The truth is that the above the table compensation players receive is not nearly comparable to the revenue that they generate for a school. Their status as student-athletes prohibits them from truly earning any sort of supplemental income.
The whole degree and scholarship argument doesnt resonate with me. I have a good number of friends from high school that play D-1 football and basketball. I myself play a non major sport. The fact is that outside of a handful of bcs schools (stanford, vandy, northwestern etc) the "student" part is an afterthought. Most of these kids get degrees in Kinesiology or general studies. Outside of coaching or something athletic related their options are quite limited after college. The schools are using them to generate revenue, and are not pushing them in the classroom or giving them much to work with after graduation.
Ea locker is not really the issue. The larger issue is player likeness. Hopefully it sets a precedent beyond the game, ie player compensation, bcs/ playoff.
Compensation doesnt have to be something immediate. It could for instance be a trust that a player can cash in after they graduate or stop playing. Hopefully it could effect the bcs system as well.
A while ago I came a across an article regarding a playoff system and how the talks broke down with one question. Derrick Brooks asked "whats in it for us[the players]".
The powers to be just dont give a damn about the players, beyond how they can profit off of their talent.
Furthermore keller does have a legitimate case.
"Darren Rovell of CNBC reports that the players in the game are so similar to the players in real life that no one could possibly say with a straight face that EA and the NCAA aren't using the athletes' images. Take the case of Kent State running back Eugene Jarvis:
Jarvis is 5-foot-5, weighs 170 pounds, wears number six and is a redshirt junior from Pennsylvania. In EA's NCAA 2009, the Kent State running back is 5-foot-5, weighs 170 pounds, wears number 6 and is a redshirt junior from Pennsylvania.
Reading that description, does anyone doubt that EA and the NCAA are making money off Jarvis's image? If not, why shouldn't EA and the NCAA have to compensate Jarvis, the way pro athletes are compensated when they appear in video games?"
there was also a similar suit with former nfl players.
"Other athletes have successfully sued over the right to profit from their likenesses, including a group of retired N.F.L. players who sued their union for allowing Electronic Arts to use their identities in Madden NFL without compensating them. In November, a jury awarded more than 2,000 retired players $28.1 million. The award was reduced to $26.25 million in a settlement."