PlayStation 4 Discussion
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
N.Y Mets
N.Y Giants
N.Y Knicks
N.Y Islanders
Miami Hurricanes
Twitter - @RoyalBoyle78
XBOX LIVE - Royalboyle78
PSN - RoyalBoyle78 -
Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion
The PS3 also didn't have any kind of great technological advancement that's well supported of from the tv and movie industry.
The PS3 supports blu ray/1080p/3D. So does the PS4 minus 3D.
4K is the next big thing if you like it or not. Sony is trying to get ahead of technology like they did with blu ray and the PS3.
All technology companies come up with something better after 2-3 years. Phones, TVs, tablets, computers/laptops. What made you think gaming consoles was exempt from this?
Sony doesn't owe us anything. Their only job is to make money and it appears they believe a 4K console is the correct choice. I like it and I'll buy it just because it can play 4K movies.
If price came down really affordable with OLED, 4k wouldn't exist long at all. Cause OLED is the tech I want and would crush 4k imo.
where else , N.Y today everyday day!N.Y Mets
N.Y Giants
N.Y Knicks
N.Y Islanders
Miami Hurricanes
Twitter - @RoyalBoyle78
XBOX LIVE - Royalboyle78
PSN - RoyalBoyle78Comment
-
Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion
The PS3 also didn't have any kind of great technological advancement that's well supported of from the tv and movie industry.
The PS3 supports blu ray/1080p/3D. So does the PS4 minus 3D.
4K is the next big thing if you like it or not. Sony is trying to get ahead of technology like they did with blu ray and the PS3.
All technology companies come up with something better after 2-3 years. Phones, TVs, tablets, computers/laptops. What made you think gaming consoles was exempt from this?
Sony doesn't owe us anything. Their only job is to make money and it appears they believe a 4K console is the correct choice. I like it and I'll buy it just because it can play 4K movies.Comment
-
N.Y Mets
N.Y Giants
N.Y Knicks
N.Y Islanders
Miami Hurricanes
Twitter - @RoyalBoyle78
XBOX LIVE - Royalboyle78
PSN - RoyalBoyle78Comment
-
Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion
Hmmm, but for $400-$500, you WON'T be getting 4K. Costs a lot more than that. This is what is so funny. Gamers thinking that they will get this and when they don't, they will still be complaining about the games not looking good enough and the consoles are still underpowered. Smh.
Of course you won't get true 4K gaming. I don't think anyone has suggested that but you'll be able to play 4K movies and stream 4K content and games will look better than the PS4.MLB: Texas Rangers
Soccer: FC Dallas, Fleetwood Town
NCAA: SMU, UTA
NFL: Dallas Cowboys
NHL: Dallas Stars
NBA: Dallas Mavericks
I own a band check it outComment
-
Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion
FF. What in he living Hell is your signature supposed to be saying?
Come on man, use your words.Comment
-
Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion
It really is a users choice. OLED has shortfalls such as burn in and longevity issues.
Plasma TVs were generally seen as better than LCDs but LCDs were cheaper and that's what consumers picked.MLB: Texas Rangers
Soccer: FC Dallas, Fleetwood Town
NCAA: SMU, UTA
NFL: Dallas Cowboys
NHL: Dallas Stars
NBA: Dallas Mavericks
I own a band check it outComment
-
N.Y Mets
N.Y Giants
N.Y Knicks
N.Y Islanders
Miami Hurricanes
Twitter - @RoyalBoyle78
XBOX LIVE - Royalboyle78
PSN - RoyalBoyle78Comment
-
Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion
OLED and 4k aren't even competing technologies.
PS3 slim/super slim both were improved, they both did Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD MA bitstreaming which, just like 4k, was a big deal if you had the hardware that supported it.Comment
-
Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion
Speaking of the PC vs consoles "debate"...just over 4 years ago I spent $2800 on a top of the line ASUS gaming laptop. Since I'm buying Quantum Break tomorrow I am getting a free copy of the Windows 10 version. I check the system specs thinking my laptop would run it but probably at lower settings.
Nope, my $2800 laptop which was as badass as they come 4 years and 1 month ago won't even run Quantum Break on the lowest possible setting.
Then I look over at my PS4 and Xbox One and remember why I prefer console gaming. I've had my PS4 for 2 years. I'll bet in 2 more years when its 4 years old it'll still be relevant to new PS4 games.
$399 versus $2,800 and the cheap one runs games for years and years while the other simply....doesn't. End of debate IMO.
That's simply a case of being uninformed enough to spend nearly 3000 dollars on a laptop for gaming and thinking it'd be "future-proofed" four years later for AAA games. Do you have a link to that exact laptop by the way and where you bought it? I'm just curious about the specs of a $3000 laptop from 2012.
That's a terrible comparison too but hey, like you said, end of debate.PS: You guys are great.
SteamID - Depotboy
...2009, 2011, 2012, 2015, 2017, 2020....
What a run
Roll Tide
Comment
-
Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion
Yeah, I know they did, and this probably won't even be at that level. This will probably be "one version runs at 30 fps" and "the other version runs at 60 with maybe an added effect or two."
But ya know what, Dan my man, I don't know for sure, and neither do you. None of us do. Nobody knows anything for sure.
I might get a PS4K tattoo on my forehead so I can proudly show my support everywhere I go.Last edited by The JareBear; 04-04-2016, 10:05 PM."Successful people do not celebrate in the adversity or misfortune of others."
OS Blog
The Tortured Mind Of A Rockies Fan. In Arenado I Trust.Comment
-
Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion
I would have been stoked to have an upgraded PS3 that could play games in 1080p instead of just having slimmer system with the same specs.Comment
-
Re: PlayStation 4 Discussion
Except the fact that there were no actual differences when playing the same game. If what has been rumored turns out to be true, there will be differences when playing the same game and comparing it between PS4 and PS4.5.
Also, the slim PS3 and super slim PS3 were cheaper than the previous model. PS4.5 will NOT be cheaper or even the same price. Instead, it will be more expensive.
Sometimes, I truly wonder how gamers don't see what's wrong with this but then I realize that these are the same gamers that purchase season passes, DLC, pay for micro-transactions, etc. which in turn makes me realize why Sony is doing this - because they know they have millions of morons who will support this even though they shouldn't.
So let me get this straight...a company is sneaky for not telling you their business plan from the start. Or for not jumping in with their announcement before their planned date because leaked rumors. Or deserve to fail because they introduce an enhanced product to do what a business does, try to make money. And before anything official is even said, you are smart enough to know they are ****ting on 40m customers and their hardware is useless. And people who choose to spend their money on something they want are morons because you wouldn't. I get all that right?
Why are you so entitled? And who are you to tell people how they should spend money?Comment
Comment