight"

                    Comment

                    • NINJAK2
                      *S *dd*ct
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 6185

                      #2125
                      Re: ****2012 NBA FINALS DISCUSSION THREAD****

                      Originally posted by wwharton
                      There are more complaints with the NBA bc NBA refs have the hardest jobs.

                      1. If they call every infraction by the book, we would absolutely hate the product.
                      2. There's more nonstop action than other sports.
                      3. Players try to take advantage of how hard the job is by acting like they're fouled even when they're not.

                      We really shouldn't be expecting a perfectly called game... ever. Refs are part of the game, that's just how it is. It's hard to accept so you can't help but get mad at calls that look obvious. But at the end of the day, something could probably be called every single time down the court. A travel, reaching call, hand on the back of the post player, moving screens, holds on box outs, etc. We really don't want perfect refs.
                      Where did I ask for perfection wwharton. I said consistency man. Different things. A foul on one end is a foul on the other, etc, etc. If they can't officiate a game right don't you think it's about that time they made changes to ensure that they can do so? Add another body or something. That excuse that officiating an NBA game is hard is really getting old to me. It's really hard to say I would be disgusted with more infractions called-Let's see it happen 1st. The Heat/Bos series had plenty of moving screens, over the back fouls, etc called and that did not curtail my interest in those games at all. If players don't want traveling, fouls, or holds called don't do them-It's as simple as that. I don't think the answer is to look the other way when they happen in order to not interupt the flow of a game. That makes zero sense to me. Mean you no disrespect.

                      I am also well aware of players selling calls and that working lies equally on the refs as well as the players due to the fact that refs often call what they THINK happend rather than what they actually saw with THEIR OWN EYES.
                      Last edited by NINJAK2; 06-18-2012, 08:39 PM.
                      EA and 2k have the unfortunate task of trying to balance on a tightrope of fun and sim while trying not to fall 10,000 feet to their death. Instead of a safety net waiting down below there will just be angry customers quick to move out of the way and talk of their failure.

                      Comment

                      • NINJAK2
                        *S *dd*ct
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 6185

                        #2126
                        Re: ****2012 NBA FINALS DISCUSSION THREAD****

                        Originally posted by BringTheHeat
                        I didn't say you were an OU fan..just sayin' that other sports get as much crap as the NBA, mainly college football. And this series is especially whined about because about 40% of the people watching the series are Thunder fans. And as people have said before, the NBA is pretty hard to officiate I'd think.
                        Heat- do you really think people complain about College Football officiating equally as much as NBA officiating?
                        EA and 2k have the unfortunate task of trying to balance on a tightrope of fun and sim while trying not to fall 10,000 feet to their death. Instead of a safety net waiting down below there will just be angry customers quick to move out of the way and talk of their failure.

                        Comment

                        • Sam Marlowe
                          Banned
                          • Aug 2010
                          • 1230

                          #2127
                          Re: ****2012 NBA FINALS DISCUSSION THREAD****

                          Originally posted by NINJAK2
                          Heat- do you really think people complain about College Football officiating equally as much as NBA officiating?
                          This is mostly a function of where you live. Here in the South (SEC country, Roll Tide btw) you better believe fans do. The higher the stakes the more fans will complain.

                          Comment

                          • Scott812313
                            MVP
                            • Jun 2009
                            • 1877

                            #2128
                            Re: ****2012 NBA FINALS DISCUSSION THREAD****

                            Originally posted by NINJAK2
                            Where did I ask for perfection wwharton. I said consistency man. Different things. A foul on one end is a foul on the other, etc, etc. If they can't officiate a game right don't you think it's about that time they made changes to ensure that they can do so? Add another body or something. That excuse that officiating an NBA game is hard is really getting old to me. It's really hard to say I would be disgusted with more infractions called-Let's see it happen 1st. The Heat/Bos series had plenty of moving screens, over the back fouls, etc called and that did not curtail my interest in those games at all. If players don't want traveling, fouls, or holds called don't do them-It's as simple as that. I don't think the answer is to look the other way when they happen in order to not interupt the flow of a game. That makes zero sense to me. Mean you no disrespect.

                            I am also well aware of players selling calls and that working lies equally on the refs as well as the players due to the fact that refs often call what they THINK happend rather than what they actually saw with THEIR OWN EYES.
                            This is one of the 2 main issues I have with officiating. The call Wade got last night on the reverse layup is the perfect example of an anticipation call, the ref saw Harden touch Wade's back/hip and called a foul, even though he didn't push/bump/grab him.
                            "In the morning he would read the Bible with another coach. Then, in the afternoon, he would go out and cheat kids who had probably saved up money from mowing lawns to buy those raffle tickets. That's Jim Tressel."

                            Comment

                            • The 24th Letter
                              ERA
                              • Oct 2007
                              • 39373

                              #2129
                              So, how about those NBA Finals?

                              Comment

                              • Hawaii_Stars
                                MVP
                                • Jun 2003
                                • 4308

                                #2130
                                Re: ****2012 NBA FINALS DISCUSSION THREAD****

                                Let's just make it easy for the refs...No blood no foul.
                                Jokes aside, officiating is hard in all sports. Athletes are bigger, faster, stronger etc... I think the reason we get so upset is there are so many different angles to see a play at. We can see everything that went on during the play, whereas an official only has one set of eyes from one angle. So I kinda agree with having more refs, because you have more eyes from different angles watching what's going on. We can even have refs for both sides of the court so these old as officials don't have to break a hip just to get into position and by the time they look at the play, they miss the action and guess what might have happened..

                                Comment

                                Working...