2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
-
Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
These two trades show how bad the show's trade logic is
Rangers get
Jason Bourgeois(4th outfielder)
Louis Colemean (Reliever)
Royals get:
Mike Olt (High B)
Migel De Los Santos(Mid B)
Rougned Odor(High B)
Rangers get: Justin Morneau
Royals get
Jackson Profar(High A)
Martin Perez(High A)
Mitch Moreland(Below Average 1st Baseman hitting .222 )
Basically the Rangers traded away there whole Farm system for A Reliever and Justin Morneau. Good thing I didn't save it and I was able to back out and come back so the trades never happenedComment
-
Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Also another David Wirght Trade that I was offered
Mets get:
Zach Lee
Adam Kennedy
Rubby De La Rosa
Dodgers get
David WrightComment
-
Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
In my Pirates franchise I need an ace and Ubaldo is performing poorly and the Indians are a disaster at the All Star break.
I'm thinking an A and 2 B's - fair?Comment
-
Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
that's way too much and why would u want him if he's pitching poorly?Steelers | Seminoles | A's | Rockets | Avalanche | Wildcats, Hoosiers | LiverpoolComment
-
Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
These two trades show how bad the show's trade logic is
Rangers get
Jason Bourgeois(4th outfielder)
Louis Colemean (Reliever)
Royals get:
Mike Olt (High B)
Migel De Los Santos(Mid B)
Rougned Odor(High B)
Rangers get: Justin Morneau
Royals get
Jackson Profar(High A)
Martin Perez(High A)
Mitch Moreland(Below Average 1st Baseman hitting .222 )
Basically the Rangers traded away there whole Farm system for A Reliever and Justin Morneau. Good thing I didn't save it and I was able to back out and come back so the trades never happened
Basically what NFG said."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
My other options (trying to keep it realistic) are Tim Hudson, one of the Phillies guys, Wandy Rodriguez or Billingsley.
I'll make it an A and a B prospect and leave it at that. Thanks for the feedback guys.Comment
-
Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
AL to NL for one. Plus he's a lot better than anyone I have now and would immediately become my #1.
My other options (trying to keep it realistic) are Tim Hudson, one of the Phillies guys, Wandy Rodriguez or Billingsley.
I'll make it an A and a B prospect and leave it at that. Thanks for the feedback guys."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Comment
-
"Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Arright well I'll take your word for it. What about Billingsley, Josh Johnson, Hamels or Wandy? Any thoughts on a fair price for those guys?Comment
-
Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
JJ is three high B's or one low A, Billingsley is two B's, Hamels is unrealistic, and Wandy is the same as Billingsley."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Yeah but in the deal u got Juan Rivera, who doesn't play for the Jays anymore, and mike Napoli, who was immediately traded too Texas for Ben Francisco, who as we all no was traded to Houston, so u didn't get much
Sent from my SCH-I405 using Tapatalk 2Comment
-
Re: 2012 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Aside from the incredibly glaring error, we moved a 20M contract. We win."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Comment
Comment