2014 Off-Season Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ojandpizza
    Hall Of Fame
    • Apr 2011
    • 29807

    #6811
    2014 Off-Season Thread

    Originally posted by BlueNGold
    My point is that the talk about Love has jumped so far to the other direction just for people to try and make their points. Like the line about him going to the Cavs and suddenly becoming a 17 & 7 player. What? Where is this crystal ball at?

    I don't disagree with a lot of what's been said, and keep in mind I'm on the side that thinks the Cavs shouldn't be putting all their chips in for Love, but the fact is they would be adding one of the best 20 players in the league. From the sounds of some of these arguments though, he's just another guy, which isn't the case at all.

    Nobody knows for sure what kind of numbers Love would have, what people are saying is that it's highly unlikely he gets to join Cleveland with Kyrie, LeBron, Waiters/Wiggins, and still take 19 shots per game. Regardless of how great of a player he is he's going to individually take a hit because currently he has a team built around him where in Cleveland he'll be a piece to a team built around LeBron.. Whoever said he will average 17 and 7 could be completely wrong, but it's no worse than the people who act like nothing will change and he'll still be at 25 and 12.

    I don't really think anyone believes he's just "another guy".. I think everyone against the trade still acknowledges how great of a player Kevin Love is individually.. But if he's not a great fit all your doing is overpaying for a big name on the back of a jersey.

    Miami did the same with Bosh. It worked out for them but we still wonder if they could have been better off splitting that money. For the price of Bosh they could have paid 3 starters to pair with James and Wade.. Or a PF and C duo that together was much better than Bosh+Joel or Bosh+Battier, and actually could rebound..

    It's fairly easy to play 3rd or 4th fiddle behind great players and hit open shots.. For example, Ryan Anderson scores just as many points and grabs just as many rebounds as Chris Bosh despite coming off the bench and never even being close to all-star caliber, much less "big 3" status. David Lee is up there with Bosh, Thad Young, Paul Millsap, Nene, Davis West, Markieff Morris, Faried.. Bosh is better than all of these guys individually, some of them by a huge margin. But when your role gets reduced and you're no longer "the guy" output vs. output can almost always be replaced by someone at a much cheaper cost.

    Will Love dip as much as Bosh? It's hard to tell, I personally believe he would still be a double digit rebounder, but his scoring would fall.. Kyrie and LeBron I would expect to have similar shot attempts as Wade and LeBron, while Wiggins/Waiters and Varejao would likely have a bigger offensive role than Bibby/Mario or Joel/Battier ever did.. It's a lot of shots to go around. We can't expect all of them to just pick up exactly where they left off last season.

    And some people seem content with trading away multiple future first round picks, because they will be "late round" picks.. Yet in the past decade or so we've saw Michael Redd, Gilbert Arenas, Carlos Boozer, Luis Scola, Monta Ellis, Marcin Gortat, Paul Millsap, Marc Gasol, Isaiah Thomas, and Chandler Parsons all get drafted in the 2ND ROUND.. And San Antonio just won a championship with only a 3rd year player winning finals MVP who was taken 15th, and a member of their "big 3" in Manu who was a 2nd rounder as well.. Draft picks hold a tons of value, whether it's to trade to rebuilding teams, trade up in the draft, or keep to gamble on young talent.. There is no reason to unload multiple picks unless you have to. Because if Cleveland happened to stumble upon a Marcin Gortat or Michael Redd in this years draft they would be loaded for the next 5-6 years.

    IMO the only reason to trade so much youth, potential, and depth for a guy like Love is if you're a team who desperately needs a "go to" or franchise player, or even a true "side kick" guy.. Cleveland doesn't need that, nor do they need the extra star power to just add extra star power.

    And like I've said many times this entire discussion would be much different if Love was a lock down defender, an elite rim protector, or really just 7+ foot tall center with a bigger post arsenal.. But he's not. His biggest strengths are stretching the floor and rebounding and Cleveland definitely won't be hurting in those areas.. Doesn't matter if he's a top 3 caliber player player or a top 50. It's all about the fit and price, right now I think the price for Love is much too high for his fit in Cleveland.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Last edited by ojandpizza; 07-24-2014, 11:14 AM.

    Comment

    • ojandpizza
      Hall Of Fame
      • Apr 2011
      • 29807

      #6812
      Re: 2014 Off-Season Thread

      Originally posted by SteelersFreak
      Yeah, I think Jameer definitely starts for us. He's a better long range threat than either Harris or Felton and he plays a much more composed and organized game at the point than either one of them either. Harris is much better suited coming off the bench with his speed and defensive ability. I have a feeling he'll likely be playing at the end of close games too.

      All those entry passes to Dwight should have him pretty familiar with how to get the ball to Dirk as well.. Something that didn't show up in a box score but was a way Calderon had great value.


      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

      Comment

      • wwharton
        *ll St*r
        • Aug 2002
        • 26949

        #6813
        Re: 2014 Off-Season Thread

        Originally posted by ProfessaPackMan
        Wwharton, does my comment I made the other day make more sense now? Lol
        no comment, lol

        Originally posted by ojandpizza
        I guess it depends how you look at it.

