|
Quote: |
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted by HighCmpPct |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well that is all absolutely correct, however the feedback doesn't take any of that into account as it's not on the game. People need to stop thinking of the feedback as the be all end all.
All it is is timing, and on top of that the "good" timing isn't actually what good timing would be on most pitches. "Good" timing on a inside pitch according to feedback isn't actually "good" timing, you're late you should've been early.
It's like the example I used earlier a get thrown a high fastball and foul it off, I know I was late I can feel it and see it in the swing and how the ball came off the bat. But what does the feedback say? "Good" timing, no it wasn't good I was late and I know it.
All feedback does it give you something else to think about/ stress over instead of focusing on the pitcher. Pitch down the middle you pop it up or hit it foul but the feedback says "good" timing, now you're just thinking about why your guy missed it instead of about the pitcher and the next pitch.
Personally I don't guess what's coming, I don't think about what might be coming I see the ball and react. Now yes occasionally on a 2-0, 3-1 count I'm thinking about getting one in my pull zone but I'm not thinking of a specific pitch.
Guess pitch, feedback, strike zones, hot zones while all great features and by all means if you love them use them. But you'll always be behind people that don't use them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Given your response, I'm concluding you've either failed to fully read and evaluate what I stated or you're projecting a personal bias.
I use zone. If I foul a pitch off, its because I failed in some combination of putting the PCI on the ball and/or being late/early. I'm fully aware that Good timing on inside or outside pitches doesn't equate to Good timing.
My initial comments, to which you originally responded, were generally stated assuming a pitch down the middle of the plate. I take responsibility and apologize for not making that generality clear. But now that it has, I reiterate my statement that you are more likely to have a successful outcome being early or late than you are being on time. This was prevalent in 2016 and while it has improved in 2017, it still exists.
Unless you have evidence that the feedback produces random output, then I'm going to maintain my belief that it is deterministic. As such, the displayed PCI placement and timing provide valuable feedback. It is the digital version of the feedback that I would have should I be standing in the box and observant to the physical cues in my swing. Feedback doesn't give me something else to stress over. It gives me information to make an adjustment.
I don't use the guess pitch mechanism, but I do sit on pitches when patterns emerge. It is foolish not to do so.
As I previously stated, I have everything turned off except the PCI, which I occasionally turn off, and the feedback. I agree that turning everything else off as being beneficial. I've done extensive evaluation with the PCI turned off, but failed to see any additional benefit. I only continue to occasionally turn the PCI off because it so often touted as the path to hitting enlightenment on these boards and I question that I might be missing something. But I've grown fairly confident that PCI off doesn't produce anything more than an elitist attitude, but again I remain open to being enlightened.
Finally, being that, according to the leader boards, many of the best players of this game have the PCI on and make use of the feedback, I find your statement that those who use these mechanisms will always be behind those who don't to be baseless and a complete fallacy.