MLB Off-Topic
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: MLB Off-Topic
If he doesn't win Cy Young, then voting is a joke. W/L should mean absolutely nothing to judging a starters performance.
Even more advanced stats on deGrom:
-ERA BELOW 1 in wins
-ERA of 2.73 in losses
-Allowed 4 runs this season just ONCE
-Hasn't allowed more than 3 runs at home since September 5 2017.
-Brewers are only non NL East team to score 4+ runs against deGrom in New York in his entire MLB career.
For comparison, he has a better ERA in losses than 3 teams in the league have in games they won.Last edited by Majingir; 09-04-2018, 07:01 PM.Comment
-
Re: MLB Off-Topic
If he doesn't win Cy Young, then voting is a joke. W/L should mean absolutely nothing to judging a starters performance.
Even more advanced stats on deGrom:
-ERA BELOW 1 in wins
-ERA of 2.73 in losses
-Allowed 4 runs this season just ONCE
-Hasn't allowed more than 3 runs at home since September 5 2017.
-Brewers are only non NL East team to score 4+ runs against deGrom in New York in his entire MLB career.
For comparison, he has a better ERA in losses than 3 teams in the league have in games they won.
Sent from my SM-J327VPP using TapatalkComment
-
Re: MLB Off-Topic
deGrom is overrated. An ace needs to win ballgames.
-Joe MorganChicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: MLB Off-Topic
Lol, I miss Sunday night baseball with Miller and Morgan. The hatred for Morgan was hilarious to me. But It was also great because back then we could not watch literally any game we wanted every day. Made it an actual showcase game. I am not nostalgic about much, but chill Sundays evenings in the 1990s with baseball was fun.Comment
-
-
Re: MLB Off-Topic
Shouldn't Keith Hernandez be spitting at them or something? That magic loogie.Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Comment
-
Re: MLB Off-Topic
Brandon Phillips is the 1,795th player to appear in a game for the Red Sox, and is the first one to ever wear #0.Boston Red Sox
1903 1912 1915 1916 1918 2004 2007 2013 2018
9 4 1 8 27 6 14 45 26 34
Comment
Comment