        As of last season he's still a double digit scorer, and just two playoffs ago he hit the biggest shot of his career and of that finals series..

        So I guess just depends how you look at it. I could see some people saying he's hurting his career by taking a smaller role, and I could see others saying he's helping it by being a key part to championship squads..

        Either way I'm not sure how much it matters.. Ray had a great career, but he's not an "All Time" guy. He probably won't be remembered for much other than being an All-Star caliber player who passed Reggie for all time 3's.


        Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
        Shaq's fairwell tour was ten times worse than what Ray's done, and Shaq couldn't even play half the number of games. I don't remember anybody worrying about how that'd effect his legacy.

        Hell, before James even made his decision I'm pretty sure Allen said that if he didn't retire he'd likely play with Lebron somewhere so this really isn't news.

        Comment

        • King_B_Mack
          All Star
          • Jan 2009
          • 24450

          #6814
          Re: 2014 Off-Season Thread

          Originally posted by wwharton
          no comment, lol



          Shaq's fairwell tour was ten times worse than what Ray's done, and Shaq couldn't even play half the number of games. I don't remember anybody worrying about how that'd effect his legacy.

          Hell, before James even made his decision I'm pretty sure Allen said that if he didn't retire he'd likely play with Lebron somewhere so this really isn't news.
          People did talk about how all the different teams would affect Shaq's legacy. But there was no Twitter then so it wasn't as constant a thing as now, but it was definitely a point brought up.

          Comment

          • wwharton
            *ll St*r
            • Aug 2002
            • 26949

            #6815
            Re: 2014 Off-Season Thread

            Originally posted by King_B_Mack
            People did talk about how all the different teams would affect Shaq's legacy. But there was no Twitter then so it wasn't as constant a thing as now, but it was definitely a point brought up.
            Nah, can't get with you on this one. People talked about Shaq in general. Hell I talked about Shaq in general. It's well known that he spent most of his career matching up with great guards and he's been joked about it, but it definitely was never brought up as a hit to his legacy.

            Shaq ain't that old. Twitter was around... so was facebook and definitely OS. The only knock on Shaq's legacy has been his work ethic and trying to be hollywood instead of the GOAT. But most importantly, he's retired now so we can judge for ourselves. Has it negatively effected him? I'd say absolutely not.

            Comment

            • 23
              yellow
              • Sep 2002
              • 66469

              #6816
              Re: 2014 Off-Season Thread

              Originally posted by wwharton
              Nah, can't get with you on this one. People talked about Shaq in general. Hell I talked about Shaq in general. It's well known that he spent most of his career matching up with great guards and he's been joked about it, but it definitely was never brought up as a hit to his legacy.

              Shaq ain't that old. Twitter was around... so was facebook and definitely OS. The only knock on Shaq's legacy has been his work ethic and trying to be hollywood instead of the GOAT. But most importantly, he's retired now so we can judge for ourselves. Has it negatively effected him? I'd say absolutely not.
              Whats ironic is because twitter didn't become popular among athletes until Shaq put it out there.

              Comment

              • ojandpizza
                Hall Of Fame
                • Apr 2011
                • 29807

                #6817
                Re: 2014 Off-Season Thread

                Man Shaq really could have been something if he had the work ethic some of the other greats had.. Especially since he missed today's big men, and caught the tail end of the 90's generation.. His biggest matchups were Ben Wallace and Yao Ming lol. Can't really knock him though. I think he thoroughly enjoyed the game.. Some of these guys put so much into it that it seems to become a chore, they do nothing else in life.

                Completely off topic and rambling, my bad for that lol.


                Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                Comment

                • wwharton
                  *ll St*r
                  • Aug 2002
                  • 26949

                  #6818
                  Re: 2014 Off-Season Thread

                  Originally posted by ojandpizza
                  Man Shaq really could have been something if he had the work ethic some of the other greats had.. Especially since he missed today's big men, and caught the tail end of the 90's generation.. His biggest matchups were Ben Wallace and Yao Ming lol. Can't really knock him though. I think he thoroughly enjoyed the game.. Some of these guys put so much into it that it seems to become a chore, they do nothing else in life.

                  Completely off topic and rambling, my bad for that lol.


                  Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                  I'll correct that and say his "biggest" match ups were Ming, Divac and Arvydas (and the last two were over the hill from the jump). Wallace was a tough defender but not big... we can also add Zo and maybe even Duncan to the "Wallace" level, but that just further supports your point.

                  I've criticized Shaq more than anyone bc I really think he has no excuse not being considered, HANDS DOWN, the greatest player of all time. But now that he's retired, like you said, I have to lay off him. He was a champion, definitely knew how to turn on the game face while still being a clown and keeping in front of the camera off the court. Can't be mad at a man having a ball playing the sport he loves and STILL end up being considered one of the greatest to ever do it.

