JA Money14's NBA 2K14 OneandOnly Realism Sliders

[lisinas]

JA did you with your tendency sliders had any problem with CPU not feeding post players at all ?

[JA Money14]

Quote: Originally Posted by lisinas

JA did you with your tendency sliders had any problem with CPU not feeding post players at all ?

I tried my best to fix it but it's a roster and 2K problem

[harmonyyy]

Do I need to perform any changes on hall of fame or I can use all same settings for it as well?

[JA Money14]

Quote: Originally Posted by harmonyyy

Do I need to perform any changes on hall of fame or I can use all same settings for it as well?

Should be about the same

[DynamoGuernsey]

I figure I'd post in this thread since I'm currently using JA's sliders, though it has to do with a problem that I've found with every set of sliders I've used.

How the hell do you get the CPU to shoot? In the few days since I've tried to gear my game towards a more simulation-style, one problem seems to stay around no matter what my tendencies / shot success rates are at. The CPU holds onto the ball.

I've tried playing out a bunch of CPU-CPU games to test different sliders, and no CPU team has once broken 70 FGA in a game. Only 3 teams in the NBA average fewer than 80. This is mainly because the CPU-controlled teams seem to just spend 80% of their plays just holding onto the ball at the top of the key or the elbow until the clock runs out. CPU players will routinely pass up wide open corner 3's in favor of passing it into the post (the other game, Ray Allen passed on a wide open corner 3 so he could pass to a double-teamed Mario Chalmers in the paint), and this is after I tried jacking up the 3 tendency and reducing the pass to post tendency. I haven't once had a CPU team break 100 points, either, and they very rarely break 90.

I started on All-Star, though I eventually moved up the difficulty to Superstar. Not sure if that did anything, though it does seem to have somewhat increased the frequency of plays being run by the CPU.

I'm not sure how I could have the exact same settings as others, yet my CPU players don't move. It's pretty frustrating to have every game end 84-75.


Anyway, TLDR: I guess my question is, if I wanted to change a slider that strictly changed how "trigger-happy" the CPU players are to give me a more realistic FGA per game, what would it be? Should I just jack up all the shot tendencies, keeping them relative to each other?

I wouldn't think it has to do with success rates. FG% isn't the problem, it's just that no one wants to shoot.


Thanks for any help

[lhslancers]

From what I have read here it is not a slider problem.

[JA Money14]

Quote: Originally Posted by DynamoGuernsey

I figure I'd post in this thread since I'm currently using JA's sliders, though it has to do with a problem that I've found with every set of sliders I've used. How the hell do you get the CPU to shoot? In the few days since I've tried to gear my game towards a more simulation-style, one problem seems to stay around no matter what my tendencies / shot success rates are at. The CPU holds onto the ball. I've tried playing out a bunch of CPU-CPU games to test different sliders, and no CPU team has once broken 70 FGA in a game. Only 3 teams in the NBA average fewer than 80. This is mainly because the CPU-controlled teams seem to just spend 80% of their plays just holding onto the ball at the top of the key or the elbow until the clock runs out. CPU players will routinely pass up wide open corner 3's in favor of passing it into the post (the other game, Ray Allen passed on a wide open corner 3 so he could pass to a double-teamed Mario Chalmers in the paint), and this is after I tried jacking up the 3 tendency and reducing the pass to post tendency. I haven't once had a CPU team break 100 points, either, and they very rarely break 90. I started on All-Star, though I eventually moved up the difficulty to Superstar. Not sure if that did anything, though it does seem to have somewhat increased the frequency of plays being run by the CPU. I'm not sure how I could have the exact same settings as others, yet my CPU players don't move. It's pretty frustrating to have every game end 84-75. Anyway, TLDR: I guess my question is, if I wanted to change a slider that strictly changed how "trigger-happy" the CPU players are to give me a more realistic FGA per game, what would it be? Should I just jack up all the shot tendencies, keeping them relative to each other? I wouldn't think it has to do with success rates. FG% isn't the problem, it's just that no one wants to shoot. Thanks for any help

LH is Right, its not a slider issue it's mainly a roster problem. You could fix it only minor scale by doing what you said, relatively increasing the shot tenancy sliders according to one another. Tweak however you want to figure out and play style. The set is not built for every player on the planet. If however you want to do it.

[lisinas]

Quote: Originally Posted by DynamoGuernsey

Anyway, TLDR: I guess my question is, if I wanted to change a slider that strictly changed how "trigger-happy" the CPU players are to give me a more realistic FGA per game, what would it be? Should I just jack up all the shot tendencies, keeping them relative to each other? I wouldn't think it has to do with success rates. FG% isn't the problem, it's just that no one wants to shoot. Thanks for any help

Make sure you are not using 2k's official roster, player tendencies are messed up there , secondly try some other tendency slider set than JA's , for example from this thread http://www.operationsports.com/forum...ed-arises.html (i hope JA dont mind this)

I've been playing with these tendency sliders and Med's roster (PC) on Superstar and cpu shoots from 80 to high 90 attempts per game , its actually a bit too much for my taste so i just reduced quarter length to 11 minutes and it seems perfect now.