He is probably the closest to MJ in the league based on his willingness to want to win. The big difference is Kobe seems to want to shoulder the responsibilty alone trusting no one on his team or lacks the ability to defer to others when the moment calls for it. This is the main difference and imo it is the main factor between a great player gettin no rings/rings on a team lacking no other superstars/all-stars.
I thought Charles Barkley would have a ring in 1993 if he defered to KJ more who was killing the Bulls guards at will. Instead, Chuck wanted to do everything waiving KJ off and bringing the ball up the court like a PG hogging the rock.
Ofcourse there's a level of selfishness that goes along with being a superstar in the NBA. There is also a team aspect as well that goes into being successful. Three egos busted up the Laker dynasty(Phil,Shaq,Kobe) not just one. Out of those 3, only two were on the court playing and only one showed that he was not willing to defer his talents for the team's ultimate success when the moment called for it.
If Kobe develops the "trust your teammates" mentality this year on top of the new rule changes on D in the NBA, Kobe could certainly bring it.
Kobe's athletic abilities aren't even debateable imo as they are vast.

Can't we all just give it up, and stop trying to tell Jordan that Kobe is no where close to MJ, and the Bulls may never be touched as far as a dynasty goes?
Comment