MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • WaitTilNextYear
    Go Cubs Go
    • Mar 2013
    • 16830

    #5701
    Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

    Originally posted by hampshirestags
    I really don't like making Jr. look smart but the above is about as fair as fair gets (even if I think Baez has the most bust potential of the current Cubs prospects). Would the same type of deal work for Russell or would Lee have to be replaced by Hamels?
    To say I disagree with this assessment would be a large understatement.

    The "same deal" would work neither for Lee nor for Hamels. The Cubs would flat out decline.
    Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

    Comment

    • hampshirestags
      Pro
      • May 2014
      • 500

      #5702
      Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

      Originally posted by KBLover
      Works for me. I'd rather keep Cishek, especially considering the season he's having for me right now.

      Here's developing some middle infielders I found that I like and might be in reach. All teams are in the hunt for either the WC or Division.

      SS Jace Peterson (SD) - 23, 72/B, AAA, .267/.340/.366

      SS Chris Taylor (SEA), 23, 74/B, AAA, .264/.363/.334

      Pie-in-the-sky-wishful-thinking SS Addison Russell - this roster doesn't have the real life trade the Cubs made to get him. I know I can't get him - just had to look at him though LOL

      SS Danny Santana (MIN), 23, 73/B, AAA, .214/.265/.301 - needs some work probably but could be a doubles/triples monster in Marlins Park with his speed and with developed contact skills.

      SS Hak-Ju Lee (TB), 23, 74/B, MLB, .251/.329/.322 - defense and speed type - plays everywhere - needs to work on bat, though.

      SS Riley Unroe (TB), 18, 59/B, AA but no stats. Ways off but seems to have a solid base for a HS prospect.

      I would through Dee Gordon on here but the Dodgers want the mint for him so...whatever.

      Too bad getting Billy Hamilton would be unrealistic. I'd try to package to get him and would stick him at SS with his freaking 94 reaction...


      Santana, Peterson, Lee seem to be the most attainable according to spreadsheet value (none of them are higher than B-). Unroe isn't listed, I know I can't get Russell, and Taylor isn't listed either.
      For Dunn, you can't go wrong with Taylor. I also like Peterson and I really like Lee (I live a hour north of Tampa so that that with a grain of salt, I might be a bit of a homer on him).
      "for love of the game" - B. Chapel

      Comment

      • Justino28
        Rookie
        • Apr 2012
        • 161

        #5703
        Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

        Halfway through the season in my Mets franchise and we lost Grandy for 2 months and now need an outfielder
        Thinkin about this; thoughts?

        Mets Get:
        -Josh Reddick 14hr 54rbi .222/.304/.382
        and either
        -Dylan Covey (22y/o b pot) 9-8 3.06 era at AA
        -Bobby Wahl (22y/o b pot) n/a at A

        Athletics Get:
        -Dillon Gee 4-9 3.72 era
        -Noah Syndergaard (21y/o A pot) 10-9 3.01 era at AAA
        -Ike Davis 9hr 26rbi .242/.315/.439

        The A's are 54-52 and 14 back in the west
        Mets, Giants, Rangers, and the Aggies

        "Alright everybody, line up alphabetically in height order"
        -Casey Stengel
        "I'm dead set against free agency, it can ruin baseball"
        -George Steinbrenner

        Comment

        • hampshirestags
          Pro
          • May 2014
          • 500

          #5704
          Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

          Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
          To say I disagree with this assessment would be a large understatement.

          The "same deal" would work neither for Lee nor for Hamels. The Cubs would flat out decline.
          Is that because you are higher on Baez or because you think the Cubs would go in a different direction for pitching? It's easy to disagree on prospects but if you wouldn't trade Baez for pitching at all, that's also good info as well.

          Given your graphic, your opinion on this is important!
          "for love of the game" - B. Chapel

          Comment

          • AC
            Win the East
            • Sep 2010
            • 14951

            #5705
            Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

            Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
            And, not surprisingly, a user team getting Baez again for next to nothing. Bad. Bad. Bad deal. Not realistic in the slightest. Not fair either.
            Lol, let him have this one. There's no other way he's getting Baez. I figured that was better than the broken Appel. I don't know why he wants him with Correa but it's the best possible outcome for him.
            "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

            Comment

            • WaitTilNextYear
              Go Cubs Go
              • Mar 2013
              • 16830

              #5706
              Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

              Originally posted by Justino28
              Halfway through the season in my Mets franchise and we lost Grandy for 2 months and now need an outfielder
              Thinkin about this; thoughts?

              Mets Get:
              -Josh Reddick 14hr 54rbi .222/.304/.382
              and either
              -Dylan Covey (22y/o b pot) 9-8 3.06 era at AA
              -Bobby Wahl (22y/o b pot) n/a at A

              Athletics Get:
              -Dillon Gee 4-9 3.72 era
              -Noah Syndergaard (21y/o A pot) 10-9 3.01 era at AAA
              -Ike Davis 9hr 26rbi .242/.315/.439

              The A's are 54-52 and 14 back in the west
              Please, no. You are fleecing yourself here. There is no one from the A's side that would require Syndergaard to get. You may want think more Steven Matz than Noah..

