Recommended Videos

Collapse

Boxing Off-Topic

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
Collapse
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #4621
    gmac0322
    MVP
    • Aug 2009
    • 1650

    Re: Boxing Off-Topic


    Re: Boxing Off-Topic

    Originally posted by JayBee74
    Yeah, I hated Miller (and continue to). I was making the argument that Tessatore will be so bad that even Miller would look good.
    I definitely am with you. Just awful commentary

    Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

    Comment

    • #4622
      pietasterp
      All Star
      • Feb 2004
      • 6308

      Re: Boxing Off-Topic


      Re: Boxing Off-Topic

      To me, Manny didn't look good in that bout, Matthysse just looked bad. Really bad. "Needs to retire immediately" bad. Matthysse is just a wisp of a shell of what he once was and has been that way for some time. He really hasn't been the same guy since the Garcia fight, in retrospect.


      Re: Tessitore, he's not bad on college football. The announcers for MNF make no difference to me in general. I actually liked Dennis Miller; I mean, it's football, it's entertainment, I liked the constant joking and snide comments. When the game got boring, at least Miller would keep it semi-entertaining. Unless the color team is really going to go hard into the nuts-and-bolts of the play-calling (which I'd love but almost never happens...Romo isn't bad at it, but can't think of too many others that I actually learn something from), I'd rather they just be funny and/or entertaining.

      BTW, Miller has a pretty funny anecdote about his time on MNF in one of his stand-up routines, if you ever happen to be channel surfing and see it on HBO or whatever.

      Comment

      • #4623
        JayBee74
        Hall Of Fame
        • Jul 2002
        • 22989

        Re: Boxing Off-Topic


        Re: Boxing Off-Topic

        Originally posted by pietasterp
        I actually liked Dennis Miller; I mean, it's football, it's entertainment, I liked the constant joking and snide comments. When the game got boring, at least Miller would keep it semi-entertaining.
        I never thought he was entertaining but I must confess to being biased-I simply can't stand this guy. He's the epitome of a pompous pseudo-intellectual.

        Comment

        • #4624
          sheredia
          MVP
          • Apr 2006
          • 2362

          Re: Boxing Off-Topic


          Re: Boxing Off-Topic

          Originally posted by JayBee74
          I never thought he was entertaining but I must confess to being biased-I simply can't stand this guy. He's the epitome of a pompous pseudo-intellectual.
          i guess the producers wanted to try some comic relief for possible boring games but if they match two good teams (or rivals), you won't have to worry about that....

          Comment

          • #4625
            sheredia
            MVP
            • Apr 2006
            • 2362

            Re: Boxing Off-Topic


            Re: Boxing Off-Topic

            Originally posted by pietasterp
            To me, Manny didn't look good in that bout, Matthysse just looked bad. Really bad. "Needs to retire immediately" bad. Matthysse is just a wisp of a shell of what he once was and has been that way for some time. He really hasn't been the same guy since the Garcia fight, in retrospect.


            Re: Tessitore, he's not bad on college football. The announcers for MNF make no difference to me in general. I actually liked Dennis Miller; I mean, it's football, it's entertainment, I liked the constant joking and snide comments. When the game got boring, at least Miller would keep it semi-entertaining. Unless the color team is really going to go hard into the nuts-and-bolts of the play-calling (which I'd love but almost never happens...Romo isn't bad at it, but can't think of too many others that I actually learn something from), I'd rather they just be funny and/or entertaining.

            BTW, Miller has a pretty funny anecdote about his time on MNF in one of his stand-up routines, if you ever happen to be channel surfing and see it on HBO or whatever.
            i was thinking the same thing.....however, i really like romo. he almost literally predicts plays before they happen. he breaks them down and everything. he's got a good personality for TV too.

            Comment

            • #4626
              pk500
              All Star
              • Jul 2002
              • 8062

              Re: Boxing Off-Topic


              Re: Boxing Off-Topic

              Originally posted by RockinDaMike
              Straight domination. Manny Looked fantastic today


              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
              Against an opponent who is even more washed than him.

