7 Players Are Rated an Overall 99 in Madden NFL 19, Your Thoughts?

[mattjames2010]

Quote: Originally Posted by TB5XSBW

Of course you won't accept sources that are far more knowledgeable about the game than you. This isn't a debate, kiddo. This was settled long ago. This is me telling you the way it is, and you stomping your foot and crying because you cant accept it. It's very amusing watching you lose it after getting absolutely obliterated.

Of course I don't accept the popular opinion just for the sake of popularity - I ask for opinions to be backed up. If it gets backed up with sufficient evidence, my opinion would sway.

The fact that I can provide you with statistics that prove you wrong and yet you counter with "Well the popular vote says" is not obliterating anything, it's a cop out. If you can't provide your own source, can back up your own claims with statistics - then you're not winning anything. The same goes for any coach and player that can't do the same.

You should be able to point out the specifics and you have failed to do so. Again, if you're trolling, then good job, kid. If not, I want you to back up your claim with an actual source that shows me data about Brady being better presnap - the only thing I can find on that is an article from 2011 that says Rodgers was the best in the league since becoming a starter at recognizing the blitz.

I'm getting bored now.

[mattjames2010]

Quote: Originally Posted by TheEndIsNear4All

THANK YOU!! I get people like to pretend that Tom and Gronk aren't deserving of any recognition, but c'mon now. Sent from my SM-G950U using Operation Sports mobile app

This isn't the argument being made.

[JayCutlersCig]

I can see we’re trying to get back on topic, but we clearly can’t because of a certain someone.

CM? Roadman? Little help, please?


Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports

[canes21]

Quote: Originally Posted by mattjames2010

....yeah, maybe you should. Despite your unjustified snark, when the game is released and their "system" and "archetypes" turns out to be an illusion and you as a player will have to take control of 32 teams to adjust around their bullcrap, we can come back here to this thread and you can attempt your sarcasm again. You think EA's AI is going to determine a slot receiver to an outside receiver? LOL please. How about a 3rd down pass rusher? Come on.

What exactly are you trying to get at here? Genuine question. With the archetypes being the way they are now and the new specialist depth charts the AI 100% should be able to differentiate a slot receiver from a boundary one and play them properly.

[mattjames2010]

Quote: Originally Posted by JayCutlersCig

I can see we’re trying to get back on topic, but we clearly can’t because of a certain someone. CM? Roadman? Little help, please? Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports

To be fair, this is still in context of ratings in Madden - I am trying to point out why Brady isn't deserving of a 99 rating (unless system is being factored in)

And to be clear, I don't even think Rodgers is deserving of a 99 at this point. I think Donald is the only one I'd truly give a 99 to since I can actually point to him being at his peak right now and dominating at every level.

One side of this argument is just getting too emotional and has fan goggles on - it shows why it's so difficult to have an accurate sports games, people can't be objective. That's how you have Tom Brady being a superman with a Favre-like arm in Madden.

[roadman]

Roadman isn't a mod, however, it's getting annoying seeing this back n forth continuing onward.

My strong suggestions would be to end it and get the thread going back to the OP stat.(no pun intended)

Or people can start hitting the Report A Post button as well.

[JayCutlersCig]

Quote: Originally Posted by TB5XSBW

Of course you won't accept sources that are far more knowledgeable about the game than you. This isn't a debate, kiddo. This was settled long ago. This is me telling you the way it is, and you stomping your foot and crying because you cant accept it. It's very amusing watching you lose it after getting absolutely obliterated.

I hate to go this route, but you leave me no choice.

The fact that you have no logical argument and, instead, choose to insult someone else over their opinion is incredibly immature and reveals your true age. You must have either A) started following football in 2007 or B) are so blinded by your love of the Pats that you can’t accept anyone else’s opinion.

I don’t care that you called Miami a bunch of losers; I was born into the fanbase and I’ll die in the fanbase. You’re not above anybody else because you pull for one of the best teams in football. Get over yourself, dude. What team are you gonna go for when Tom hangs up the cleats?

You’re embarrassing yourself. That’s all I have to say, and that’s the *last* thing I say. I do apologize if what I said was a bit over the line, but enough is enough.

Moving the hell on.


Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports

[roadman]

Quote: Originally Posted by mattjames2010

To be fair, this is still in context of ratings in Madden - I am trying to point out why Brady isn't deserving of a 99 rating (unless system is being factored in) And to be clear, I don't even think Rodgers is deserving of a 99 at this point. I think Donald is the only one I'd truly give a 99 to since I can actually point to him being at his peak right now and dominating at every level. One side of this argument is just getting too emotional and has fan goggles on - it shows why it's so difficult to have an accurate sports games, people can't be objective. That's how you have Tom Brady being a superman with a Favre-like arm in Madden.

Agree, but the back n forth with the same posters over the last few pages should cease including the borderline insulting that is going on.