              Originally posted by hampshirestags
              Is that because you are higher on Baez or because you think the Cubs would go in a different direction for pitching? It's easy to disagree on prospects but if you wouldn't trade Baez for pitching at all, that's also good info as well.

              Given your graphic, your opinion on this is important!
              Well, everyone is high on Baez...he's a top 5-10 prospect in baseball. It's not just me. But, sure, I think his bat can be 'all-time great' in terms of power generation and XBHs. I am thinking 500-HR club if he can continue to develop, stay healthy and have a long career. And we know that offense is at a premium in the modern game.

              I also believe team Theo/Hoyer thinks about cost and team control a lot and taking on old pitchers (even at reduced rates) doesn't make any sense at all within the grand plan. They'd be looking at P's who are 27 and under and if they did get an older pitcher, they certainly would not give up the crown jewel in their organization to do so. Cubs fans would riot if this deal happened IRL--I really have no doubt of that. I'd be looking at pitchfork and lantern prices....but that's me.

              Furthermore, no, there's not a pitcher in baseball (that's available...obviously would do it for Kershaw and probably Strasburg/Fernandez also) that I would deal Baez for. I want to see what he has at the MLB level before I would even think about dealing him away. Remember, the Cubs just did this deal in reverse so to speak with Shark for Russell.
              Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

              Comment

              • hampshirestags
                Pro
                • May 2014
                • 500

                #5707
                Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                Originally posted by Justino28
                Halfway through the season in my Mets franchise and we lost Grandy for 2 months and now need an outfielder
                Thinkin about this; thoughts?

                Mets Get:
                -Josh Reddick 14hr 54rbi .222/.304/.382
                and either
                -Dylan Covey (22y/o b pot) 9-8 3.06 era at AA
                -Bobby Wahl (22y/o b pot) n/a at A

                Athletics Get:
                -Dillon Gee 4-9 3.72 era
                -Noah Syndergaard (21y/o A pot) 10-9 3.01 era at AAA
                -Ike Davis 9hr 26rbi .242/.315/.439

                The A's are 54-52 and 14 back in the west
                Reddick could be had for (using an example from a few days ago) Davis (or comparable) and a low end P prospect. You don't have to give Noah (and recommending you don't unless you just can't pitch with him).
                "for love of the game" - B. Chapel

                Comment

                • WaitTilNextYear
                  Go Cubs Go
                  • Mar 2013
                  • 16830

                  #5708
                  Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                  Originally posted by AC
                  Lol, let him have this one. There's no way in hell he's getting Baez fairly or realistically. I figured that was better than the broken Appel. I don't know why he wants him with Correa but it's the best possible outcome for him.
                  Fixed that for you.

                  Chisers gon' chise.

                  Obviously he can do whatever, but since he's been hanging out in here more often, it appears that realism/fairness is something that the OP is interested in. As a Cubs fan, I had to go on record with my strong distaste.

                  I would guess he's moving Correa or Baez to 3B because Altuve.
                  Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                  Comment

                  • hampshirestags
                    Pro
                    • May 2014
                    • 500

                    #5709
                    Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                    Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
                    Please, no. You are fleecing yourself here. There is no one from the A's side that would require Syndergaard to get. You may want think more Steven Matz than Noah..



                    Well, everyone is high on Baez...he's a top 5-10 prospect in baseball. It's not just me. But, sure, I think his bat can be 'all-time great' in terms of power generation and XBHs. I am thinking 500-HR club if he can continue to develop, stay healthy and have a long career. And we know that offense is at a premium in the modern game.

                    I also believe team Theo/Hoyer thinks about cost and team control a lot and taking on old pitchers (even at reduced rates) doesn't make any sense at all within the grand plan. They'd be looking at P's who are 27 and under and if they did get an older pitcher, they certainly would not give up the crown jewel in their organization to do so. Cubs fans would riot if this deal happened IRL--I really have no doubt of that. I'd be looking at pitchfork and lantern prices....but that's me.

                    Furthermore, no, there's not a pitcher in baseball (that's available...obviously would do it for Kershaw and probably Strasburg/Fernandez also) that I would deal Baez for. I want to see what he has at the MLB level before I would even think about dealing him away. Remember, the Cubs just did this deal in reverse so to speak with Shark for Russell.
                    Great explanation of your value of Baez. I disagree but also realize I am minority opinion...for now. We'll have another couple years to debate Baez but agree Lee is a rough fit, to say the least.

                    That being said, AC's suggestion covers the value and if the user wants to play with Baez in Houston, we should try to come up with some way to make it as close to fair as possible, right?
                    "for love of the game" - B. Chapel

                    Comment

                    • KBLover
                      Hall Of Fame
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 12172

                      #5710
                      Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                      Originally posted by hampshirestags
                      For Dunn, you can't go wrong with Taylor. I also like Peterson and I really like Lee (I live a hour north of Tampa so that that with a grain of salt, I might be a bit of a homer on him).