              This is a false dawn. Nothing more. Quality welters like Crawford, Spence or Thurman would destroy this diminished Pacquiao.
              Xbox Live: pk4425

              Comment

              • #4627
                pk500
                All Star
                • Jul 2002
                • 8062

                Re: Boxing Off-Topic


                Re: Boxing Off-Topic

                Originally posted by sheredia
                with this performance, does a bout with crawford loom in the near future?
                Crawford would maul Pacquiao like a cat catching a chipmunk, flinging it into the air until it was bored and then snapping its neck for the kill.
                Xbox Live: pk4425

                Comment

                • #4628
                  pk500
                  All Star
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 8062

                  Re: Boxing Off-Topic


                  Re: Boxing Off-Topic

                  Originally posted by gmac0322
                  I definitely am with you. Just awful commentary

                  Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
                  The problem isn't Tessitore. He's a very good announcer. The problem is ESPN's relationship with Top Rank.

                  Top Rank handles all boxing content for ESPN, so ESPN essentially is just a promotional vehicle for Top Rank. Tessitore, Bradley and Kriegel essentially are Top Rank shills, pushing all narratives the promotional company desires HARD on the air.

                  Tessitore was far more objective and less histrionic when he called "Friday Night Fights" with Teddy Atlas. That was a straight ESPN production, so the Worldwide Leader wasn't a puppet of one promotional company like it is now.

                  Fellas, I work in the sports PR business. You can doubt me all you want, but this is now certain TV relationships work.
                  Xbox Live: pk4425

                  Comment

                  • #4629
                    gmac0322
                    MVP
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 1650

                    Re: Boxing Off-Topic


                    Re: Boxing Off-Topic

                    Originally posted by pk500
                    The problem isn't Tessitore. He's a very good announcer. The problem is ESPN's relationship with Top Rank.

                    Top Rank handles all boxing content for ESPN, so ESPN essentially is just a promotional vehicle for Top Rank. Tessitore, Bradley and Kriegel essentially are Top Rank shills, pushing all narratives the promotional company desires HARD on the air.

                    Tessitore was far more objective and less histrionic when he called "Friday Night Fights" with Teddy Atlas. That was a straight ESPN production, so the Worldwide Leader wasn't a puppet of one promotional company like it is now.

                    Fellas, I work in the sports PR business. You can doubt me all you want, but this is now certain TV relationships work.
                    I am not necessarily disagreeing with you on the brown nosing of top rank or any star on espn. But that night was awful. And I cant agree with your take on Miller but I think he was also awful on snl too. I resume judgement on the tessatore on mnf.

                    Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

                    Comment

                    • #4630
                      edaddy
                      MVP
                      • Jun 2004
                      • 2848

                      Re: Boxing Off-Topic


                      Re: Boxing Off-Topic

                      Originally posted by pk500
                      Against an opponent who is even more washed than him.

                      This is a false dawn. Nothing more. Quality welters like Crawford, Spence or Thurman would destroy this diminished Pacquiao.
                      Lol I agree with this and I dont get all the sudden Pac hype..Mathassye was washed and was a literal punching bag...even with that I saw a much slower Pac who clearly doesnt have the vaunted quickness foot speed or reflexes he had even a year ago...I love to analyze fights and picture matchyps.He would get picked apart and get stopped by any top welterweight..His best bet is to fight a Broner who lets you get off for 6 rds..and doesnt take risks..Pacs f8ght needs to get put in perspective..it was a good win against a lifeless opponent .his delusion is going to get him out to sleep..
                      THANKS FOR THE TRADE SANDIEGO KEEP RIVERS WE'LL TAKE ELI

                      Comment

                      • #4631
                        pietasterp
                        All Star
                        • Feb 2004
                        • 6308

                        Re: Boxing Off-Topic


                        Re: Boxing Off-Topic

                        Originally posted by pk500
                        The problem isn't Tessitore. He's a very good announcer. The problem is ESPN's relationship with Top Rank.

                        Top Rank handles all boxing content for ESPN, so ESPN essentially is just a promotional vehicle for Top Rank. Tessitore, Bradley and Kriegel essentially are Top Rank shills, pushing all narratives the promotional company desires HARD on the air.

                        Tessitore was far more objective and less histrionic when he called "Friday Night Fights" with Teddy Atlas. That was a straight ESPN production, so the Worldwide Leader wasn't a puppet of one promotional company like it is now.

                        Fellas, I work in the sports PR business. You can doubt me all you want, but this is now certain TV relationships work.
                        I can't see how anyone could disagree with this. That is what is happening. There's a long-term fiduciary connection between Top Rank and ESPN, and that changes the fundamental nature of the relationship. CBS and Fox aren't going to rip the NFL on their NFL broadcasts. Same principle applies here.


