Upcoming Rule Changes...

[TracerBullet]

at the Patriots for abstaining from voting on the Tuck Rule. Pittsburgh was the only team to vote to keep it.

[areobee401]

Quote: Originally Posted by TracerBullet

at the Patriots for abstaining from voting on the Tuck Rule. Pittsburgh was the only team to vote to keep it.

Hey, the Tuck Rule is an important part of our history. Can you blame us?

[SteelerSpartan]

[LambertandHam]

Quote: Originally Posted by TracerBullet

at the Patriots for abstaining from voting on the Tuck Rule. Pittsburgh was the only team to vote to keep it.

Mainly due to Ben

[TracerBullet]

Quote: Originally Posted by @ProFootballTalk

Rich McKay says NFL studied Week 10 and Week 16 from 2012; there would have been 11 flags under the new helmet rule during those two weeks.

From press conference.

[wwharton]

Quote: Originally Posted by TracerBullet

at the Patriots for abstaining from voting on the Tuck Rule. Pittsburgh was the only team to vote to keep it.

Pretty sure it was the Raiders who voted to keep it (which is even funnier).

[TracerBullet]

Quote: Originally Posted by wwharton

Pretty sure it was the Raiders who voted to keep it (which is even funnier).

I read Pittsburgh voted to keep it, Redskins and Patriots abstained. Skins' GM was the Raiders GM at the time.

Unrelated: Bengals were the lone vote against the Crown of Helmet rule.

Edit:

Quote: Originally Posted by @RapSheet

The Tuck Rule vote was 29-1-2. The #Patriots abstained, as did the #Redskins. The #Steelers voted against the Tuck Rule change.

[wwharton]

Quote: Originally Posted by TracerBullet

I read Pittsburgh voted to keep it, Redskins and Patriots abstained. Skins' GM was the Raiders GM at the time. Unrelated: Bengals were the lone vote against the Crown of Helmet rule. Edit:

Ah okay, I heard on the radio (DC station) so they probably just misread it or flubbed it to make the joke. It is funny that Allen would abstain too though.