News Post
MLB 12 The Show Videos
Member Comments
|
|||||||||||||
|
My only concern with Vita versus MLB is: is the gap will be bigger next year as they will add more and more features on the PS3 ?
For sure I won't know until next year. So I am questionning myself now, should I take the risk and buy one or not. It's legit I think to not buy right away everything a marketing department is telling you, whatever the product is.
|
|||||||||||||
|
The dev team had a plan in mind, in regards to what handheld gamers do and want when playing on a handheld device. They don't want to sit there for 1 1/2 hours with it to play one game, which is the "complaint" from people playing on PS3's...even with fast play on.
They specifically went this route for the game.
I can't believe there are conspiracy theories already popping up about the Vita.
I think it's legit to say....you guys are a little nuts.
M.K.
Knight165
|
|||||||||||||
|
I'm not sure though.
M.K.
Knight165
There is no way the vita version would be quicker then the ps3 mlb 11' version of fastplay. That version did not have the intros or the batter walkup stat displays, which the vita has. Start a fastplay in 11' and compare to video. It is clear that the game will be a little longer unless you bypass the cutscreens.
I just would have preferred the option to have the full presentation and "x" through it or opt for fast play if I want to skip them.
Just my preference.
Just my preference.
|
|||||||||||||
|
Wow !
|
|||||||||||||
|
[kuhn-spir-uh-see] Show IPA
noun, plural -cies.
Law . an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act.
While "conspiracy" may be a bit over the top....collusion could be a better term.
What you are alluding to in the bolded sections....is certainly saying that there is a deliberate attempt to hide something or mislead the consumers(fraud) deliberately.
WOW yourself.
M.K.
Knight165
|
|||||||||||||
|
I was just thinking I heard them saying it would be faster than fast play though.
I'm probably wrong though!
M.K.
Knight165
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Of course the devs are smart enough to do marketing research beforehand and their decisions must have been based on the (predicted) usage of Vita users. But there are use cases that might have gone out of their radar... in which case we just remind them that we want certain things......
And from what it looks like from the response here that there aren't many prospective the-Show buyers who would not want full presentation on Vita.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
# 75
bluealtoid @ 02/08/12 02:59 PM
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Vita have some limitation and they had to make compromise like any game porting to any other platform.
You're really over-reacting when someone not saying what you would like him to say. Wow
|
|||||||||||||
|
It's true a platform always has its limitations, but nobody has ever said or indicated that it's platform limitation that prevented the devs from implementing the full presentation mode.
# 78
EnigmaNemesis @ 02/08/12 03:41 PM
The Vita has no "limitation" holding anything out.
In fact we were told it had much more memory to work with than the PS3. And in essence had more power in certain aspects.
It was a design decision.
In fact we were told it had much more memory to work with than the PS3. And in essence had more power in certain aspects.
It was a design decision.
I find it interesting how the psp version of the Show was half the game the Vita is now. Overall people loved the psp version, I am really surprised how many are upset over the presentation pace. At least you have umpires now! In all seriousness the game did not feel like it was rushing you along while playing.
# 80
EnigmaNemesis @ 02/08/12 03:50 PM
|
|||||||||||||
|
Post A Comment