                  Comment

                  • OkayC
                    MVP
                    • Apr 2013
                    • 1928

                    #6819
                    Re: 2014 Off-Season Thread

                    Originally posted by ojandpizza
                    Man Shaq really could have been something if he had the work ethic some of the other greats had.. Especially since he missed today's big men, and caught the tail end of the 90's generation.. His biggest matchups were Ben Wallace and Yao Ming lol. Can't really knock him though. I think he thoroughly enjoyed the game.. Some of these guys put so much into it that it seems to become a chore, they do nothing else in life.

                    Completely off topic and rambling, my bad for that lol.


                    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                    I liked shaq cuz he seemed to enjoy the game. Basketball was just fun for him, where as other guys it seemed like it was just a chore. Everybody else seem to be obsessed with winning and being great, so that people would talk about them ten years down the road. But shaq legitimately enjoyed himself, and i admire any star player, or just players in general who dont seem to obsess over winning, and just play in the nba to have fun. Cuz in the grand scheme of things, legacies and championships dont mean anything. There great achievements for the moment, but they dont define your whole life.

                    Lol now im the one whos rambling.
                    Last edited by OkayC; 07-24-2014, 03:24 PM.
                    Lakers
                    Trojans
                    49'ers

                    Comment

                    • wwharton
                      *ll St*r
                      • Aug 2002
                      • 26949

                      #6820
                      Re: 2014 Off-Season Thread

                      Originally posted by OkayC
                      I liked shaq cuz he seemed to enjoy the game. Basketball was just fun for him, where as other guys it seemed like it was just a chore. Everybody else seem to be obsessed with winning and being great, so that people would talk about them ten years down the road. But shaq legitimately enjoyed himself, and i admire any star player, or just players in general who dont seem to obsess over winning, and just play in the nba to have fun. Cuz in the grand scheme of things, legacies and championships dont mean anything. There great achievements for the moment, but they dont define your whole life.

                      Lol now im the one whos rambling.
                      I don't want to shoot down your point (bc you're right) but Shaq did care about winning and legacy too. Otherwise he would've stayed in Orlando. Yes, he wanted to do movies but it was a much bigger draw to be in that organization and be one of the long line of Laker great centers/players. But generally speaking you're right.

                      Comment

                      • iLLosophy
                        Plata o Plomo
                        • Sep 2005
                        • 3673

                        #6821
                        Re: 2014 Off-Season Thread

                        Wait did I read this correctly? I saw the names Nelson and Aminu, and somehow, the mavs are NOW "stacked"? Stacked with those two means they were stacked before those two lol
                        Last edited by iLLosophy; 07-24-2014, 04:03 PM.

                        Comment

                        • OkayC
                          MVP
                          • Apr 2013
                          • 1928

                          #6822
                          Re: 2014 Off-Season Thread

                          Originally posted by wwharton
                          I don't want to shoot down your point (bc you're right) but Shaq did care about winning and legacy too. Otherwise he would've stayed in Orlando. Yes, he wanted to do movies but it was a much bigger draw to be in that organization and be one of the long line of Laker great centers/players. But generally speaking you're right.
                          I agree he did care, but i was always of the opinion that he didnt care as much as most other players did. I could be wrong tho, he may have cared more than i or anyone else may ever know.
                          Lakers
                          Trojans
                          49'ers

                          Comment

                          • wwharton
                            *ll St*r
                            • Aug 2002
                            • 26949

                            #6823
                            Re: 2014 Off-Season Thread

                            Originally posted by OkayC
                            I agree he did care, but i was always of the opinion that he didnt care as much as most other players did. I could be wrong tho, he may have cared more than i or anyone else may ever know.
                            Yeah, your last point is true (we don't know), but I agree he didn't let it consume him like Kobe for example. He also may have cared more when he was young (going from Orlando to LA) and trying to put his stamp on the league.

                            Comment

                            • jeremym480
                              Speak it into existence
                              • Oct 2008
                              • 18198

                              #6824
                              Re: 2014 Off-Season Thread

                              Originally posted by iLLosophy
                              Wait did I read this correctly? I saw the names Nelson and Aminu, and somehow, the mavs are NOW "stacked"? Stacked with those two means they were stacked before those two lol


                              No one is saying that they're stacked just because they signed Aminu and Nelson.

                              It's those moves coupled with their success against the Spurs in the playoffs (they played them as well as anyone) as well as their other off-season moves (signing Parsons and trading for Chandler for example).

                              I don't see how anyone can see that they're not a team on the rise. They may not be a top 3-4 team in the regular season, but watch out for them come playoff time.
                              My 2K17 Boston Celtics MyLeague

                              Alabama Crimson Tide
                              Green Bay Packers
                              Boston Celtics

                              New Orleans Pelicans

                              Comment

                              • ojandpizza
                                Hall Of Fame
                                • Apr 2011
                                • 29807

                                #6825
                                Re: 2014 Off-Season Thread




                                Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                                Comment

                                Working...