Yeah, man. It's all good with me. I'd like to think my sliders are good for coach mode players just because I try to even everything out and make the cpu on par with the hum, that's why I normally have qb acc the same, and a few other sliders the same. I think that 'should' offer realism. When it comes to playing, I always have to give the cpu a little edge to make it more challenging, of course, but I've normally felt good about the competitive play, and while I always 'play', I think I may be a little slower in my old age or not as 'into' the game sometimes, so I may play a touch passive, and therefore, I may throw more bad passes myself including ints because I'm just a little late on a throw. Other players that are completely zoned in and are too quick on the sticks may find my sliders less challenging than others, but i still say, most of the game will still look real imo. But, yeah, any changes you make or like, especially ones you think are good for coach mode players are good by me. Actually, either later today or tomorrow, I'll try to add a "coach mode" slider set next to the others. Feel free to update me with a reply when you change something or think something isn't working well and I can update the OP. And, actually, something you might want to try is putting both pass coverages at 37. You could try 38, but my guess is you will see a lot of picks and/or a few too many coverage sacks. I'm trying to work out where pass coverage might make things more challenging, and as I've said in my previous posts, good god, setting cpu pass cov to 38, I threw 14 picks in 2 games!!!! lol. i put it back down to 37, and think I threw 2 in that game. So, that's an interesting threshold spot I'm currently testing for challenge and realism. Really, I have a feeling pass coverage 38 offers really good zone coverage (maybe, too good), as I see the DBs moving around a little more in their zone instead of standing around, and in particular, in the middle of the field, man, they seem to position themselves equidistant from all offensive players in and around their zone. I think the off/def pi set 'correctly' (which is hard to tell, but I'm thinking now either 58/59 or 59/60) gives proper man coverage, so hopefully these things together will offer good coverage.