Decertification it is.
Official CBA Thread
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: Official CBA Thread
Everyone who owns season tickets and has to pay for 2 meaningless preseason games.
Sure there will be more injuries with more games, but the % isn't going to change. The roster size and IR rules will change so that players who are hurt can be rested and kept on the roster. # of IR will go down because teams won't need to use it to hide players that they want to keep.
Who wants bigger rosters? The talent is already spread thin in the NFL the last thing needed is guys playing that shouldnt be on an NFL team.Comment
-
Re: Official CBA Thread
Mike Silver:
NFLPA just applied for decertification. Antitrust lawsuit in Minnesota likely to follow. Fasten your seat belts.
Member: OS Uni Snob Association | Twitter: @MyNameIsJesseG | #WT4M | #WatchTheWorldBurn
Originally posted by l3ulvlA lot of you guys seem pretty cool, but you have wieners.Comment
-
Re: Official CBA Thread
De Smith demanding 10 years of audited financial data if another bargaining extension is granted or they'll decertify, and gave owners a 5pm EST deadline.
So NFL makes big concessions, meets the union halfway, union simply says no and then makes demands. A deal isn't going to get done with this union leadership.
Both sides could have done better. As it stands, we're going to have fun in the courts it appears.Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: Official CBA Thread
De Smith demanding 10 years of audited financial data if another bargaining extension is granted or they'll decertify, and gave owners a 5pm EST deadline.
So NFL makes big concessions, meets the union halfway, union simply says no and then makes demands. A deal isn't going to get done with this union leadership.Comment
-
Re: Official CBA Thread
Part of it is probably pride, part stubbornness, and I also think part of it is because they are hiding things they don't want the players (or public) to know.Comment
-
Re: Official CBA Thread
Being realistic, I imagined it would get conveniently leaked if in fact it was supposed to stay private.Comment
-
Re: Official CBA Thread
I think that was the poster point. If this goes to trial owners will be forced to open the books. So if they are hiding something then what? Lose-lose for owners and Im sure this is what De Smith and company are banking on.You looking at the Chair MAN!
Number may not tell the whole story ,but they never lie either.Comment
-
Re: Official CBA Thread
This is why I cant blame the players. If you say you are losing money and need a billion back.....prove it to me.Comment
-
Re: Official CBA Thread
Guaranteed it would leak but the Judge could designate the documents confidential and only seen by the parties and their attorneys.Comment
-
Re: Official CBA Thread
I thought they'd probably leak anyways, but was hoping it might be public regardless so we don't have to worry about it. Either way, it's going to be real interesting to see the numbers if we get to that point.Comment
-
Re: Official CBA Thread
I put this whole mess on the owners.
(from Drew Brees):
"The NFL brought this fight to us – they want $1 billion back, we just want financial information to back up that request. They refuse to give that information to us. They think we should just trust them. Would you?"
From everything I've read and heard, this whole mess seems to be driven by the owners at the bottom(guys like Mike Brown & Jerry Richardson). They're not making as much as the top owners(Jerry Jones, Snyder & the Maras), so they want givebacks from the players.
Comment
Comment