The data is bad. And what I mean by that is that it is incomplete. It is skewed by the fact it is based off of confirmed cases which means anyone who is asymptomatic or mild isn't reported or captured in these numbers. As one anecdotal point - my wife is a nurse and the hospital she works at won't test nurses unless they have a fever above a certain level and other symptoms. While they won't say this it is likely they won't test nurses because it is likely they test positive and if they are positive then they can't provide care because they have to quarantine.
Think about how many people one asymptomatic nurse would come in contact with daily.
Unless you know everyone who was infected within a certain period of time you won't be able to accurately assess mortality rate. You mention Italy- I believe the data there is heavily skewed towards older folks. I think the average age of a deceased patient is close to 80.
For what it is worth my mother used to work in bioterrorism for the department of homeland security and did this type of analysis and worked with epidemiologists....she is of the belief the mortality rate will end up being much lower than it is.
This isn't me trying to downplay. The fact this virus transmits so easily and is so lethal to certain segments of the population is reason for caution. We have taken the social distancing very seriously here in our household. I am just optimistic that when all is said and done mortality rates will be much lower then they appear to be.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Operation Sports mobile app
Comment