MLB Off-Topic
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Re: MLB Off-Topic
Pretty sure it's just a "we don't really like him + there just hasn't been a reason to sign one of his clients" situation rather than an outright ban. He always goes for long contracts, and the Jays don't like long contracts. Or free agents, for whatever reason."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: MLB Off-Topic
Oh I know, there's no actual ban or hate towards either side. It's just a long standing thing that they haven't done business together.Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club
"Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. ParkerComment
-
Re: MLB Off-Topic
Hope harper isnt same situation either. Gonna suck if he goes to yankees one day. We're in the generation where the younger guys grewup during steroid days and saw yankees cheat/dominate for years and prob jumped on their bandwagon and dreamt of playing for them.Comment
-
Re: MLB Off-Topic
Originally posted by GilleyMatt Harvey can screw off. Just go ahead and trade him to the Yankees since it's clear that's where he's wanted to be since day one. He and Boras are both pathetic.Originally posted by GilleyI mean it's possible I'm just reaching but Harvey doesn't seem to care about the team at all. He whines about the 6 man rotation and being pulled from games early, but now he wants to have an innings limit. It's crazy.Boston Red Sox
1903 1912 1915 1916 1918 2004 2007 2013 2018
9 4 1 8 27 6 14 45 26 34
Comment
-
Re: MLB Off-Topic
I see this is about to become Strasburg Part II, but this time in New York.
I want to know when Boras/Harvey told the Mets organization that 180 innings was the recommended cap by Dr. Andrews.OSHA Inspector for the NBA.Comment
-
"Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: MLB Off-Topic
I got my answer:
So much for the 180-inning limit. It appears the Mets' Matt Harvey will pitch in the postseason after all, according to his piece in The Players’ Tribune.
"Boras first reached out to the Mets about the 180-inning limit one week ago, on Aug. 29."
Boras screwed up and now his client is going to suffer an enormous PR hit (aside from weakening the Mets during a playoffs race and probably his standing on the locker room) if he stops pitching.
What a mess.OSHA Inspector for the NBA.Comment
-
Re: MLB Off-Topic
I got my answer:
So much for the 180-inning limit. It appears the Mets' Matt Harvey will pitch in the postseason after all, according to his piece in The Players’ Tribune.
"Boras first reached out to the Mets about the 180-inning limit one week ago, on Aug. 29."
Boras screwed up and now his client is going to suffer an enormous PR (aside from weakening the Mets during a playoffs race and probably on the eyes of his teammates) hit if he stops pitching.
What a mess.Comment
-
Re: MLB Off-Topic
Who cares about his reputation...I am completely fine with it from Harvey's perspective. Why put so many innings on your arm in your first year back from TJ, when you can possibly do something to it again and cost yourself 100s of millions of dollars, like Josh Johnson. Even though Johnson had different arm issues and never got TJ to my knowledge. But why risk it?
Now Boras goes to the Mets when they're in the midst of going into the playoffs and springs this on the organization?! It's a pretty crummy job by Boras IMO. Oh, it's the absolute right thing for him to do for his client but it screws the Mets.
This is one of the reasons why Boras isn't particularly well liked.Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club
"Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. ParkerComment
-
Re: MLB Off-Topic
Who cares about his reputation...I am completely fine with it from Harvey's perspective. Why put so many innings on your arm in your first year back from TJ, when you can possibly do something to it again and cost yourself 100s of millions of dollars, like Josh Johnson. Even though Johnson had different arm issues and never got TJ to my knowledge. But why risk it?
I got no problem with a cap, Dr. Andrews says jump, I ask how high?
But there is no question this could've been handle better by Boras. The Mets have been contending for a long time now and this is the moment Boras decides to bring this up? Yikes.OSHA Inspector for the NBA.Comment
-
Re: MLB Off-Topic
The Phillies haven’t yet decided what to do with GM Ruben Amaro. On the surface, that seems strange, since other teams could soon hire top GM candidates to fill their open positions. The likely reason the Phillies haven’t made a move, Rosenthal suggests, is that incoming club president Andy MacPhail prefers not to rush decisions.
I feel bad for Phillies fans...
Also on Boras/Harvey/Mets:
Harvey’s agent Scott Boras conducted a study regarding Tommy John recipients similar to Harvey, reports Ken Rosenthal of FOX Sports. Boras looked at pitchers who never exceeded 200 innings in a season, had Tommy John surgery, then returned with a roughly 200 inning workload.
Four pitchers fit into the statistical bucket – Shaun Marcum, Josh Johnson, Jarrod Parker, and Kris Medlen. Three of them required a second Tommy John surgery while the fourth, Marcum, is quite familiar with the disabled list. Boras offers Stephen Strasburg and Jordan Zimmermann as two examples who built their innings total more carefully. Obviously, both pitchers have yet to experience another elbow related injury.
To be fair, any statistician would warn against taking this case study at face value. For one, the sample size consists of four pitchers. It’s interesting that all four pitchers have experienced continual health problems, but it’s hardly statistically significant. Also, correlation does not equal causation. It’s possible other factors were at play for Marcum, Johnson, Parker, and Medlen. This is not to say Boras, Harvey, and the Mets should ignore the case study. It just isn’t a smoking gun.Comment
Comment