                        (although maybe the more apt metaphor is "Mean" Gene Okerlund isn't going to criticize the WWF on the air during a broadcast....or whoever does that stuff now, I'm obviously way out of the loop on wrestling LOL)

                        Originally posted by gmac0322
                        I am not necessarily disagreeing with you on the brown nosing of top rank or any star on espn. But that night was awful. And I cant agree with your take on Miller but I think he was also awful on snl too. I resume judgement on the tessatore on mnf.
                        That was my take on Dennis Miller. And obviously I was in the vast minority of people that enjoyed him on MNF. But I totally understand that he's a love-him or hate-him type of person and I can see how he could be really grating to people.

                        Originally posted by edaddy
                        Lol I agree with this and I dont get all the sudden Pac hype..Mathassye was washed and was a literal punching bag...even with that I saw a much slower Pac who clearly doesnt have the vaunted quickness foot speed or reflexes he had even a year ago...I love to analyze fights and picture matchyps.He would get picked apart and get stopped by any top welterweight..His best bet is to fight a Broner who lets you get off for 6 rds..and doesnt take risks..Pacs f8ght needs to get put in perspective..it was a good win against a lifeless opponent .his delusion is going to get him out to sleep..
                        His delusion, and that of casual fight fans, is going to continue to get him paid though...$$$ If we've learned nothing else in our collective time paying attention to the fight game, it's that the only thing that matters is who is getting paid and how much.

                        Comment

                        • #4632
                          JayBee74
                          Hall Of Fame
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 22989

                          Re: Boxing Off-Topic


                          Re: Boxing Off-Topic

                          Originally posted by pk500
                          The problem isn't Tessitore. He's a very good announcer. The problem is ESPN's relationship with Top Rank.
                          Is he an announcer or analyst when he does college football? I do not like him as a boxing analyst.

                          Originally posted by edaddy
                          ...even with that I saw a much slower Pac who clearly doesnt have the vaunted quickness foot speed or reflexes he had even a year ago...
                          You think? I thought he looked a lot quicker and more powerful against Mathyesse than he did against Jeff Horn (one year ago).

                          Originally posted by pk500
                          Crawford would maul Pacquiao like a cat catching a chipmunk, flinging it into the air until it was bored and then snapping its neck for the kill.
                          You will never see that fight. Pac is already trying to pay his IRS debt and then some with a Floyd Mayweather rematch.

                          Comment

                          • #4633
                            gmac0322
                            MVP
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 1650

                            Re: Boxing Off-Topic


                            Re: Boxing Off-Topic

                            Pacman was also trying to get the Connor thing going too.

                            Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

                            Comment

                            • #4634
                              edaddy
                              MVP
                              • Jun 2004
                              • 2848

                              Re: Boxing Off-Topic


                              Re: Boxing Off-Topic

                              Originally posted by pietasterp
                              I can't see how anyone could disagree with this. That is what is happening. There's a long-term fiduciary connection between Top Rank and ESPN, and that changes the fundamental nature of the relationship. CBS and Fox aren't going to rip the NFL on their NFL broadcasts. Same principle applies here.


                              (although maybe the more apt metaphor is "Mean" Gene Okerlund isn't going to criticize the WWF on the air during a broadcast....or whoever does that stuff now, I'm obviously way out of the loop on wrestling LOL)



                              That was my take on Dennis Miller. And obviously I was in the vast minority of people that enjoyed him on MNF. But I totally understand that he's a love-him or hate-him type of person and I can see how he could be really grating to people.



                              His delusion, and that of casual fight fans, is going to continue to get him paid though...$$$ If we've learned nothing else in our collective time paying attention to the fight game, it's that the only thing that matters is who is getting paid and how much.
                              I agree my man and thats the oroblem with boxing now..If I am One of the top welterweights or Lomo I am looking for a easy payday with a faded boxing great on my resume..The story has been written before this wont end well for Pac..unless he gets Horn or Broner..anyone else and its a wrap.
                              THANKS FOR THE TRADE SANDIEGO KEEP RIVERS WE'LL TAKE ELI

                              Comment

                              • #4635
                                JayBee74
                                Hall Of Fame
                                • Jul 2002
                                • 22989

                                Re: Boxing Off-Topic


                                Re: Boxing Off-Topic

                                Kahn would be the most logical fight for Pacquiao. I don't even think his base wants him to fight Crawford or Spence.

                                Comment

                                Working...