                      Yeah, looking at all those infielders made me like Peterson and Lee too. I want them all now LOL.

                      Gonna do that Dunn for Taylor. Thanks guys
                      "Some people call it butterflies, but to him, it probably feels like pterodactyls in his stomach." --Plesac in MLB18

                      Comment

                      • kmoser
                        MVP
                        • Jul 2012
                        • 1398

                        #5711
                        Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                        Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
                        Fixed that for you.



                        Chisers gon' chise.



                        Obviously he can do whatever, but since he's been hanging out in here more often, it appears that realism/fairness is something that the OP is interested in. As a Cubs fan, I had to go on record with my strong distaste.



                        I would guess he's moving Correa or Baez to 3B because Altuve.

                        I've been reading your comments and I don't think I am going to do the deal now lol. If I did get Baez I would just move him to 3rd.
                        I do have one question however. What if, instead I the Phillies, I make the Rays the other team in the deal and the Cubs get Price? I know I would have to give up more prospects for Price in the deal but just wondering. I'm in year two so most of the "big" Cubs prospects are either up or very close.


                        Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                        Comment

                        • hampshirestags
                          Pro
                          • May 2014
                          • 500

                          #5712
                          Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                          Originally posted by kmoser
                          I've been reading your comments and I don't think I am going to do the deal now lol. If I did get Baez I would just move him to 3rd.
                          I do have one question however. What if, instead I the Phillies, I make the Rays the other team in the deal and the Cubs get Price? I know I would have to give up more prospects for Price in the deal but just wondering. I'm in year two so most of the "big" Cubs prospects are either up or very close.


                          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                          I didn't realize we were talking about you! Tsk, tsk, tsk (in my best grandpa voice). However, I allow myself 1 "fantasy" trade in a franchise as long as I overpay so I get where you're coming from.

                          2015 could bring a totally different set of circumstances and if TB still has Price, they will not resign him and will look to trade (unless they are taking a C. Crawford type risk at a WS). I want WTNY to weigh in but think Price is a much better option than Lee or Hamels.
                          "for love of the game" - B. Chapel

                          Comment

                          • kmoser
                            MVP
                            • Jul 2012
                            • 1398

                            #5713
                            Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                            Originally posted by hampshirestags
                            I didn't realize we were talking about you! Tsk, tsk, tsk (in my best grandpa voice). However, I allow myself 1 "fantasy" trade in a franchise as long as I overpay so I get where you're coming from.



                            2015 could bring a totally different set of circumstances and if TB still has Price, they will not resign him and will look to trade (unless they are taking a C. Crawford type risk at a WS). I want WTNY to weigh in but think Price is a much better option than Lee or Hamels.

                            The Rays have Price on the block (if that even means anything in this game). Russell is in the Majors and Starlin Castro is having a good year, as well as Bryant tearing up AAA so I just thought Baez could be had, but maybe not.



                            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                            Comment

                            • hampshirestags
                              Pro
                              • May 2014
                              • 500

                              #5714
                              Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                              Originally posted by kmoser
                              The Rays have Price on the block (if that even means anything in this game). Russell is in the Majors and Starlin Castro is having a good year, as well as Bryant tearing up AAA so I just thought Baez could be had, but maybe not.



                              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                              Always ignore the trading block. You have a better handle than the CPU on just about every player. Cubs couldn't/wouldn't look for a 1 for 1 with TB and Price so it would require a 3rd team and HOU while not logical with their SS stud could still move Baez to LF and makes sense with their IRL strategy.

                              I stink with 3 team trades in the game but know they are others than can come up with packages. Your dance partner here is a team that is 2-3 years away from getting to .500.

                              Edit: meaning if everybody is trying to win, HOU probably doesn't get invited to the dance. Have you thought about other 3b or do you just want to play with Baez? If so, give Correa.
                              Last edited by hampshirestags; 07-26-2014, 04:33 PM. Reason: explanation
                              "for love of the game" - B. Chapel

                              Comment

                              • kmoser
                                MVP
                                • Jul 2012
                                • 1398

                                #5715
                                Re: MLB 14 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                                Originally posted by hampshirestags
                                Always ignore the trading block. You have a better handle than the CPU on just about every player. Cubs couldn't/wouldn't look for a 1 for 1 with TB and Price so it would require a 3rd team and HOU while not logical with their SS stud could still move Baez to LF and makes sense with their IRL strategy.

                                I stink with 3 team trades in the game but know they are others than can come up with packages. Your dance partner here is a team that is 2-3 years away from getting to .500.

                                Edit: meaning if everybody is trying to win, HOU probably doesn't get invited to the dance. Have you thought about other 3b or do you just want to play with Baez? If so, give Correa.

                                I was planning on moving Baez to 3rd if we got him


                                Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                                Comment

                                Working...